NRO's the Corner has a very revealing interview with Rep. Bart Stupak. Somehow I doubt his leadership wants this out there. He claims they are now ignoring those who can't be coerced, including with pressure from the unions.
Unbelievable, well, it should be. But I guess not.
What are Democratic leaders saying?“If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,”Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”
Update: Via Say Anything, evidently Pelosi finds abortions more efficient than tax cuts.


My God that is cold.
Posted by: Terrye | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 04:51 PM
Why, to them it's probably mostly black babies, or hispanics? They don't care.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 04:53 PM
I'm posting this here instead of on the post below where the conversation started, so that it won't be passed over.
A few posts back, 2cents and Jimbo were talking tough about what pussies and pushovers right-wingers were, and how we couldn't possibly stand up to big tough tyrants like themselves.
These were the same things leftists were saying about the NRA, and gun owners generally, in the late Nineties, when Clinton was trying to curb gun rights.
How did that work out for you, gentlemen?
FWIW, it didn't take a "revolution" or violence; once the gun owners proved that they could bring down Smith and Wesson, when S&W caved to the Clinton lawsuits, the Democrats dropped gun control like a hot potato. As a result, we have today more gun owners with more guns, under less restrictions, than we did 10 years ago.
Similarly, I doubt that the Democrats will actually ride this through to the point of facing a revolution. If they do, the revolution is (1) very likely to succeed, (2) very unlikely to be a full-fledged war like the American Revolution, and (3) very likely to be much like the 1991 Russian Revolution--which is to say, that the decisive moment will be when the U.S. military refuses to murder their fellow citizens. The heroes of today's revolution won't be men with tricorner hats at Valley Forge; they'll be mothers who call their sons in the service on their cellphones, begging them not to engage in Tiananmen-type actions on their fathers and brothers.
If it does come to this--and I hope it won't--the Mike2Cents types aren't likely to come out well. People like Harry Reid will be able to hop on a plane to England; the Jimbos of the nation are going to be left to an angry populace, who remember their atrocities. And yes, they will commit atrocities; they live for the pleasure of hurting someone weaker than themselves, provided they have adequate backup.
And, BTW, I really have to doubt that vets will take the side of tyrants. From my observation, vehicles with a USMC sticker are at least 50% likely to have an NRA sticker as well. Ditto for veteran's license plates. I just don't see the average vet being comfortable taking the side of a bunch of low-rent bullies, paid by the SEIU to terrorize the weak.
If the lefties are lucky, they'll get out with only a half-decade in the political wilderness--as was the case with their attempt to crush gun owners in the Clinton era--instead of a full-fledged revolution.
Posted by: Ken | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 05:12 PM
Very, very nice commentary, Ken. In 99% of history, "low-rent bullies" like Jimbo will haul ass like a stuck pig when push comes to shove. In the other 1%, they have to be hung. I believe old Jimbo to be a 99 percenter. LOL.
As for the military, I have a son in the US Army, and I guarantee he won't fire on his fellow citizens protesting an out of control government. He will help them. As will 90% of his infantry unit.
Posted by: templar knight | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 06:19 PM
You better believe it Dan.
I am glad Stupak has the guts to talk about it. It is about time liberals are held accountable for this mass murder of the weakest members of our society, our unborn babies and infants.
Hillary invited us to list human rights abuses in America.
Let us inform them about the infants that are dying a slow and painful death in hospitals and abortion centres here in AMERICA because a very important certain someone voted to deny urgent medical intervention to those of them who survived an abortion.
The Compassionate Liberal Left love BLACKS and HISPANICS so much that they erect abortion centres with huge surgical rooms in our communities to KILL our unborn babies. Population control of the inferior races.
Let us tell the UN about all this!
I am glad I have found concervative blogs. Now I know that somewhere in America right is still RIGHT, and wrong is still LEFT.
Posted by: Ricky | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 06:35 PM
Basic leftism. Abortion, eugenics, population control. Goes back hundreds of years. All the coldness, viciousness and brutality of the Left is excused and sanctified by the noble search for a better world, you know. They're the dreamers and saviors and demigods. They can do anything.
Posted by: rrpjr | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 07:22 PM
What I can't understand is how Stupak can stand to be classified as Democrats. IMO, there is nothing the Democrats cherish more than the right to destroy inconvenient children. Of course, the fact that they can get all the votes they need just by bringing in more illegals has to be part of their viewpoint. Otherwise, they would have been the minority party years ago.
Posted by: pagar | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 07:22 PM
In their frenzy the Democrats seem to be sinking lower and lower. This will not end well.
Posted by: Philip McDaniel | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 07:45 PM
"Population control of the inferior races."
Read up on the founder of Planned Parenthood. That's precisely what her reasoning was.
Posted by: PA | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 07:46 PM
The ghost of Sanger lives on with the Dems.No wonder they covet amnesty for illegals.
Posted by: mike191 | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 07:47 PM
"Why, to them it's probably mostly black babies, or hispanics? They don't care."
Hispanics? No problem, madam Speaker, we can always get more...
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi's vineyard manager | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 08:10 PM
Babies may be an expense up front but they grow up to be taxpayers who'll put more into the system than they take out. With the way the Democrats, and the Dutch think, you're right to point out, with a real world example, the practical result of their thinking. Mrs. Reid has outlived her usefulness and is a needless expense.
If we hadn't aborted 50,000,000 babies Social Security wouldn't be in the trouble it's in. These people are ignorant and stupid. Irrational and illogical come to mind - no ad hominems here, facts are facts! Why are Spain and Greece in trouble - aside from greedy public sector unions - they don't have the young people able to finance the generous government pensions. DUH
Posted by: BHG | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 09:55 PM
But one would think someone as smart Stupak would have seen this coming back when he VOTED FOR THE HOUSE HEALTH CARE BILL. As I recall, a lot of other people did. Well done Bart. Genius, that one.
Posted by: RickS | Friday, March 12, 2010 at 11:05 PM
You all are GOP fools - except Mike2Cents and a couple others. You write about me, before I say anything at all? Is that the deal? You cowards on the right simply decide what I am about, then write your own warped version of me? You feel entitled to do that too?
For the record douchebags, I was in the military for 20+ years (Marine, Beruit 1983) - ya remember the importance of that year in that part of the world? Some thing about our beloved soldiers getting bombed in the barracks. I was there, were you? Do you know your history? Then back off the threats and BS about who I am. Together you all don't have the courage to fight your own fight. You leave me to do it for you. If you have kids or loved ones who are serving, then God bless them - and shut up about me - and my service to your freedom. A simple thanks would suffice. I don't expect anything from folks who cheer on others to fight, but they have no guts to serve themselves. I accept your thanks.
Now that that is settled, get your focus out of other peoples lives. Leave them alone. If you want to have babies, then have babies. If you get pregnant, discuss your options with your doctor - not Bart Stupak - or the puritans who write shite on this blog. It seems to me that you are so bothered by your own failings - within your own life - that you must project your wishes on all others? Get your own box headed lives in order, then we can talk. Until then look into your own souls, not mine.
Posted by: Jimbo | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 12:50 PM
Ken^^
Seriously, dude, you have got to keep taking your meds. That's some serious delusional stuff your ranting. Your doctor can help you. Give it a try.
Posted by: Todd | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 02:08 PM
Hate to challenge you guys with facts and stuff, but universal healyth care has been proven to reduce the abortion rate.
Citation, please. And I mean a relevant and competent one, not someone's high-school stat-screwing.
Posted by: Tully | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 02:10 PM
And if you want to abort your babies, don't make the taxpayer pay for it ole Jimbo.
Liberals need to get their focus off other people's lives and stop exporting abortion to third world countries, talk about busy bodies! And then they once again make the American taxpayer pay for it.
Posted by: Ricky | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 03:37 PM
"For the record douchebags, I was in the military for 20+ years (Marine, Beruit 1983) - ya remember the importance of that year in that part of the world? Some thing about our beloved soldiers getting bombed in the barracks. I was there, were you?"
Opening the gate and letting the bomber in, no doubt.
You know what the Obama Party that you support and endorse says about our troops, Jimbo? They're "uninvited and unwanted intruders" IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
http://www.dailycal.org/article/100144/city_council_passes_motions_criticizing_marines_of
You know what the "progressives" that you worship say, Jimbo? That we shouldn't have a military.
http://articles.sfgate.com/2006-02-17/opinion/17283400_1_sandoval-military-tourist-attraction
And you know what else? Your Obama Party is famous for manufacturing fake "veterans" and liars.
http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=3968&MediaType=1&Category=26
Don't you and your fellow Obama voters who spit on our soldiers and call them baby-killers EVER pretend to be veterans again.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 07:14 PM
Oh, it's easy, Mike2Cents.
First, there are greater restrictions on abortion in the UK than there are in the United States.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/aug/27/politics.health
And in Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Germany
In short, the reason the United States has the highest abortion rate is because we allow unlimited abortion. Other countries put limits on it.
Don't you think that more-restrictive laws would lead to fewer abortions, Mike2Cents? Why wasn't that mentioned in your propaganda piece that you quoted? Didn't you think to check that basic, simple thought? Was that too much for you, or were you afraid that you would be called a racist for double-checking the propaganda the Obama Party gives you and orders you to repeat?
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Saturday, March 13, 2010 at 07:24 PM
Jimbo and Mike2cents, keep up the good work and keep the postings comong. And Jimbo,thanks.
Posted by: buckjohnson | Sunday, March 14, 2010 at 02:28 PM
You are one sick mama jama. Must really hurt to hate so much.
Posted by: Aufwuch | Monday, March 15, 2010 at 04:35 PM