Sarah Palin's Uterus Swallows Andy Sullivan

It's bizarre enough as it is reading Sarah Palin's uterus' blog. But to think that she actually follows Andy Sullivan? At least, it may explain some things.

How would you feel if you were a gay man and a uterus was following you on the Internet? It isn't that I'm surprised Andy is being stalked by a sexual organ out here. It just isn't the gender I actually had in mind.

There. I said it and I don't care who knows! I am utterly, madly, passionately addicted to The Daily Dish. At first I was a bit creeped out by Sully's obsession with me. But let's face it, who else out there shows any interest in my accomplishments? Ever since Trig moved out, the media won't give me the time of day . Life has gotten pretty dull around here. I can't remember the last time Vanity Fair tried to get me to give them the inside scoop about Sarah "off the record" (wink, wink...nudge, nudge).

Comments

[Al in St. Lou]

"My mission in life: to drive Andrew Sullivan batsh*t insane. From what I hear, it may be a short trip."

LOL funny!

[Al in St. Lou]

I'm skeptical that Sarah Palin's uterus can keep making posts that are so funny--unless Sully starts responding. He's not that nuts, tho. I mean he can't be that nuts.

[jpc]

About time to dig up that issue of Bizzare Sex #4 (underground comix) with the infamous cover that shows a spaceship (shaped like a certain part of the female anatomy)impaling itself on a skyscraper. Can't find the actual image on-line, though, just the white "warning" top cover put on to protect retailers.

[Bob]

# hits for a Google search for:

Dan Riehl: 415,000

Andrew Sullivan: 2,400,000

Ratio of how much more significant Sullivan is than Riehl: 5.8 times

Who's the ankle-biter here? Yes, it's Dan Riehl. Who's the one whose blog will always be a forgotten, benighted backwater? Yes, it's Dan Riehl. Dan, maybe if you scream loud enough you'll make Sullivan notice you. Isn't this all just a desperate, jealous plea for attention on your part?

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.

[zaugg]

# hits for a Google search for:

Dan Riehl: 415,000

Bob, the troll: 0

Ratio of how much more Dan Riehl is than Bob, the troll: 415,000 times.

But thanks for playing Bob.

[john]

Bob,

Are you still going on about numbers being indicative of quality?

I suppose I could make a remark about how flawed an analytical method that is. I could also wonder aloud just how pathetic you are for posting on a blog you claim is worthless.

But rather than make fun of you, which is pretty much fish in a barrel (e.g. you're so far up Sullivan's ass his boyfriend is jealous), I figure I'll just use this as an opportunity to wish that Sullivan is haunted by uteri for the rest of his life.

[Bob]

"Ratio of how much more Dan Riehl is than Bob, the troll: 415,000 times."

Oh, zaugg, now that wasn't an honest experiment and you know it. You added that poison pill phrase "the troll" which of course doesn't refer to me. See at the bottom of my posts where it says, "Posted by: Bob"? Do you see "the troll" down there? I didn't THINK so!! So let's do this experiment right. Doing a google search for "Bob":

Bob: 226,000,000 (I'm not kidding! I didn't make this up!)

Dan Riehl: 415,000 (still hasn't changed since earlier)

Ratio of Dan Riehl to Bob: 0.0018 (Ouch!)

I hope you're not one of those, "the dog ate my spreadsheet" kind of guys. Because I'm gonna CHECK your calculations, buddy. Don't think you can sneak any shoddy work past THIS peer review process.

[Bob]

"Bob,

Are you still going on about numbers being indicative of quality?"

No, it's indicative of SIGNIFICANCE, not necessarily quality. The quality issue is taken care of by Sullivan's WebLog Awards "Best Blog" for 2008, which, I predict, Dan's blog couldn't win in a million years.

I do think Sullivan's blog is pretty interesting. I appreciate his open-mindedness. He brings in commentary from the widest range of sources on any blog, I think. They have lots of interesting fun features like "The View from Your Window" and "Mental Health Break," music videos, etc. I also appreciate his (usual) willingness to admit when he's wrong. Basically, the approach that y'all take around here is so petty that you do yourselves a disservice by it. You could treat the disagreements with Sullivan in a serious and substantive way, but instead all you seem to be able to do is make queer jokes. That says a lot about you, and nothing of any significance about him.

[Jim Ryan]

>I do think Sullivan's blog is pretty interesting. I appreciate his open-mindedness.

Trigg Truther, Bob? And do you like the 911 Truth sites, too? I hear some of them have nutrition/fitness features.

[Bob]

"Trigg Truther, Bob?"

I guess I'm not interested enough to really care about the Trig thing. It's a family thing. Who cares? 9/11 Truthers are mostly assholes as far as I can tell. Just like Birthers.

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.

[Elmo]

Bob | Friday, November 20, 2009 at 10:46 PM

And to think, it only took three thousand lives, vaporized. And two more years after that, of kind, decent, generous souls holding my hand. Until I was Bob no more.

Signed, starting to warm up to that G*d thing (there, but for the grace of ...)

[Sarah Palin's Uterus]

I AM NOT A STALKER!!!!

I think this is a very mean spirited post, Mr. Dan Riehl blogger person. Somehow, I expected something more... warm and fuzzy.

*sigh*

[Bob]

"Signed, starting to warm up to that G*d thing (there, but for the grace of ...)"

Apparently it's really true that religion is like a drug to some people.

[O!]

Bob, thank you for that additional helping of Journolist/Axelturf talking point spam.

2010.