« Update 3: Man ID'd - Misses Palin With Tomatoes, Hits Cop In Face | Main | Arizona Dems In The Crosshairs? »

Tuesday, December 08, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20120a72d0902970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Daschle Covered For Baucus' Sexual Harassment Of Staffer:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

someone has it out for Baucus. That's two leaks in a week. the politics of personal destruction is ongoing. what I want to know is why him and why now? Is this payback for his healthcarebill? I would LOVE to get the reasons why. i am sure almost every senator has this stuff in their record. Why him and why now?

I think it's health care, too, un. There may be an even bigger shoe being held back as leverage for a pro or con vote, perhaps?

Perhaps. the fact that the MSM is not going with it seems to suggest it is those that are opposed to healthcare bill (if that is the reason for these leaks), since the MSM is in the tank for the bill. Is there other bills in his committee that are up for a vote. Does he chair over the new finaical regulations being proposed? or cap and tax?


either way I think the GOP should sieze the oppurtunity presented by this news and drive the message of corruption within the Dem party. with $ bill jefferson, Rangel, baucus and others the message could have legs like the house bank scandal in 1994 or the jack ambroff of 2006-08.

however it would take an outsider not part of the establishment to really drive the message home. someone like Palin or even Huck. Mitt seems to close to Dc for his voice to have an impact on something like this.

With Palin being a woman she could play on the "woman outrage" angle more so than a male. A good scandal could derail many bad bills making their way thru Congress until the spring IMO

Scandals don't have much effect on Democrats since they are expected to be low-lifes.

Scandals don't have much effect on Democrats since they are expected to be low-lifes.

Posted by: Lala | Tuesday, December 08, 2009 at 09:26 AM


tha tis only true for strong dem areas. Purple areas and red districts with a dem congresscritter is another story. Remember the bluedogs like bucas ran to the right of the GOP in 2006-2008 esp on social issues like bribery and corruption.

The MSM looks the other way on this, yet has dozens of fact checkers reading "Going Rogue." The Women's Movement is dead. The Democrats killed it with partisanship.

I don't understand how anyone could have believed that the Democrats were going to clean up Congress, but that's what they ran on in 2006, and it worked!

Why him? Why Now?

Because he tried to get his girlfriend a job as US attorney...

And because he is a serial abuser, so these things come out of the closet.

Because he did it!

Some look at the present dirty Democrat senators and ask "Why?". I look at the future to see those seats held by politicians that have honor, and ask "Why not?".
-The ghost of Robert Kennedy

Baucus has 5 years left in his term. A nice ethics scandal and removal from high profile committee positions would neutralize him.

"exceeded a special 90-day filing deadline for suits against members of Congress" - Wait what? Could someone expand on this? I wasn't aware that there was such a thing.

It's simple, Ryan, Congress writes the rules.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad