What's Wrong With This Sarah Palin Event Video?

Update: Video available at link. They hit me with a copyright infringement. Figgers. ;p~ Don't put it out here, if you can't lock it up if you're MSM. Doh!

Funny, especially considering the Left's suggesting that Sarah Palin's appeal is all about sexuality, or that she only appeals to the bitter clingers. The video is from The Roanoke Times. The first person in line slept over, she looks to be Chinese and says she's never done anything like it before. And the rest of the crowd seems to skew young and female. But don't let the facts get in the way of the MSM narrative. These people look just the same as Obama supporters, not what the media would suggest Palin's support is limited to.

Comments

[Joe]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiWgXUuWX-s

The end is near!

[Bob]

"But don't let the facts get in the way of the MSM narrative. These people look just the same as Obama supporters, not what the media would suggest Palin's support is limited to."

Yes, one asian person in an otherwise uniformly white crowd certainly "proves" that Palin receives widespread support from every corner of our society. And the fact that no one was shown to be missing teeth or cooking a dead possum over a bonfire on the sidewalk "proves" that there are no longer any doubts about her qualifications among all college educated Americans everywhere.

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.

[fb274]

Bob, if you dislike Gov. Palin so much, why is it you read and comment on any and all articles concerning her....why waste the time?

[Darth Venomous]

And, Roberta, for you to automatically assume that all conservatives are white proves your racism.

Which makes you a cowardly _racist_ pansy douchebag. Typical of the Left.

[Huey]

Let's see. 98% of Blacks supported Obama. What is the likelihood that a large percentage of blacks would stand in line to buy Sarah's book?

For whatever reason, if whites support a white person, it is racist, but if a black supports a black person, it's not.

I think that, living with such mental dissonance is one of the main reasons for the left's view of the world. After a while, holding such thoughts in one's mind is sure to drive you mad.

Pity, not approbation, is, therefore, the proper response to such as "Bob."

[Bob]

"And, Roberta, for you to automatically assume that all conservatives are white proves your racism.

Which makes you a cowardly _racist_ pansy douchebag. Typical of the Left."

Reading for comprehension, Darth. I would never claim that all conservatives are white. I'm claiming that the video doesn't prove that Sarah Palin has WIDESPREAD support among non-whites just because there's one (and only one) non-white person in it. But it is undeniably true that whites form a disproportionately large segment of conservatives, and so do supporters of Sarah Palin. There's nothing necessarily wrong with that, I guess, but it would be better for Palin and conservatives if they had more non-white supporters, just from the standpoint of getting people elected.

And Darth, the name-calling really just makes you look kinda dumb. But whatever. I'm sure you'll have to respond with more juvenile name-calling now because angry defiance is pretty much all you've got.

[Darth Venomous]

"I would never claim that all conservatives are white."

You as much as said it in your first little bleat. So now you're a _lying_ cowardly racist douchebag. Again, typical of the Left.

"And Darth, the name-calling really just makes you look kinda dumb. But whatever."

This from someone whose idea of "honest debate" starts out with "You know what's wrong with all you wingnuts"?

Let's add "hypocritical" to the list, then. Again, typical.

[A Woman from Down Under]

I am a hispanic that has light brown hair and blue eyes, my husband is also hispanic (blonde and blue eyed), all his family and mine are fair skinned with light eyes. If you would see us you would think we were not hispanics, so how can you be sure that there are not more than one ethnic group represented in the line?

If anybody is a racist, it is the people that are all bothered that there is no more stereotypical racial diversity. So, in other words, you are racist because you expect all hispanics to look the way you perceive that they should look like.

[Bob]

"So now you're a _lying_ cowardly racist douchebag."

It makes you so angry that your impotent name-calling can't do anything to keep me from expressing my opinion, doesn't it, you immature little whiner. I can come around here and say whatever I want and there's nothing you can do to stop me, right, crybaby? But go ahead, whine away. Like I've said before, your emotional immaturity is your problem, not mine.

[Darth Venomous]

"You punk-ass blowhard. I'll keep saying whatever the hell I want and there's nothing you can do about it."

Whassa matter, coward? Can't handle the fact that you're my little bitch, can you? (guffaw)

" I can come around here and say whatever I want and there's nothing you can do to stop me, right, crybaby?"

And I can come around here and expose you for the hypocritical, lying little racist chickens**t that you are, and there's nothing you can do to stop _me_, is there, pu**y?

"But go ahead, whine away. Like I've said before, your emotional immaturity is your problem, not mine."

Which is why you can't let what I'm saying pass, is it, Roberta, you sniveling little wanker? Can't handle the fact I've pwned you, can you, little girl? (snicker)

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.

[Bob]

Sorry, Darth, but I guess you'll have to go back to playing with your action figures. I've got better things to do.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/11/argentina-could-it-happen-here.html?cid=6a00d83451c1db69e20120a6c506b1970b#comment-6a00d83451c1db69e20120a6c506b1970b

[Bob]

"So, in other words, you are racist because you expect all hispanics to look the way you perceive that they should look like."

Why mess with unprovable assumptions based on peoples' outward appearance? The GOP is predominantly white and the polling data says exactly as much. The proportion of hispanics who identify themselves as Republicans is half what it is for Democrats or Independents.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/118937/republican-base-heavily-white-conservative-religious.aspx

"PRINCETON, NJ -- More than 6 in 10 Republicans today are white conservatives, while most of the rest are whites with other ideological leanings; only 11% of Republicans are Hispanics, or are blacks or members of other races. By contrast, only 12% of Democrats are white conservatives, while about half are white moderates or liberals and a third are nonwhite."

The only people in this thread I see accusing others of being racist are the right wingers. You're the only one who said anything about hispanics. Who is the imaginary person you're debating when you say, "you expect all hispanics to look the way you perceive that they should look like"?

[Huey]

You know, there's another way of looking at the "disproportionate" number of minorities who support the socialist agenda of Obama and the Democratic party rather than the rugged individualism of Palin and the Conservatives.

Hmmmm....?

When you ask why so many minorities support a party which attempts to relieve themselves of all personal responsibility, rather than ask why so many whites support conservative values, it tends to put a different slant on things, doesn't it?

Yeah.....it's all in how you pose the question...

[Darth Venomous]

"Sorry, Darth, but I guess you'll have to go back to playing with your action figures. I've got better things to do."

Yeah, like prove to the world that I pwn your ass. ROFL!

[Darth Venomous]

"The only people in this thread I see accusing others of being racist are the right wingers."

Yeah, because the only person in this thread displaying racism is you.

[Bob]

"When you ask why so many minorities support a party which attempts to relieve themselves of all personal responsibility, rather than ask why so many whites support conservative values, it tends to put a different slant on things, doesn't it?"

So you're essentially saying that, in general, minorities have no personal responsibility and white people do, correct? Please explain why that's not a prejudiced assumption on your part.

[Darth Venomous]

"So you're essentially saying that, in general, minorities have no personal responsibility and white people do, correct? Please explain why that's not a prejudiced assumption on your part."

Here's your explanation, Roberta, you dumba**: that's not what Huey said. He said your fellow Demoscum attempt to relieve them of that personal responsibility, not that they didn't have any.

To quote you from earlier, moron-ette: "Reading for comprehension". LOL!!!

[Huey]

It's all in how you pose the question.

You see, the underlying assumption of the posed question was that the Democratic PARTY is one which attempts to relive the individual of personal responsibility.

You can argue that all you wish.

But, once you've accepted the underlying premise, then one must ask why do minorities support the Democratic Party in overwhelming numbers?

Or, I suppose, one could ask, why are whites (in general) more conservative than are minorities (at least as established by the party and the candidates for whom they vote)?

Heh.

Same question...different focus...

Discuss...

[x11b1p]

Darth Venomous has weighed and measured you Bob, and found you to be wanting. (appropriate quote from H. Ledger I think). You are no different than the slaves the Frederick Dougals wrote about that would argue with other slaves about the matter of whose Master was the best after getting tuned up. It amazes me that you are content with being told by Master Uncle Sam what to do, when to do it and how to do it, you want more of it and would argue against freedom just so long as its your Master running the plantation. I suspect that had you been a slave in the fledgling years of this country Bob, you would have been the best damn slave on the farm when it came to defending the Master! Its a shame that even today, Democrats still refuse to accepet the history of the Democratic party when it came to slavery and racism. I guess thats why Dems can spot a racist from a 1000 meters away, it takes one to know one. Oh yea - how is that Kleagle Sen. Byrd who fillibustered against the 1964 Civil Rights Act doing these days with his health Bob - He would have made a good master I bet huh Bob?

[Ran / Si Vis Pacem]

Sez more about the media and why it's dying.

Dan, I'm getting the impression that this Administration is American Progressivism's last chance to turn-up heat on the frog-pot, and they blew it. These people in the video are the frogs jumping. The Independents are jumping from the Parties. There is some serious dial-back in the works.

Palin is meeting a huge untapped demand for Classical Liberalism. Whether she choses to run or merely support another candidate won't matter: The Base is demanding a better product and it will get it. The platform will be something that includes restoring Liberty and limiting Government to it's Constitutional role... That's the only way we can re-build the crashing Dollar.

Awesome blog... Keep rollin'.

[Bob]

"I suspect that had you been a slave in the fledgling years of this country Bob, you would have been the best damn slave on the farm when it came to defending the Master!"

Why, because I'm in favor of universal healthcare? Wingnuts like you, i-before-e-except-after-c, have reached the point where your "narrative" is now absolutely incoherent. But that's how the teabag lobbyists want it. As long as rubes like you are demonizing people who are concerned about "evil" things like healthcare, they figure it'll be that much easier to invade Iran or inflict more predatory financial practices on the middle class.

[Darth Venomous]

"And Darth, the name-calling really just makes you look kinda dumb."

-Roberta, 14:50 hours, this date, this thread

"_Wingnuts like you_, i-before-e-except-after-c, have reached the point where your "narrative" is now absolutely incoherent. But that's how the teabag lobbyists want it. As long as _rubes like you_ are demonizing people who are concerned about "evil" things like healthcare" (Something resembling emphasis added - HTML would be nice someday, Dan.)

-Roberta, approximately six hours later.

And the hypocritical, cowardly little d-bag wonders why no one takes him seriously here, despite his whining and foot-stamping.

Here's a hint, Roberta: Try living up to your own standard sometime. Maybe then you can get some of that "honest debate" about which you keep sniveling. (chuckle)

[x11b1p]

"As long as rubes like you are demonizing people who are concerned about "evil" things like healthcare, they figure it'll be that much easier to invade Iran or inflict more predatory financial practices on the middle class".

I doubt calling you a fool has any effect considering that you have heard it so many times it has lost its meaning. However, what the hell - not only are you a fool, you most likely carry a card in your wallet taped to the back of your voter id card that spell out the word FOOL -just incase you forget to take your meds and are found wandering around on the streets of what ever city you live in.

Like I asked you several weeks ago, I'll ask you again:

Go down to your local hospital and volunteer to pay for someone's medical bill in the ER who has no insurance. Isn't that what HCR is all about? Show by example Bob that you put your money where your mouth is and pay for those who can't. Or, is it more your style to sit back and tell everyone to do what you are not willing to do yourself? Most of us refer to that as being a typical liberal.

Once again Bob - you would have been the best damn "yesa maza" slave on the farm. And, anyone willing to agree to give up their freedom as long as everyone has to do the same is a damn FOOL!

Who is calling for the invasion of Iran? I thought that Obama was such a Master at negotiations and foregin policy that the he would convince the Iranians to give up the Nuke Bomb quest? I wonder, what will you say if Iran denotates a Nuke? You will probably blame it on the Jooos, just like your boy's pastor the Rev. Wright.

Predatory Financial practices? You mean the Federal Government taxing its citizens for a failed stimulus, bailouts on Wall Street, bailouts for two car companies that still can't turn a profit, and the mysterious creation of jobs in CDs that don't even exist. Is that what you are talking about Bob when it comes to predatory finacial practices, or are you mad b/c the interest rate on your credit card that got a bailout in Feb just raised your interest rate to 30% b/c you paid your bill late?

After typing all this I just realized, why am I responding to a card carrying Fool?

[Scrapiron]

BWAHAHAHAHA, Liberal are in a panic about the little 'lady' from Alaska. Va is a right to work and a right to carry state. Why didn't someone consider it their days work to put a few 9MM rounds in the egg throwing democrat AH? The rest would run home and hide under momma's petticoat for months. When you look at the democrats today you know the saying, 'you can't fix stupid' is true. The entire democrat party is a criminal enterprise and one of these days all of those in D.C. will go to jail ($300 million in bribes to the whore from La) or be wiped out. Here's hoping for a massive terrorists attack on D.C. as soon as the dhimmi's get back togather to save the taxpayers the cost of keeping them in prison. President O'Dumbo has accidently admitted twice that he's a radical Islamic plant. Wake up people. Teleprompter failure will soon bury him. Now the most hated person in America. 11 months to reach below 50% approval. Has that ever happened before?

[Huey]

Bob, what conservatives understand is that, when you politicize health care, you make the citizenry DEPENDENT on government.

We would have to petition for our health care. Sometimes individually, but mostly in groups. Lobbies for particular diseases so that they receive budgeted health care dollars.

As such, our concerns for health care would be foremost in our minds every time we go into the voting booth. Those wishing power would race to offer us more in an effort to buy our votes and conservatives would be rooted out of office since they would be the ones who would be forced to tell the citizens that there had to be some budget discipline.

Everyone who is even marginally politically aware remembers the debacle when Republicans dared to push for a reduction in the GROWTH of medicare. This reduction in growth (an actual INCREASE in spending) was likened to the Republicans putting Grandma out into the streets. And, of course, the "rubes" bought it and even that meager reduction in growth couldn't be effected.

Conservatives believe such dependency on Government is a bad idea. It's really that simple. Nothing evil about their viewpoint. And, they don't think there's anything evil about "universal health care," just how it's arrived at, i.e., by extracting the money from those who produce and distributing it to others while retaining the power of its distribution in the hands of politicians.

Surely, we can trust Frank, Dodd, Rangle and others with our medical care, can't we? They've proven so ethical in the handling of the other issues of which they have had the care, haven't they?

[Bob]

"Go down to your local hospital and volunteer to pay for someone's medical bill in the ER who has no insurance. Isn't that what HCR is all about? Show by example Bob that you put your money where your mouth is and pay for those who can't."

Sure thing, R2D2, when you pony up yourself to purchase that new nuclear submarine. Or are you so lazy that you want to sit back and tell everyone to do what you are not willing to do yourself? Most of us refer to that as being a typical wingnut hypocrite.

But of course you're not interested in a real discussion. You're too filled with rage and bitterness because your side screwed things up so badly when they were in charge that the voters threw them out. You have no ideas. All you do is wallow in your emotions and bitch while other people try to do something constructive. Again, that's WHY your side was voted out. You have nothing positive to offer.

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Sure thing, R2D2, when you pony up yourself to purchase that new nuclear submarine. Or are you so lazy that you want to sit back and tell everyone to do what you are not willing to do yourself?"

Actually, we already pay taxes to cover that. Perfectly constitutional and legitimate, inasmuch as the Constitution clearly talks about "to provide for the common defense", and perfectly sensible, since no one individual could afford a multimillion-dollar nuclear submarine that truly protects millions of people.

However, another individual's health insurance does not cost nearly as much, nor does it provide the same value to society. In short, that's a spurious comparison, being made as a dishonest argument by a talking-points repeater to avoid taking responsibility for his own demands.

Furthermore, Bob, since you and your Obama Party don't pay taxes, as we've seen from your tax cheat party leaders like Geithner, Rangel, Solis, Sebelius, Daschle, and others, this truly IS a case of you demanding of others what you won't pay yourself. The vast majority of people to whom you want to give "health care" will not work or pay taxes; they will simply steal from those who do.

Why should you get free health care at other peoples' expense, Bob? Why should other people who do work and earn their health coverage be taxed because you are a moocher who is too lazy to work and too uneducated to actually create value for society? Why do Obama Party members like yourself refuse to pay your taxes,Bob, even as you raise them on others?

[Larry Sheldon]

Reminds me of waiting for the Rose Pared years ago.

[Larry Sheldon]

Let's see if I can get simple spelling correct....

Reminds me of waiting for the Rose Parade years ago.

[Bob]

"Why should you get free health care at other peoples' expense, Bob?"

Why should you get "free" police protection? Why should you get "free" water and sewer service? Why should your roads be paved for you? It's simply a matter of political will. And if it's done by a democratic process, then there's really not much basis for you to claim that there's anything unfair about it, is there?

And again, North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell, what's with your bizarre habit of making things up about people? I have an education and a job that's probably way cooler than yours. I pay my taxes and contribute to society probably more than you do. One thing I DON'T have to do is make up bizarre lies about people I wouldn't pretend to know. This tendendy of yours makes you completely untrustworthy, because you seem to make no distinction at all between fact and fiction. I'd have serious doubts about any coworker or acquaintance who seemed to be so willing to make things up and tell lies like you.

[Darth Venomous]

"Or are you so lazy that you want to sit back and tell everyone to do what you are not willing to do yourself? Most of us refer to that as being a typical wingnut hypocrite."

Yeah, just like the cowardly little racist d-bag who plays crybaby when I call him names, yet is only too happy to refer to conservatives as "wingnuts" and "rubes". (Within six hours of each other, I might add.)

Soros needs to cut off Roberta's compensation package. Clearly, he's not getting his money's worth.

"You're too filled with rage and bitterness because your side screwed things up so badly when they were in charge that the voters threw them out. You have no ideas. All you do is wallow in your emotions and bitch while other people try to do something constructive. Again, that's WHY your side was voted out. You have nothing positive to offer."

And all you leftards have is tired, old, proven-failed socialism.

Then again, I guess that's why your homie's numbers are down to 48%. BWAH-HAHAHA...!!!

http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Job-Approval.aspx

[Bob]

It seems that North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell has a habit of this tactic of making up falsehoods and mischaracterizations in the course of arguing with people in comments sections. Here's a response from someone at the Independent Gay Forum who takes issue with North Dallas Thirty about his mischaracterizations. It sounds very familiar:

http://www.indegayforum.org/topics/show/31414.html

"Objecting to your relentless vitriol does not begin to make me your equal in that department. You spew it constantly, as if you are professionally angry (just like many leftists, BTW) and determined to misdirect that anger to people who do not at all resemble your stereotype. If rebuking a sociopath makes me a sociopath as well, that means that no one can ever call out anyone who destroys the ability to have a reasonable online discussion. We just have to endure it no matter what. I don't think so. ND30, this isn't just about who can come up with the cleverest riposte. There is ample evidence that what I say is true and that what you say is false. This is one of the basic truths that you are not getting, that you think you can change with a lot of big talk.

Your stuff? Do you publish under "North Dallas Thirty"? Or do I have to go back and do a search for the last time you admitted your real name? The only times I can recall asking you to read my stuff was in response to your blatant mischaracterizations of what I wrote. No doubt that sounds to you like a desperate plea for readers. I will be happy to read everything of yours that is published by IGF.

I suppose the reason I waste so much time responding to you is that I find it truly amazing that someone can so obsessively mischaracterize the views of others--especially when the record of what they wrote is right there for all to see. Who are we gonna believe, you or our lying eyes?"

Indeed!

[Darth Venomous]

"It seems that North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell has a habit of this tactic of making up falsehoods and mischaracterizations in the course of arguing with people in comments sections."

This from a jackass who accused me in comments of wearing an Ewok costume, based on my choice of screen name.

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/11/argentina-could-it-happen-here.html?cid=6a00d83451c1db69e20120a6c2944d970b#comment-6a00d83451c1db69e20120a6c2944d970b

{Yeah, it sounds silly - but that's all of which Roberta is capable, so you take what you can get.)

Now it appears as if [s]he's realized [s]he can't win an argument with ND30 on her own merits, so [s]he has to bring in bleatings from some independent heterophobe's forum.

My little Internetwebtubes bitch has gotten quite desperate, hasn't she? (guffaw)

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Why should you get "free" police protection? Why should you get "free" water and sewer service? Why should your roads be paved for you?"

Unfortunately for that argument, Bob, I don't get them "free"; I pay city property taxes, I pay a water and sewer bill, and I pay gas taxes.

The only way you could possibly think that those are free is if you paid none of those things -- which is why your statements make it obvious that you don't pay taxes and you don't pay bills. You're just a moocher, a leech on society who is too lazy to get an education or to work and certainly has no intention of paying taxes.

This really is a problem with society. Moochers and leeches like Bob simply have no concept or intellectual capacity to understand that the only place from which government gets money is to take it from someone else. They, like their ignorant Barack Obama, think they can just continue to take, take, take, take from the productive without negatively affecting them.

Perhaps if Bob were intellectually curious or educated, he would be aware of the research definitively showing that tax increases cause not only a decrease in GDP, but an increase in unemployment.

http://www.blnz.com/news/2008/12/25/Roads_Lead_Romer_3472.html

[Bob]

More commentary about North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell's online habits:

"Personally, I think attributing your relentless viciousness and dishonesty on these comment boards to mental illness is more charitable than assuming conscious and willful mendacity. In any case, your pointless obnoxiousness is far worse than my responses to it. You won't acknowledge and apologize for your malicious and silly lies, but it would do you a world of good if you did."

"Pointless obnoxiousness." Yes, it's definitely the same North Dallas Whatever.

[Bob]

Yes, my own experiences with North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell are definitely not unique. He seems to have quite a reputation over at the Independent Gay Forum:

http://www.independentgayforum.com/topics/show/31344.html

Richard J. Rosendall | September 18, 2007, 3:15pm | #
ND30, your unscrupulousness never ceases to amaze me.

"as the record you like to cite indicates, you'd be launching mass protests, press conferences at City Hall, etc."

Um, that does not resemble my record at all.

Go ahead and make stuff up. Anyone who sees what you do and would trust your characterization of me is an idiot.

I wrote, "But the greater point is that outing is a sleazy tactic that capitalizes on homophobia, and is therefore troubling even if it can be justified in particular cases." You characterize this as a justification of outing. Do you know what the word "if" means? Can you even read a sentence honestly? You know perfectly well that I was saying virtually the opposite of what you claim. As to my being "surrounded by" people like Rogers, I completely disagree with his approach to activism, and I just wrote a piece criticizing him. Of course I used a civil tone, which is something foreign to you. I didn't even know who Rogers was three years ago. How exactly am I responsible for keeping track of what everyone else is doing, and how does my failure to denounce every radical leftist conceivably constitute tacit endorsement of them? These are non-sequiturs and cheap smears, and are typical of your habit of making everything as personal and vicious as possible. You are a sociopath, sir.

In fact, I've used the word "sociopath" to describe ND30's obsessive lying too. I think there's a pattern here. What's really sad is that this post is from a couple of years ago, and North Dallas Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell is still obviously in need of professional help.

[Darth Venomous]

Po' widdle Roberta. Been exposed as a absolute poser over here, so he has to import his arguments from other places.

Here's another clue, moron-ette: I doubt many over here are going to give two fat rat's asses what anyone over in the Heterophobes' Hideaway think about ND30.

You've lost whatever credibility you had here. Not that it was that much in the first place.

Now go on, Roberta. Let's hear some more whimpering about ND30. Dance, bitch, dance! (guffaw)

[Darth Venomous]

"going to give two fat rat's asses what anyone over in the Heterophobes' Hideaway think"

Make that "thinks".

[Larry Sheldon]

Video is DMCA'd still at http://www.roanoke.com/multimedia/video/wb/227300 but incredibly slow.

I quess the don't want your help.

Unless the can force it out of you.

[North Dallas Thirty]

It's no surprise that Bob is quoting Independent Gay Forum; if he reads a bit more, he'll find out that his fellow liberal who he's quoting is also a supporter of men having sex in public restrooms, men soliciting and masturbating in front of children in public restrooms, of screaming "entrapment" when the police arrest men for doing either, and of legalizing prostitution.

We should also see the other things that Bob and his fellow liberals support and endorse.

Taking children dressed as sex slaves to a sex fair for an "educational experience":

http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/004352.html

Teaching five-year-olds gay sex in the classroom:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html?Gay

Considering it "homophobic" to investigate and stop gays from sexually abusing children:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-480151/Gay-couple-left-free-abuse-boys--social-workers-feared-branded-homophobic.html

[Bob]

"It's no surprise that Bob is quoting Independent Gay Forum; if he reads a bit more, he'll find out that his fellow liberal who he's quoting is also a supporter of men having sex in public restrooms . . ."

Show us where he says he supports those things. Of course, you're lying as always, aren't you? You really ARE a sociopath.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Show us where he says he supports those things. Of course, you're lying as always, aren't you? You really ARE a sociopath."

LOL....so you demand evidence, but state that I am lying prior to seeing it.

In that case, you make it clear that the evidence is irrelevant and that your prejudice and bigotry take precedence over any facts.

Not that this surprises us, mind you.

[unseen]

well considering that america is STILL 70-75% white. I would imagine any line that is a cross section of America would be mostly white. The MSM wants people to think that minorities are equal to the majority in numbers when taken together however that isn't so. The Media has stated that not unitl 2050 (IF PRESENT DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS CONTINUE which they most likely will not) will the TOTAL of all minorities equal the majority white population. As of now 70-75% of America is white, around 10-12% is black, about 13-15% is Latino (which is a collection of all hispanic groups such as cubans, mexicians etc with their own cultures unlike the black population which is kind of monolithic in its culture) and the rest is Asian/pacfic islander, eskimo, native american etc.

The MSM narrative gives more power to minorities because they want them to have more power. The fact is that a politican can lose every minority vote in this country and still win the majority vote if they get around 60% of the white vote. This is why prior to Obama no minority candidate every won a national election. Obama was considered a non racist politician out not for his race but for everyone. His style of governning has brought a lie to that idea and his white support has fled. If he continues to paint everyone as a racist who do not agree with him, he has the possibility of losing the majority of white voters and in so doing his presidency.

[x11b1p]

Bob, please tell me how I can own part of a Nuclear Sub? Your analogy is weak (ND30 did a good job explaining your foolishness for using it), however lets compare apples to apples, I asked you to go and pay for someone's hc down at your local er, and you responed by telling me to go pay for a submarine. Okay Bob, how do I go and pay for a submarine, one that the US Gov uses in the Navy? Please Bob show me how big your brain is by detailing out how I can go and throw down a couple grand and own part of it (outside of paying taxes), I want to know b/c I would love to do so Bob. I think owning part of a sub would be cool. Funny, I don't see you saying the same thing about paying for someone's hc. Instead you want everyone else to pay for your hc b/c you want to feed from the trough. You are a poor excuse of a man/woman, and a sorry ass excuse of a citizen. I wonder what you will do Bob if our country goes bankrupt and those gov checks from the master stop coming in? If that happens let me know, I will gladly by you some sterno and a bean pie, and I will even throw in a new cardboard box for you to use. Thats more than you are willing to do for someone who has no health insurance.

[Bob]

"LOL....so you demand evidence, but state that I am lying prior to seeing it.

In that case, you make it clear that the evidence is irrelevant and that your prejudice and bigotry take precedence over any facts.

Not that this surprises us, mind you."

In other words, I was right to recognize yet another of your lies and call your bluff. And in fact I'm correct. You WERE lying and mischaracterizing this person's views, and you have no proof to back up your dishonest claims. I GOTCHA again, you liar. You have a clear record of fabricating false accusations about people, and you apparently do it with no sense of right or wrong. That makes you a sociopath.

[Bob]

"Bob, please tell me how I can own part of a Nuclear Sub?"

That example is just a little educational aid for right wing extremists like you. It's a counterpoint to your silly and disingenuous suggestion that I should personally attend to the needs of the uninsured. The government provides many useful services, like air traffic control, infrastructure development, the FBI, the CIA, etc, that everybody's taxes contribute to and the vast majority of Americans -- even most conservatives -- recognize as critical needs. That doesn't make it socialism; it makes it a fully functioning government.

And I note again the blatant hypocrisy of people like you all of a sudden pretending to be concerned about deficits after having said nothing at all while the Bush administration ran up debts that still amount to the vast majority of our yearly deficits.

[MIke2Cents]

Cue the "we were critical of Bush deficits , too" revisionism.

Also, to the actual point of the post -
Without saying it matters one way or the other, it's just silly for Dan to offer that seeing someone who 'looks' Chinese suggests any broadening of her base...or that the accepted narrative of where her support lies, demographically speaking, is wrong.
Lame post, silly assertion.
It could only find oxygen here...