Should we really be surprised given comments by Robert Reiiiiiiche?
It's baaaaaaak! The death panel provision that Democrats first denied, then removed, is now back into the healthcare bill - the 1,900+ page monster unveiled by the dimmest bulb in the House Nancy Pelosi. So get ready for stupidity like this coming to a hospital near you:
And public funding for abortion? Of course. They're determined to kill us coming, or going when they can. It's the guv'nment and they're here to halp us!


Dan, there is really no way to save any money in the Democratic health care plan other than to deny care to older people and the terminally ill, and ration care. Only a complete moron would believe that you could actually save money by giving everyone as much health care as they desired. And it would take an idiot to believe that including 40 or 50 million new people on a government-run option would be done efficiently. There will be more fraud, more use by illegal aliens, and more use by younger people who are really not sick enough to see a doctor, but hey, it's free, so why not?
Posted by: templar knight | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 09:57 AM
I think when the Donks and RINOS, DIABLOS, etc., are finally dispatched we need to revoke pensions and bennies for past Congresspersons. If they complain, usher 'em off to sanitariums, euthenizing's to good for 'em.
Posted by: gary gulrud | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM
And Dan, I'm old enough to remember when the liberals were having a wet dream about universal health care in the old Soviet Union, and how great it was. It was one of the worst systems on the planet as it turned out, but all the liberal rags raved about it. And now, we have the useless Hollywierd idiots trotting down to Cuba and Venezuala to suck Castro and Chavez's dicks, and then come back here and tell us how great everything is in those too wonderful places. I'd vomit if it would help, but I'm pretty sure other action is more appropriate for these scum.
Posted by: templar knight | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 10:15 AM
Ein Reich, Ein Volk, und Tot für alles Untermenschen!
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:14 PM
One could almost laugh, (and be assured that the Most High God shall laugh at us in our misery - Psalm 2:4) seeing the horrible judgments that Almighty God is declaring against us, in His fierce anger at our willing rebellion and wicked sinfulness...
Depravity, adultery, murders, famine, civil wars and insurrections, these shall be our lot in days to come, for we did not repent before the Creator nor did we confess our sins, nor sought forgiveness for the same.
We have been given over, and given up to wicked, evil rulers, who shall slaughter us as sheep.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:23 PM
"We have been given over, and given up to wicked, evil rulers, who shall slaughter us as sheep."
Total, unadulterated BS. And an outright lie.
Seek, do you still believe the Earth's just 6,000 years old?
Posted by: WPE | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 12:56 PM
WPE:
I believe it to be about over 6,500 years, give or take a couple hundred years (allowing for a gap in the interpretation of the overlap in Abram/Abraham's lifetime with that of Sargon the Great, along with the length of the Hebrew captivity in Egypt).
And, I think Neanderthals were more advanced than we "modern" humans, bigger brains, more robust physically, and generally longer lived - who gradually died out as the human lifespan decreased exponentially. That, and the amount of human genetic variety was greatly bottlenecked when it was reduced to only three reproductive lines.
And it is possible that they hunted the surviving dinosaurs and other megafauna God preserved through the Ark, into extinction. Genetic Bottlenecks and hungry humans are not a pretty combination....
...and lastly, however humorous an image it makes... it is possible that larger, and possibly docile/tractable dinosaurs could have been put to labour or to livery (i.e. riding dinosaurs).
Oh, and read your Bible, if you have one: God typically judges nations that were once God-fearing but then allowed their own sin to consume themby taking His protective hand away.
Read Deuteronomy 28, the curses of Mt. Ebal (disobedience and sin) vs. the blessings of Mt. Gerizim (obedience and holiness)
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 02:33 PM
And if you can't abide the Old Testament, then the New Testament confirmation of it is in the Book of Romans, Chap. 1:18-32 ... which underscores the utter depravity of man, and his natural bent toward disobedience and evil, and the natural consequence of which is for God to give such people up and over to their sins.
God won't force you to obey Him... but there are consequences for not paying heed to His word, and eternal consequences for not believing it and trusting Him for salvation.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 02:36 PM
Well both aspects would offend the likes of Hippocrates, that's the point and he preceded
Christianity by some four hundred years or so.
Posted by: the bishop | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 03:32 PM
"it is possible that larger, and possibly docile/tractable dinosaurs could have been put to labour or to livery (i.e. riding dinosaurs)."
Just like in the Flintstones.
Anyone who believes the Earth is 6500 years old is delusional.
Posted by: WPE | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 03:56 PM
"Anyone who believes the Earth is 6500 years old is delusional."
While I dont believe that myself. I find that what is truly pathetic is that it seems to bother you sooooo much. How very sad.
Posted by: WAHOO WILLIE | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 05:21 PM
Yeah, it does bother me. Not so much the idea, Seek can believe whatever he wants, it's that if Seek's fundamentalist brethren could they'd expunge any hint of Evolution from all science books and indcotrinate all our kids to believe the Earth is 6500 years old, that man walked the Earth with the dinosaurs and evolution is a lie.
Posted by: WPE | Friday, October 30, 2009 at 09:26 PM
"Anyone who believes the Earth is 6500 years old is delusional."
And anyone who believes anything Obama says is delusional. Which delusion is more dangerous, Hmm?
Posted by: Philip McDaniel | Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 07:32 AM
So is this "delusional":
"I do think that, for example, the 1980 election was different," Obama told the editorial board of the Reno Gazette-Journal on Jan. 14. "I mean, I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America in a way that, you know, Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not."
"I think it's fair to say the Republicans were the party of ideas for a pretty long chunk of time there over the last 10, 15 years, in the sense that they were challenging conventional wisdom."
Posted by: WPE | Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 12:03 PM
But WPE, you and your fellow leftists say that Republicans never had any ideas and that anyone who says so is delusional.
Therefore, you must either admit that you lied or that your Obama is delusional.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 05:01 PM
There's plenty of Republicans that have good ideas. It's just the current crop of wing-nuts is pretty bereft. But search through everything they've written, there's probably a few good ideas.
Ever see that shrink, NDT? Cause your Obama Delusion Syndrome is getting worse.
Posted by: WPE | Saturday, October 31, 2009 at 08:39 PM