« 10,000 Americans Gather For Tea | Main | Don't Cry For Me: Arianna »

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20120a5adbd8c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Van Jones: Follow The Money:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

You're reaching here.

First, who cares how the word spread about his book? Why wouldn't he promote it to the membership rolls of the organizations he is involved with?

You also appear to have misunderstood him when he talks about prisons. He is talking about literal privately owned and operated prisons as opposed to public prisons. He is not making a facile analogy about factories or private companies behaving *like* prisons. He is talking about actual privately owned for-profit prisons.

U.S. corporations use prisoners

Id wager if you looked into this, you'd find more Democrat owned corporations using prisoners, than republicans.

"It will also make sure that the green economy includes pathways out of poverty for low-income people and people of color."


Have I ever told you how much I hate the term "people of color"? Everyone is "of color". Screw anyone who uses this phrase. If you want to talk about the poor, talk about the poor. Keep your racial problems to yourself and out of our government. The whole term is used to pit all races against white people, being that whites are the only ones who don’t qualify for that term. Are we colorless? Are we translucent? Are we incapable of being cheated, lied to? Screwed under the table? When it happens to us, they just say “white trash”. But everyone else is a “person of color”. Rubbish!

Van Jones said a mouthful about white polluters dumping pollution on people of color. What a crock. I grew up in Sayreville NJ. It’s not without its superfund sites and it’s a known cancer center. It also happens to have been mostly white for a long long time. Van Jones CHOSE to have this debate in terms of race, WHEN HE DIDN’T HAVE TO. He could have chosen to have it in terms of class and money, but he chose race. What does that say about Obama being “post racial”? HE’S NOT POST RACIAL. Period. He’s a race baiter who surrounds himself with race baiters, to his own detriment! He’s only in the process of being found out!

To anyone who paid attention, none of this should come as any sort of shock. Barry and Michelle jive with every word Van Jones ever uttered. Believe it because it’s a fact.

This Jones fellow is an absolute monster. He is, in fact, a self described Marxist. There are numerous vids of him on Youtube using language which is racist (which the Left would agree with, if Jones was white...and the target of his remarks had been black), and making a host of comments which are at the least, embarassing for the Obama administration, and at worst intolerable in a powerful govt official.

And the larger issue is the one concerning these 35 so-called czars. These are powerful people sitting at Obama's knee...apparently with taxpayer funding at their beck and call. Who are they? What's their history? What are their powers, and where's the accountability? Congress vets cabinet appointees. IMO the "czars" are nothing but a sneaky method of shifting power from the cabinets to these shadowy people under Obama's direct control...and hidden from public scrutiny.

I call for a congress to conduct a transparent public investigation of these people.

For us simple-minded types this appears to be nothing more than a "buying votes" campaign.....

Speaking of following the money and nonprofits, here is a primer that might be of interest to you interweb searchers (pdf-6 pgs):

http://www.givingusa.org/pdfs/SpecialBulletin2009FINAL.pdf
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009:
Act Appropriations Beneficial to the Nonprofit Sector and Key Resources
for Organizations to Approach and Access Funding Sources
Researched and written at the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University

Dan, your column is a daily read, and usually enlightening. I really want to understand ALL of this post, but some of it is so convoluted and confusingly written, that I'm having trouble understanding what you're trying to say re: The organizations Jones has created. Maybe a little more editing is in order?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad