Same vermin, different rock? Well, it's a new day, after all.
Before the election, My Pet Jawa found that very-professional style supposedly "grassroots" nasty hit job videos on Sarah Palin were being posted on YouTube.
He discovered that these were created by a Democrat-connected California ad agency named Winner & Associates.
Ethan Winner confessed to making the video, but claimed he hadn't had contact with David Axelrod for ten years, it was all just something he felt like spending thousands of dollars on himself. As a goof.
Double Hmm. What goes around comes around, I guess.
Bim Ayandele (reputation manager with Winner and Associates in Los Angeles)


The Dems want to keep Palin in the news. HuffPo has a special section devoted to her, regardless of whether she has said or done anything remotely newsworthy. Maddow, Olbermann, Letterman, et al always have a jibe for her. The reason ? Liberals know she is someone they can beat. You notice they never mention Huckabee, or Romney. I like Palin, but she can't win. She galvanizes the left like no one else. She can't appear on Meet the Press and not look like a dunce. If she can't handle Katie Couric or Charles Gibson, how is she going to handle Putin or Ahmedinejad ? And really, if she were not pretty, would we even know her name ? She'd be just another anonymous hockey mom. Run Palin and she'll be another Goldwater. Popular with the GOP regulars but not with anyone else.
Posted by: david r | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Thanks for the Concern, Troll.
Go pollute some other blog with your second-grade essays about Palin. The readers here know and appreciate that Sarah Palin is to Obama what Sarah Connor is to SkyNet.
Posted by: DanO | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 04:19 PM
Palin never fails to bring out the vermin....
Posted by: Ad rem | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 04:42 PM
Is this your blog, DanO ? If it is, I won't come back. I first learned of this blog following its excellent coverage of the Natalee Holloway story. If it is a Palin-at-all-costs blog, I'm out of here. I don't want to be even remotely responsible for the re-election of Barack Hussein Obama. And Ad rem, you can kiss my backside.
Posted by: david r | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 05:55 PM
There is an ad agency on that list of participants and it's very odd -- someone from Weiden & Kennedy. They've been the agency for Nike, among many other brands. Very admired in the ad world. Not sure why they'd be included.
Posted by: Irene | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 07:22 PM
"Liberals know she is someone they can beat"
If Liberals know they can beat Sarah Palin, why are Maddow, Olbermann, Letterman devoting all their attention and time to her?
What more could the gang throw at her without appearing the fools.
Posted by: syn | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 07:44 PM
It seems like just yesterday that a certain political figure caved into Vladimir Putin and Machmood Amadinijad, with a midnight call informing key allies in Eastern Europe that they are on their own.
What a blow it must have been for the leader of Poles, coming as it did on the anniversary of the Russian invasion of Poland.
How do you think Obama would hold up in an interview with Glen Beck, or a sit down with Glen Reynolds on PJTV? Wasn't it Obama campaign and the entire Democratic party's policy to avoid Fox News altogether?
That's a policy Obama carries on to this day.
He doesn't want to answer any questions from someone more stiff boned the George Stefanopolis.
The irony is Fox and the Instapundit wouldn't use cut and paste editing to make Obama look the crooked fool. They wouldn't need amy cheap tricks like Couric and Gibson used on Sarah.
I think Sarah Palin on Meet The Press, sitting at a round table with more then one witness to give post broadcast testimony about editorial chicanery, is a crackerjack idea.
Even better would be an hour with Charlie Rose.
Posted by: James | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 07:51 PM
I'm old enough to remember when Jimmeh Cahtuh practically salivated at the prospect of running against Reagan. After all, hadn't the MSM proven what a moron he was?
david r, I don't *know* that you're a concern troll, and I'm not necessarily a Palin supporter, but nothing in the past 50 years or so convinces me that Democrats are smart enough to fool everyone by being so harsh on Palin when they're really not afraid of her.
I, personally, suspect that Huckabee would be the easiest to beat, but we won't know until 2012. Until then, denigrating *any* potential Republican candidate is puerile, *unless* you're trolling. You might think about that.
Posted by: JorgXMckie | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 09:14 PM
Actually she was on Charlie Rose, a year before she was picked, along Janet Napolitano, the one who believes in "man caused disasters" and the 9/11 hijackers came from Canada, our DHS chief
which scapegoats vets and Christians more often
than terrorists, on her memos. Palin described
Obama to a tee, showed how all his community organizing was junk, predicted how his efforts
would founder out of inexperience
Posted by: the bishop | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 10:34 PM
Just imagine she looks like Janet Reno. . . I rest my case.
Posted by: david r | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 11:24 PM
Barack Obama is failing so badly at running this country and some dirtbag wants to come on here and complain that Palin could not run the country? Give me an F'ing break! My five year old with disabilities could run the country better than this obama clown.
Pretty sad when you have to use manipulation techniques to trick the country into imagining you might be a good leader with good ideas. Obama is such an epic fail that it literally turns my stomach each time I see him failing again and again. Barack obama is the downfall for the democrats and a stain on our history as a country. I just hope we make it through the next three years with a shred of our liberty and our constitution left. So far, it is not looking good.
Posted by: political jules | Monday, September 21, 2009 at 11:47 PM
Just imagine Barry looks like Leon Spinks...
... or Rev Jackson.
Back atcha.
Posted by: James | Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 04:45 AM
Since yesterday at this time an additional 15,000 people signed up in Sarah Palin's facebook; I venture to estimate she will reach a million within the next month and she has never been on Oprah.
Palin is doing to internet what Reagan did to radio, building a solid grassroots movement slowly, surely and with conviction.
A remarkable feat for 'just another anonymous hockey mom'
Posted by: syn | Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 07:10 AM
**David - you make the assertion that Palin must lose against Obama. Make your case.
Anyone can make the exact opposite case based on your facts. HuffPo and the Liberal media keep Palin in the news, because they know, she's the only one who can smackdown Obama. All the DSM comments about Palin are negative. If they wanted Palin to lead the GOP, because she was doomed to lose, why wouldn't they build her up, like they built up McCain over a period of many years? If they damage here too much, she won't be able to win the nomination.
Posted by: Jabba the Tutt | Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 08:28 AM
Jabba, how about this ?
http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/fav-palin.php
Posted by: david r | Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 09:45 AM
david
I have a bet going that Rachel Maddow is the fruit of an unholy union between Janet Reno and her as yet unnamed lesbian life partner.
Any thoughts? Could you give me a clue as to where I might seek confirmation?
Forgive my asking but you seem tapped in to that segment of society, and among my acquaintences there really isn't anywhere to turn.
Posted by: James | Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 09:39 PM
james
The resemblance is striking. Don't know how to confirm it. Maybe follow Keith Olbermann on one of his drinking binges.
Posted by: david r | Wednesday, September 23, 2009 at 08:34 AM
"She can't appear on Meet the Press and not look like a dunce"
Don't be so sure. Meet the Press interviews generally aren't edited anywhere near as heavily as the Couric/Gibson interviews were; it would be much more difficult to make her look stupid, and I assume she learned to make her own copy of the video. She did pretty well in the debates, albeit against Joe Biden.
Posted by: J | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 12:27 AM
**james
"Just imagine Barry looks like Leon Spinks...
... or Rev Jackson."
...or Don King? ;)
Posted by: John V. | Thursday, September 24, 2009 at 01:49 AM