Tigerhawk weighs in on the Berkeley protests here, with links. But no one seems to have included a few gems from the original source article. They deserve to be highlighted. The world view of the protesters tells us this will happen, again - and likely get worse; the university's weak response will be partly to blame for it; and no amount of reasoning will help.
Who led the protest and what do you suppose her preferences are for the Middle East? Don't be surprised if the same mindset, perhaps among others, helps to contribute to violent protest on behalf of the Palestinians here one day.
"We decided it was necessary to take action," said Andi Walden, a Middle Eastern studies and political science major. "A lot of people have been saying, 'Whose university? Our university.' So we decided to put that into action."
How did the administration respond in thought? They're "disappointed". My, however will these students cope with such a strong scolding? And how much does it do to tell them to do it, again?
Janet Gilmore, a spokeswoman for the university, said employees on campus "share the frustration" of the occupiers, but "at the same time we're disappointed that they had taken this action."
Finally, what was achieved? Well, nothing, really. But it was a great success!
"There was no negotiating going on," UC Berkeley spokesman Dan Mogulof said. "They had an all-or-nothing stance, and the university had neither the ability nor the inclination to give them what they were demanding, and not under these conditions."
After she was led from Wheeler Hall to wild cheers from onlookers, doctoral student Ianna Owen, 23, said, "I feel like we really mobilized people."
She said she would continue to address the fee hikes issue and was not disappointed the group's demands were not met.
"Not all gains are material," she said.