Come on, you know it's coming. How long before Meghan McCain inks a deal to add body, though not necessarily substance, to the latest celebrity on the slide to nowhere playground of cable or broadcast TV? You have to admire a self-centric young twist who can manage to put down "flat-chested" women for not being as "sexual" as she's allegedly seen to be, then going on to bemoan a double standard when it comes to men without a blink.
Yes, Meghan McCain wants so badly to be taken seriously in politics, she felt it was time to start tweeting her tweats. Does that take one account, or two? Or perhaps more in the oh so sexual Meghan McCain's unfortunate case? Are you noticing how she usually makes news when she's playing the victim of someone, or something? What an inspirational young woman this is.
I suppose there are several ways to look at her issues, though I'd just as soon pass on her temporary tweat-icon. I didn't find it embarrassing, or sexual myself. If it reminded me of anything, it was Anna Nicole Smith at her worst, someone I always found more tragic, than sexual, to be blunt.
You see, all this time Meghan has been showing everyone everything, in her words, what she's "doing every minute of every day". (yawn) But no one seemed to be paying much attention to young Meghan. Ah, but now that she's shown us her tweats... Meghan's world is apparently, well, ... just okay - after all, she is yet once again just a viktum. Should we be surprised at this point? Really? And how special, ... how sexual, is all this? Thank God for her sake she isn't a B cup. She might not have even gotten her full fifteen minutes squeezed into that little thing.
On Wednesday, I posted a hastily taken self-portrait on Twitter—which I thought was funny and silly—and within a few hours I had caused a minor media scandal. I spent most of the next day thinking about what exactly was so shocking about the picture, why there was such an immediate and nasty overreaction. After all, it’s not like I was caught making a sex tape. I certainly didn’t pose nude for Playboy. And I hadn’t even exposed a nipple.
For years I have struggled to accept the fact that the way I look in a tank top comes off more “sexual” than a flat-chested woman. And once again I was reassured by the media that someone with my cup size should always be covered up. Or what, I’ll be seen as a slut? It’s pathetic we can come so far in so many ways, but when Rep. Aaron Schock or Rep. Jeff Flake post pictures of themselves without their suits on—and their shirts, for that matter—they are proclaimed “hotties.” But put me in a tank top and I am suddenly an embarrassment to the Republican Party and women everywhere. The double standard is infuriating.
As those of you who follow me on Twitter know, I live my life very openly. I will happily tell you what I'm doing every minute of every day. I will tell you what songs I'm listening to, what movies I've seen, and what books I've read. (That’s Arthur Danto’s new biography of Andy Warhol in the photo, by the way.) I love reading other people's Tweets to me.
Good to see Dan finally found some boobs on the internet.
You forgot to include "Developing..." at the end of the piece, though. I'm sure there's another four or five paragraphs full of misogynistic swill you can work in. Keep at it, Dan. We've got faith in you. Boobs always top the headlines at FOX News.
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 01:17 PM
"Good to see Dan finally found some boobs on the internet."
Not at all. You, Proud Racist, Roberta, et. al. have been around for quite some time.
Posted by: Darth Venomous | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 03:23 PM
This is the classic bait and switch...
Fat chick takes a picture from the chest up...fools everyone that her 38D's are hot...
she leaves off the fact that her full measurements are 38-48-68!
Posted by: JustOneMan | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 03:37 PM
"I will tell you what songs I'm listening to, what movies I've seen, and what books I've read"
Does she really think that her life is that interesting? When she is on TV I find her to be a dullard and dim wit!
Whats next? Will she share pictures of her bowel movements!
Hmmmmmmm now that might be interesting compared to the other crap she twitters about!
Posted by: JustOneMan | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 03:44 PM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/13/BAL81A4SU0.DTL
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 03:55 PM
"were too liberal, were raising their children wrong and because they hadn't invited him over for Christmas"
A solide defense of Justifiable Homicide
Posted by: JustOneMan | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 03:58 PM
It makes me think of the song by Chingy,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot5cBAupFBM
"Damn Girl how'd you get all that in them jeans??"
"you musta bounced up and down just to put em on"
"you musta laid on the bed just to zip em up"
That girl needs a pearl necklace!!
What a ho!!!
Posted by: SacTownMan | Friday, October 16, 2009 at 04:35 PM
For a supposed conservative political blogger, she doesn't seem to be following current events. Hasn't she noticed that for some time pop culture has advanced their promotion of sexualizing children? Does "rape-rape," Polanski, fired 110lb models, altered photos of models with heads larger than pelvis, Toddlers & Tiaras, girls tee-shirts with tassels for sale, Miley Cirus holding a stripper pole, ad nauseam, ring a well read brain cell, Meghan? Flat-chested females are more "sexual" to the media. Budding "slut" potential has a longer sale date. Here is some background for your celebrity couch chatter:
http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2009/10/08/the-polanski-culture-hollywoods-push-to-normalize-sex-with-children/
Meghan, it is not your cup size or wearing a tank top that defines you or any other woman, or attracts the media. It seems you learned well from your TMZ notified dinner with Tila Tequila, and what all the girls clinging to irresponsible Spring Breaks past on VH1, MTV, E!, etc. do with their enhanced breasts for attention; the promise of exposure, a nipple or a flash. So the next time you lie down in bed with a camera offering to live your life "very openly," think about the double standard you want to occupy.
No wonder you balk at Sarah Palin. Why rebel against one mother when adding Palin to your pathos will get you a book deal. A twenty-five year old with a an art history major, loving parents and trust fund money, should offer more to the world than celebutard clique competition. Act your age, Meghan.
Posted by: Fe | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 01:52 PM
If Megan McCain was trying to get more Twitter followers, this is one effective way to do it
Posted by: Sam Kaufman | Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 04:23 PM