Just a couple of points in follow up to this brief discussion of the future of the GOP brand with Katherine Mangu-Ward and Glenn Reynolds:
Meanwhile, noting the Palin hatred, the Bush hatred and, I suspect, looming Obama hatred, I have a thought on why politics is more polarized than it used to be: It's because people have more at risk. As Jerry Pournelle wrote a while back, "We have always known that eternal vigilance is the price of freedom. It's worse now, because capture of government is so much more important than it once was. There was a time when there was enough freedom that it hardly mattered which brand of crooks ran government. That has not been true for a long time -- not during most of your lifetimes, and for much of mine -- and it will probably never be true again."
I wonder if those of us who follow media and politics closely don't over read some of the hate meme? For all the supposed hatred of Bush, and Reagan before him, both men did manage to get elected twice to the highest office in the land. I don't believe the average voter follows all this closely enough to come to hate anyone that much. They are more likely to just like, or not like the government they're getting. And right now, there's plenty of reason for concern about DC, including Obama's big changes that will impact people's lives in ways I doubt they understand, or expect.
Also, I agree with Glenn on what the GOP brand should be. True, it may take some time, as it did to set up 1994, as the current faces of the GOP are mostly identified with DC. But there isn't as many of them today as there were thanks to recent losses. To some extent, that should help the GOP in 2010.
New faces and new blood allow a party to at least pretend there's some real change going on. But then, I'd add the Tea Party movement into the mix. Just as citizens are stirred up, hopefully there will be some serious new players on the GOP political side who get the message and will be able to pick up the banner of 1994 - or at least be influenced by that movement to hold it up and be held to it for a time. The banner was dropped, as too many Republicans were in DC for too long. That simply isn't the case, now. To the extent the GOP can brand the Dems as the party of DC every bit as they carve out a new identity for themselves, I suspect they will be positioned pretty well going into 2010.
I'd like to see the party run as a party of small government, individual liberty and fiscal responsibility.