« Campaign Checklist For Social Media | Main | Pepsi Attacked For Allegedly Stereotyping Women »

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20120a5e5fe17970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Left's Dual Diagnosis: BCDS:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Still, it wasn't good practice on Malkin's part to publish the false info about the childrens' book author. She has not, as far as I can tell, apologized to the author.

Olberman is a racist,misoginyst bigot and a wierdo. Shorter; typical demonrat

"Still, it wasn't good practice on Malkin's part to publish the false info about the childrens' book author."

What false information?

Abe,

Where's your evidence for this? Put up or shut up.

Rick Sanchez writes like he drives-hit and run.

Questioning political authority and "speaking truth to power" is only acceptable when liberals do it, and they don't need to apologize or be held personally and individually responsible for their actions or words. When conservatives do the same, they are ignorant racists, hate-mongers, etc. This drill is getting really old now. If people aren't buying what you're selling, it might be that your product is faulty, impractical or inferior; your salesman is clueless or untrustworthy; and/or that your sales pitch is not compelling. The left needs to stop the sanctimony about people who disagree with them being too ignorant to understand, too absorbed with hatred, etc. If their ideas were so great, they would have been wholeheartedly embraced by mainstream America long ago.


Their ideas have been embraced – see the results of the 2006 & 2208 elections. I would add that only around 20 % of voters identify as Republican. That speaks volumes about “brand”.

Only 20%, huh?

Not too far off from when the late, great Ronald Reagan ramped up his then seemingly unlikely campaign against none other than Jimmy Carter.

Seek

Mathematically that’s correct, but the times are different. Carter got elected because of Watergate and a desire of the country to move away from the GOP controversy. He was seen, not incorrectly, as ineffectual and that is, I believe, the primary reason he lost in 1980. You may not agree with my opinion that the Bush years were a disaster. Fair enough. What I don’t see happening, yet, is the level of dislike outside of the hard Right for the Obama and the Dems. There’s so much bad news and uncertainty about, that if, as I posted before, he / they end up improving the economic viability of a majority of Americans, movement Conservatism will not recover soon.

"I would add that only around 20 % of voters identify as Republican. That speaks volumes about “brand”. "

I don't think that during the Bush years the MSM were able to do some serious damage to the Republican party. But that said, how many people consider themselves conservative rather than liberal?

"What I don’t see happening, yet, is the level of dislike outside of the hard Right for the Obama and the Dems. There’s so much bad news and uncertainty about, that if, as I posted before, he / they end up improving the economic viability of a majority of Americans, movement Conservatism will not recover soon."

I see the cracks all over the place, even among people who work for the NYT and live in Park Slope. Trust me, the cracks are starting to show. Do you really not get a sense of how unpopular Nancy Pelosi is, outside of the "hard right"?
As I've posted before, don't hold your breath waiting for Obamas economic policys to start kicking in.
I truly think that the problems that we currently have are bigger than him, add to that that he's a spendaholic and it's simply not helping.

I'm sorry, that first line should have read "I don't doubt"

I not a political scientist or a serious statistician, so I’m sure my opinions are clouded by my own up bringing and life’s experiences. That said, the current world situation ( two wars ) and the dire economic prospects command that the average American focus more than they have in the past on the cause of this mess. We can probably agree up to this point that there is heightened concern for our present situation.

Now is where we’ll start to drift. It used to be a political axiom that the American public voted with there pocket books. Now I’m not so sure.

Here’s want I don’t get about the conservative opinion on health care. I see significant opposition to health care reform ( it’s actually insurance reform ) in the rural areas of the country where there is a high percentage of uninsured people. Programs like Medicare enjoy very high support in those areas. The government run health care canard is false. The government will not provide the health care ( unlike say the VA, which is true government run health care ). The government will provide an insurance option that, market dynamics being what they are, will require the insurance companies to become more cost effective. How is this a bad thing? Now different arguments can be made on the how this will be paid, but these don’t argue for not doing it. Why does the rank and file right live poor but vote rich?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad