No link. Just got tipped to it from a reliable source in New York. Dede Scozzafava must have recorded a call for Democrat Owens. Sounds like she's determined to pay the GOP back, but not for the wasted million-plus.
« Sir Charlie Rangle: Here Comes The Knight | Main | NJ: Christie Up By 6 In New Jersey »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20120a69e30ac970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NY - 23: Scozzafava Doing Robo Calls For Owens:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
I honestly still can't believe this. It's like straight out of a movie.
Shameful.
Posted by: Randy Haddock | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Wonder if there is a cause of action here against her by the GOP? Some sort of breach of implied contract?
Posted by: NeoconBlonde | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 08:54 PM
Breach of employment contract? Implied noncompete? She applied and interviewed for, essentially hired by the local GOP [in this instance because there was no primary] the position of endorsed GOP candidate and was selected for the job. The mere fact that she dropped out could qualify as a breach because she didn't even see the election through. Possible fraud action?
Have not seen anything on Volokh yet.
Posted by: NeoconBlonde | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 09:01 PM
I doubt it. It isn't business, it's political activity. She has constitutional rights like anyone else. We wouldn't want to start making political acts actionable. Besides, it could be argued the GOP rejected her. Look at the high profile Republicans who endorsed the Conservative Party candidate.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 09:41 PM
You are now in the twilight zone - followed by the death and torture zone. Welcome.
Posted by: Doug_s | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:00 PM
With RNC dollars.
I'd sure like to see the FEC report on this one.
Posted by: Larry Sheldon | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:00 PM
Bad Dede . . . no bisquit!
Posted by: Nick Reynolds | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:01 PM
The Republican Party ENDORSED HER. Paid her bills.
All this says to me, paraphrasing a Arizona Cardinal coach, that Scozzafava was who we thought she was.
If you are fiscally liberal, you should expect the axe. Enough of this. The tea parties (which I've never attended, but support) aren't about agendas, they're about monetary responsibility. That is severely lacking in our political class.
Even if Hoffman loses, I think this has been a valuable exercise for 2010.
Posted by: Scott | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:04 PM
This woman deserves to be ostarcized by decent people. She was the Republican pick. Goes to show you how BAD the Republican Party Apparatus is in in New York State.
RINOs are going to have an increasingly difficult time in the future in the Republican Party. If you don't respect and believe in the US Constitution and Liberty it's time to RETIRE from leadership in the Republican Party. Bye Bye RINOs.
Posted by: jgreene | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:05 PM
Scozzafava needs to be thrown out of the Republican Party regardless of the state office she holds.
http://nygoe.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/scozzafava-endorses-democrat-instead-of-conservative/
It is long past time to take back control and put it in the hands of adults.
Posted by: Dan Maloney | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:40 PM
LOL! The GOP deserves what they're getting. Anyone talking about "breach of contract" should be tarred and feathered. You think the GOP is YOUR friend????
Posted by: Dante | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Smells like the fix was in from the beginning. When Obama nominated McHugh the leftists conspired to put two candidates on the ballot, one on the Republican ticket and one in the Democrat ticket.
Posted by: El Duende | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 11:09 PM
B-b-b-but, this was a Stalinist purge! Frank Rich said it was!
See the surprising historical parallels between NY-23 and Soviet politics.
Frank Rich: Ghost Light Out
Posted by: naturalfake | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 11:20 PM
Ya pays your money & ya takes yer chances
or
This is what happens when you're stupid
& short sighted
Don't bother to save your receipt
But use it next time you excrete
She's just without shame
And morally lame
Filled with self serving deceit
....nnnn..'o.o'..uu!u....algie
Illegitimi nOn carborundum
Posted by: algie | Sunday, November 01, 2009 at 11:40 PM
We've been thrown under the "Pelosi-Couch" by Newt's pick...AGAIN!
Posted by: CHRI$ DODD | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 12:14 AM
Hey, NY GOP, you morons, got an answer for Dede?
It's time, folks, to Google your local GOP committee and be there at their next meeting. A whole lot of house cleaning needs to be done everywhere locally. Betcha too many of them on the committees are aging quasi-lib(RINO) females that have done the most damage to both parties. PTA types with their silly feely stuff always in play do not serve the real world and real politics well. I'm a female, so it isn't sexist, it's reality.
Guys, we need your counter-weight.
Posted by: penny | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 12:40 AM
RNC money? no problem. I hope it hurt them. They're just not going to be getting any of my money to play their game. They haven't since about 2006.
Posted by: Calypso Jones | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 07:41 AM
Penny, you saying that it isn't sexist because you are a female is like when a black person uses the N-word and says it isn't racist. I'm sorry, but there are plenty of socially liberal Republican women [read pro-choice, gay rights, ERA supporters] who don't condone the rampant taxing and spending. Besides, all the PTA types I know [and such is my world right now. LOL] are more more traditionalists than "feely".
Posted by: NeoconBlonde | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 09:15 AM
Neo, my local Repub committee is 5 female, 2 male, so maybe penny has a point. I will say that the women on this committee are more concerned about how they look to the community than the men. For instance, they don't want to look too radical, which plays into the hands of the Democrats in some ways. However, it is important to weed out the true radicals, some of whom want Texas to seceed and silliness like that. Perhaps it's some of both.
Posted by: templar knight | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 09:42 AM
There have been plenty of male spend-happy Republicans [I do not like using the term moderate as many moderates are not spend-happy, but just socially liberal on civil liberty issues] running around who have caused as much, if not more, damage to the conservative brand/classical liberalism.
Posted by: NeoconBlonde | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 10:05 AM
The world is out of wack!
Posted by: erictheolson | Monday, November 02, 2009 at 12:50 PM