WTF? Is this just hyper-reaction to something given the other big problems that emerged? Or is the earth doing okay and it's the Global Warming scientists that are suddenly melting down? More data manipulation out of New Zealand discovered? If it's true, whoa!
UPDATE 15:49 NZDT - NIWA's news release in response to this story appears to have been delayed, and according to a radio news report a few minutes ago Rodney Hide, leader of the minority Act Party and a minister in the National Government, is now calling on his Cabinet colleague, Climate Change Minister Nick Smith, to "please explain" [normal transmission now resumes]
The New Zealand Government's chief climate advisory unit NIWA is under fire for allegedly massaging raw climate data to show a global warming trend that wasn't there.
The scandal breaks as fears grow worldwide that corruption of climate science is not confined to just Britain's CRU climate research centre.


WATERLOO!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpUz5zXywhY
Posted by: unseen | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 01:54 AM
I think I'll buy a new Challenger Hemi and do burnouts all-day to celebrate, LOL
Posted by: Reaganite Republican | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 02:28 AM
well I guess the reason for the gov to tell me how hot/cold to keep my house just went up in CO2 smoke
Posted by: unseen | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 03:06 AM
but then again there are still some people that believe that the earth is flat and that the Sun revolves around us. So I'm sure the globalwarming crap will be around awhile longer...
Posted by: unseen | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 03:08 AM
Not a fatal blow, but the dike just sprung another leak. It will take a few years before these clowns run out of fingers. They're all still doubling down
Posted by: PA | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 04:06 AM
The truth is that ALL government sponsored science is susceptible to this problem. All the medical science on cholesterol, triglycerides, trans-fat. The research that got DDT banned, PCBs etc., etc. Climate change fraud was more ambitious and had less smart fraudsters perpetrating it (not many PhD programs in meterology). How much of this ultimately comes out? We will have to wait and see, but remember, the US National Academy of Sciences and Britain's Royal Society backed global warming to the hilt, so if global warming is fraud, the entire scientific establishment is tainted (and the MSM, but that's another story for another day).
Posted by: Brian | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 08:29 AM
If the political left likes it I'm suspicious, no matter what it is.
Anyway, here's a long article from Michael Crichton written in 2003
http://www.crichton-official.com/speech-alienscauseglobalwarming.html
Posted by: Lala | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 09:01 AM
Crichton is sorely missed now when he and brilliant antagonists to the barrage of CRU and NIWA faked and massaged "data" aiming at a socialist/elitist takeover of our property and income. Or at least a lion cub's share of it. A couple years back, suspiciously high temps from a certain part of the US were traced back to the local NOAA thermometers being placed near air conditioning vents which boosted the ambient celsius up a notch or two. I wonder how many cottage industry fakes and frauds out there are sending in crude unprocessed data certified by public administrative bodies with a meteorological bias towards AGW?
Looks like guerrilla warfare on their side deserves a just riposte.
Posted by: daveinboca | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 09:15 AM
They're already starting their "Wizard of Oz" campaign telling us all not to pay attention to the emails behind the curtain. They are insufferable ignorant idealogues and weak-minded idiots. The "Jet-Set" environmentalists like Gore, Babs, and Obama that dump more CO2 in a day than an entire bovine-filled small country does in a year should be relieved.
Posted by: Dave B | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 09:28 AM
Brian,
I had been under the impression that there was NO research at all relied upon to ban DDT; but, aside from that you're absolutely right. The problem is really bigger than that, though. In addition to the fact that most science is funded by the gov't to one extent or another, the "scientists" (read university profs) doing most of said "research" are ideologically motivated and ideologically leftist. This is all largely a side effect of the monopoly the left has over academia in this country.
On top of that, envirocoms (enviro-commies) have suffered from diminishing returns. There were once legitimate pollution problems in America, but they were largely SOLVED by the mid 1980's. But, the EPA, having been created, still needed a reason to exist. Now envirocom professors do some "research" showing that this or that will kill us, or wildlife, or plants, or the entire planet, or cause cancer; the envirocom lobbyists push the issue with leftist Congress-things; and Congress mandates that EPA regulate -- ALL based on trumped up science designed to give them something to bitch about since the environment in America has already been cleaned up for 20 years or more.
And you're also right about NAS. They are the worst. A combination of leftist professors and leftist bureaucrats - what could be worse. I dealt with them on a couple of EPA drinking water regulations, and they simply backed EPA's bogus "science" for purely political/ideological reasons.
More or less ALL science in this country is tainted to one degree or another.
Posted by: Uriel | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 10:10 AM
if polar bears could talk then we could get to the truth about global warming!
Posted by: x11b1p | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 10:13 AM
A perfectly valid rounding (0.06 to 0.92 C). Obama used the same method for rounding "jobs saved or created". See - it's an established technique, and the debate is over.
Posted by: MDr | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 10:25 AM
Lies told and Gore and Obama hold Nobel Prizes?
Hang them both.
Posted by: Old Trooper | Thursday, November 26, 2009 at 04:28 PM
In a one of those “shades of Haliburton” moments, we find out that Barack Obama’s radical socialist climate czar Carol Browner was a board member of one of the leading carbon offset trading companies, APX. No wonder she rejected claims that e-mails stolen from a British university show climate scientists trumped up global warming numbers, saying she considers the science settled.
Posted by: Neo | Friday, November 27, 2009 at 12:23 PM
oh my god! I can't believe scientists adjust data from different sources to make the different data useful!
Oy.
Posted by: cb | Friday, November 27, 2009 at 03:01 PM
Al Gore and company need to be skewered on the end of the hockey stick. What a globally warming farce! Obama is a sham and nothing more than a puppet. I pray America wakes the hell up!
Posted by: Steve Boston | Sunday, November 29, 2009 at 01:49 AM
Gr8 post.. Hey unseen i couldn't seen your video because now its not exist there.. Anyways i got a good information from here so thanks a lot for this nice post.
Posted by: wii cable video | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:57 AM