In the piece you link to and affirm in the Daily Beast, “The Right’s Lesser Press,” Conor Friedersdorf refuses to interview me as he continues to be my unofficial biographer. (I’m VERY reachable, Conor.) He writes opinion pieces on me purporting to be journalism. He doesn’t quote or cite me, he simply assumes and pushes the point of view he thinks I have and makes an argument based on these alleged positions. It’s sloppy and you, of all people, should know better.
No idea why he would allow Conor with one N Freepersdork to draw him in. He's gone from Right to post-Modernist to the Daily Beast in two months. That's someone embracing anything just to find a home. I don't think he even knows what he is at this point.
>I don't think he even knows what he is at this point.
Prostitute.
Posted by: smitty | Tuesday, October 06, 2009 at 08:42 PM
Dan,
I'm an activist out here on the West Coast. Nobody in the two counties I have contacts in (LA and SD) have heard of Conor. If he did such a good job in Orange County, if he is such a Conservative, surely someone must yhave known him.
Nope.
And the fact that he follows the Anti-semite Andrew Sullivan around shows how little he knows of us Conservatives.
He has yet to attack President Obama or keith Olbermannm, but is very comfortable attacking Breitbart and Levin.
To quote a post I wrote: He flunked flank and ran with Mucus. The question is, when will Conor start working for the Obama administration?
Posted by: JSF | Tuesday, October 06, 2009 at 10:29 PM
Breitbart is a lying cheating hack!
Posted by: Syntax | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 12:57 AM
I see syntax confused breibart with olbermannm and obumbo
Posted by: your mama | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 07:33 AM
Sure, Dan.
Conor's never drawn you in, right?
Posted by: Mike2Cents | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 11:55 AM
In all fairness here is Conor's response to Brietbart.
http://theamericanscene.com/2009/10/06/responding-to-andrew-breitbart
I think that this particular hobby horse of Conor's is wearing a bit thin (even for me), but in his response I think he answers Andrew quiet well.
Also his latest project is a very good, and interesting one to follow. Some actual journalism that gives insight into the breadth of views represented in the GOP today.
http://thegopspeaks.blogspot.com/
Posted by: Jamie Lockett | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 12:24 PM
Hey it's Conor's butt buddy Jamie back to defend his braindead friend!
Right on cue!
Posted by: SacTownMan | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 01:00 PM
And Dan's butt buddy SacTownMan to the rescue.
Maybe your common butt-buddyness can lead to a mutual appreciation?
Wouldn't that be sweet...
Posted by: Mike2Cents | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 01:18 PM
Its SacTownMan - bringing the full retard to threads.
Posted by: Jamie Lockett | Wednesday, October 07, 2009 at 01:34 PM