I want to post this to supporters of Sarah Palin. They might disagree, but it needs to be said. One must understand how the opposition fights.
I realize there is something of a storm being brewed around a Star item and also Jesse "the pervert" Griffin's sources. I also believe I now have enough evidence to take that issue up head on. I'm still working on some things, but I could easily address it now. ANd I'll not sink to debating the Star. Geesh! Suddenly it's a political rag? Oh, I get it, the spaceships on the WH lawn, they're true, too, right?
So, why not address the sourcing story?
Because the Left and especially Griffin want you to have that fight with them right now. He would like nothing better, as a matter of fact. Yesterday it was revealed that his listed current employer doesn't jibe with what seems to be the reality on the ground. And as you likely know, the story is actually much bigger than that.
How long would it take for you to respond if someone posted about you what I posted about Griffin yesterday? Has he called me a liar, pointed out where the story is wrong? No, not a peep. And while he may claim to be unaware of it, we know damned well that isn't the case. The loony lefty readers of those sites have been all over it here.
Given that he seems to have no answers so far, what does he have left? To change the subject, that's what. I refuse to play their game. Answer the questions, creep. That's all I have to say to, or about him today. Why hasn't he done it? All I can imagine is, he can't.
Tomorrow we'll get to his lies about sources. But, for now, let him hang. If someone calls you a complete fraud with plenty of evidence to back up the claim and all you can do is chirp like a cricket during a heavy rain, well, I guess that makes you a fraud. Why anyone would believe he would be truthful about his sources, or anything else at this point, makes no sense.
From what I can tell, yesterday he was basically proven to be lying through his teeth. And he hasn't said boo about it. Maybe there just isn't a lie big enough for Jesse Griffin this time out? Hey, just asking questions, you know?


Way to go, Dan. It's finally happening. The sheep are no longer content to be led to the shearing. The uprising against Obamacare and the fight against the Palin smears gives me hope that we will take our country back again!
I wrote on my website months ago that we need to fight back. The liberals own the board, it's their rules now. We're smarter than them. We can beat them at their own game and take it back!
Those on our side who may be concerned about us getting too deep into the mud need not worry. Once we win it back, the board is ours and we give it back to them, shining city on a hill and all.
Posted by: ReaganTMan | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:02 PM
Thanks Dan.
Posted by: Lar | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:15 PM
I think Griffy is busy with his stiffy.....
Posted by: Ad rem | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:31 PM
If I were Griffin and I were legit, I would be commenting here, there and everywhere and standing my ground in a detailed post on my blog. And probably sending personal emails.
I thank you for what you are doing. I believe people should be aware that Sarah has more supporters here in Alaska than detractors, it just so happens that a lot of the detractors here are in the media/or write for the Anchorage Daily News (we have one, ONE, newspaper here!) and other small publications or are one of the myriad liberal/progressive bloggers that have attained a modicum of media following. Not to mention the lovely (sarc) state representatives we have, cutthroating her all the way. I guess what I'm trying to say is, if you poll people up and down the streets, I think you would find more are in favor of Sarah than not. However, most don't blog, or read blogs. They cancel their newspaper subscriptions, watch Fox news and support in their own homes amongst their own friends and family.
I hope you continue with this story. Knocking this pustule out will make a dent. And maybe encourage other moderate/right almost bloggers who are teetering on the blog edge to jump in.
Posted by: anginak | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:31 PM
Dan, thank you so much for taking out the trash. These crapweasels need to be hammered back into the stone age. It is a worthy endeavor you're embarked upon. Too long we've let them get away with spewing their sewage. As many tree-huggers there are on the left, you'd think they'd object to all the pollution.
Posted by: Jack Okie | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:40 PM
Look we know the Star got one thing right, last time,(Levi and Bristol were breaking up) and everything else wrong, they relied on Mercedes,
Levi's sis, for most of the crazier facts, it's like chaff that one releases to block flak, misdirection, specially now that Sarah has made
an impact on the health care debate.
Posted by: narciso | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 06:43 PM
Who the fuck are you and do you think you're so special that Jesse Griffin needs to respond to you in any way whatsoever.
You're a disgusting creep with obviously way too much time on your hands.
I can't wait for Griffin to sue your ass, it will your just reward.
Creep.
Posted by: Mrs. Dorothy Asset Allocation | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 07:21 PM
Dan the man says, "Yesterday it was revealed that his listed current employer doesn't jibe with what seems to be the reality on the ground."
his "listed current employer"?? listed where Dan? Where is this list? what is your source for that? YOU DON'T HAVE A CLUE as to when that bit of information was made public now do you? You have zero evidence that is is CURRENT information do you Dan. Admit it. If you did you would have answered my many requests for you show us what your source was.
More from Dan, "From what I can tell, yesterday he was basically proven to be lying through his teeth."
Really? about what? I didn't see anything in that meandering, almost unreadable, post of yours that even slightly suggested that he lied.
And finally Dan said, "And he hasn't said boo about it."
Why should he answer your ridiculous questions? With all due respect Dan, who the fuck are you? You are someone that has shown that you are just out to destroy him and are willing to hurt anyone that gets in your way, like his totally innocent step son who you named and revealed his supposed arrests. Why would you do that? Oh, right, it's war right Dan? And you expect this guy to give you the time of day? You are truly delusional.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 07:35 PM
i for one would never ever respond to someone who has nothing better to do than build a cannon to shoot flies.
Posted by: White and Black Mixed | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 07:52 PM
HMMMMM....Proud Liberal...I often went to Jesse's IM site and I never once saw you there raising the same questions like why would Jesse want to distory Gov. Palin and her family? Never saw you questioning Jesse as to where he got his information? Looks to be like you are one of the Libs that like to defend each other but can't take it when it is dished out to you.
Dream on if you think Dan can't defend his information.
He probably is baiting Jesse....and your types. He would never risk his reputation on the likes of you two.
Posted by: Badeye | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Dan can't defend his information. If he could he would.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:01 PM
Watch them screeh, folks. Best entertainment in the blogiverse when they've been nailed. Poor Mrs. Dorothy, looks like she wrinkled up without ever having been "nailed" proper. Maybe she's too old for Jessikins? Just asking questions ....
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:04 PM
"Dan can't defend his information. If he could he would."
None of your fellow pieces of garbage have ever been able to back up their lies and accusations about Sarah Palin and her family.
Honestly, what's it like to be human filth? You know. . .like people such as yourself and Jesse "I Do Believe Those Are Obama's Balls I'm Sniffin'" Griffin?
Posted by: The Gonz | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:07 PM
Wow. On your Super Dooper Radio Spot, you claimed that you were not alleging that anyone had engaged in illegal or even unethical behavior... but you've been calling Mr. Griffen a pedophile for two weeks.
Cognitive dissonance, much?
Posted by: ossip81 | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:16 PM
"Just asking questions" does have a nice ring to it I must admit Dan. Perhaps you should change the name of your blog to "just asking questions" as you certainly don't seem to have any answers.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:17 PM
There is a BIG difference between calling and implying. Please point to the quote where Dan calls Jesse a pedophile.
If you can't then have a nice hot mug of STFU.
Posted by: Dr. K | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:33 PM
Dan has gone out of his way to say he is NOT calling Griffin a pedophile. You liberals know what Rosie O'Donnell always say, "liars get cancer." You guys should be very, very careful.
Posted by: w3bgrrl | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:36 PM
Sssssssssshhh.....that sound you hear.....it's MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON-bats! I like how they get all hissy and nasty-in-your-face like. And, the women. Well, "technically" the women. Mouths like the inside of garbage trucks! Nobody's born like that. These folks have done some hard living.
Posted by: Ad rem | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:40 PM
Hey Dorothy... You and your little dog, too. ; ]
Gawd this is funny. Over the target, Dan, and doing the work Americans just. won't. do. Heh! And you're legal.
Hmmmm... for a guy who doesn't "seem to have any answers" you've got these clowns damned jittery. Huh.
Posted by: Troll Hunter | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 08:47 PM
I think its funny. All these liberal (mostly) female trolls in these comment sections. They're just sooo angry. I imagine them balling up their little fists, stamping their little feet and screaming waaaaaaaaah! Comedy GOLD! I especially like the bimbo posting as "sarah" yesterday. GOLD I tell ya!
Posted by: phil latio | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:03 PM
What;s this I hear.....ROSIE AND KELLI ARE SPLITTING UP!!!
Posted by: Ad rem | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:03 PM
Loud Liberal is getting desperate. Little babies don't like being ignored.
Posted by: Lala | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:18 PM
oh, lala why don't you just in a lake. Lake Lucille. Perhaps you'll be lucky enough to find Sarah's wedding ring.
http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2009/08/ring-of-power-lies-beneath-tranquil.html
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:36 PM
So Dan is waiting for Jesse to confirm his story about him? You can't make this up.
Posted by: Pyous | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:44 PM
"Poor Mrs. Dorothy, looks like she wrinkled up without ever having been "nailed" proper. Maybe she's too old for Jessikins?"
Wow, Dan. Classy AND clever. Damn, I'm gonna have to nominate you for the Weblog Awards. This stuff is pure gold. But if the Weblogs aren't interested, is there perhaps a slightly skankier venue that might be more appropriate to your, er, level of commentary? You know, an award that captured the spirit of "The Most Heinous Celebrity Butt Crack Shots," except specific to unhinged political blogs.
Seriously, Dan, you used to seem like a narrow minded but at least occasionally decent person. Now it's like you've been high on crank for a couple of weeks and now you're up on the roof with a shotgun going "Yeee-HAWWWW!" Do your friends need to arrange an intervention? It's kind of sad, in a way, to see you trashing what's left of your reputation with this pointless, shoddily-put-together story. Under the circumstances, maybe you shouldn't be trying to draw so much attention to yourself. Is there an internet equivalent of those yellow sheets they use to cover up remains at grisly accident sites? I think one is needed here.
Posted by: Bob | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:51 PM
"How long would it take for you to respond if someone posted about you what I posted about Griffin yesterday? Has he called me a liar, pointed out where the story is wrong?"
WOW. Dan Riehl is one intrepid and persistent blogger troll if there was one.
Some just need all the attention all the while, just like Sarah.
Dan, consider yourself ignored and just move on, i.e., if you can.
Posted by: Melissa | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 09:53 PM
I kinda have the sense that Dan knows he has struck a dry well but he can't back down. Rather sad to watch.
Bob I haven't been around long, was there ever a time that Dan was actually a semi-reasonable blogger? I've seen no evidence of that but I'll take your word for it.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:00 PM
He's ignoring you Loud Liberal. hahaha
Posted by: Lala | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:01 PM
Bob,
I bet you typed that whole thing with your little "pinky" finger up.
Posted by: Ad rem | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:02 PM
you know that the jihad against Griffin is a complete when the wingnuts on here can't even muster the energy to get worked up about it. I think even they now realize that they have been sold a bill of goods that didn't quite pan out. It's ok Dan, you win some, you lose some. Griffin 1, Reihl 0.
I suggest you just move on and post about Obama being a sociopath again - you do THAT so well.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM
"He's ignoring you Loud Liberal. hahaha" --Lala
No, it more like Gryphen ignored Dan Riehl, and he couldn't take it, and just showed his hypocrisy by attacking Gryphen for exactly that.
Posted by: Pyous | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:07 PM
Dan is busy. Researching pussy photos judging from his last post. Forensic blogging ain't easy you know.
Posted by: Proud Liberal | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:10 PM
"consider yourself ignored" after you respond to him by posting?
that's good. you use the term troll incorrectly though...
if you are the admin of the site, you really can't be a troll.
my favorite line of the night, though...
"I can't wait for Griffin to sue your ass, it will your just reward."
so what are his damages? has jesse lost work because of dan? has jesse been unable to find work because of dan?
has his reputation suffered because of dan?
here's dose of reality. jesse is a pos. it is not dan's fault. if jesse could find a lawyer who would take up the case, a judge to let it past summary judgment, all that would happen is that jesse would open himself up to discovery. what are his chances of getting thru it without lying? dan could stop independent research and go to the source.
an irony is that the palin's wouldn't sue jesse because they would also be subject to discovery. if jesse opened himself up to a third party proxy, ie dan, there is zero doubt in my mind that dan's legal defense would be funded by those sympathetic to palin. it would be 'their' chance to crucify jesse.
Posted by: mark l. | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:11 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V30tyaXv6EI
conan, what is best in life?
conan: to crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women.
wow, dorothy, mary, melissa...that's some mighty fine "lamentations". do you girls do funerals?
Posted by: mark l. | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:19 PM
"you use the term troll incorrectly though...
if you are the admin of the site, you really can't be a troll."
The term usage is correct. I didn't say he is being a troll in his own comment threads. His persistent attempts to get a reaction from Gryphen with his blog entries is a classic troll behavior. "Trolls" can be in all walks of life. You can be a media troll, you can be a bloggger troll and you can a be a plain and simple troll in comment threads, like yourself.
Posted by: Melissa | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:27 PM
"Bob I haven't been around long, was there ever a time that Dan was actually a semi-reasonable blogger? I've seen no evidence of that but I'll take your word for it."
I'm not exactly an old-timer here myself. I have been pleasantly surprised to see a few of what seemed like calls for sanity to his wing nut brethren, and a few of what seemed to be moments of genuine humanity. But then he follows it up with these current hateful screeds and basically poops in his own mess kit. Who is the Riehl Dan Riehl? Who the hell knows? And really, at this point, who cares?
Posted by: Bob | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:29 PM
...Or your can look like a "troll", which I presume is your problem Melissa. ;-)
Posted by: Ad rem | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:32 PM
Sarah Cuda reminds me of the Battleship Washington, named for my state.
Japanese Navy learned the fine art of fighting at night and thus could avoid the aircraft we could send up from Henderson Field on Guadalcanal and from the Enterprise. Most of the ships on the bottom of Iron Bottom Sound are ours as we were taking the worse of these night actions. The Japs were sending a large flotilla of Marus to reinforce their garrison on Guadalcanal, probably enough troops and supplies to enable them to defeat our troops. We sent two battleships and four destroyers. The four destroyers were sunk or otherwise put out of action, their sailors swimming in the water. The Washington steamed past our sailors dropping off life rafts. The South Dakota followed. Washington's radar, a new fangled invention, detected a large contact up ahead, the battleship Kirishima. The Kirishima had big 15 inch guns, and had spent previous visits pounding Henderson field and our Marines. But the Washington did not know exactly where the South Dakota was, and therefore could not risk firing. The Kirishima knew that our detroyers were destroyed and when the South Dakota was lit up with flares commenced firing on the South Dakota. The Kirishima thought they had accounted for all of the American ships. It was midnight, no Moon, no electric lights on the islands.
The Kirishima did not know that the Washington was there.
As soon as the Washington knew where the South Dakota was, she fed in the firing solution for the radar contact ahead, her big 16 inchers lowered into position,
and delivered 45 big shells toward the Kirishima! At least nine of them hit.
The Kirishima became scrap iron and was scuttled later that morning.
The Marus' effort to deliver reinforcements and supplies to their garrison was thus broken up and we eventually prevailed on Guadalcanal.
With her Facebook shot with the phrase "Death Panels", Sarah Cuda is equally adept at delivering her big shells right on target and breaking up the enemy's attack!
Posted by: Roger Knight | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:37 PM
It amuses, in a year of 'investigative blogging'
what were you able to turn up on her,
Troopergate came up snake eyes, practically every ethics complaint has been dismissed, only the likes of Sullivan really follow the Trig
trutherism meme, Meanwhile, we must sadly report
that all our misgivings about the President, were sadly proven true, and she was one of those
who sensed what this 'brave new world' would be
like
Posted by: narciso | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:42 PM
"And really, at this point, who cares?"
hmmm...every lib that posts?
Posted by: mark l. | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:42 PM
"you can be a bloggger troll and you can a be a plain and simple troll in comment threads, like yourself"
that's "King" troll to you, deary. i'm not going to hide behind a facade of superiority, but i luv draggin turds like you under the bridge.
you are, thus far, a baby troll, but given time, I think you'll get bigger.
Posted by: mark l. | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 10:47 PM
Thanks, Dan. Have been following the evolution of the news story here. Keep pulling the threads.
Posted by: Sharon | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:09 PM
Keep going Dan, we love watching the exploding libs heads on your blog. And such a nice inclusive polite bunch, are'nt they? They are Griffin supporters ... sort of explains the derangement.
Posted by: Dantes | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:13 PM
Keep it up Dan; the amount of deranged anger directed at you for exposing a fraud (who can dish out the lies but runs like a little girl when you direct a few facts his way) is delicious.
Griffin went from laughing at you and declaring himself 'squeaky clean' to hiding under his bed in record time. The only people who would stand by this creep have to be just as miserable as he is.
Now his minions come here with weak taunts hoping against hope (now that their hero has been exposed as a truly curious piece of work) that somewhere, somehow someone will make this horrible episode go away so they get back to smearing Sarah Palin.
Posted by: harkin | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:14 PM
Proud Liberal = Snowing in Alaska?
Griffin flunkie, and consistent meme -> thugs everywhere, under every bed, low comprehension skills. And talk about paranoid.
Alaskan as well, maybe knows you are close Dan. He does protest too much.
Posted by: Dantes | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:20 PM
One question for all you liberals seeking answers about where Dan got his information. Put out a few hundred bucks and you to can find the information yourself. Pretty simple, unless you are a tight ass.
Posted by: cindi | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:24 PM
"I have been pleasantly surprised [blah blah] calls for sanity [blah blah] moments of genuine humanity."
What fvcking pretentious lies. Bob, you've been a consistent, condescending self-righteous piece of work since you first showed-up. Any other faux "disappointments" you'd care so share with us?
Someone around here blames the public schools. 'Thinking he's right.
Posted by: Troll Hunter | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:25 PM
oops. Question is, are you to freaking cheap to do your own search of very public records?
Posted by: cindi | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:26 PM
I blame the public schools...
Posted by: cindi | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:28 PM
While we wait ...
Some Lib Twit, Sarah i believe, ostensibly Dan's Concern Troll a few days ago, before she unmasked her Derangement, asked why we hate Obama.
Well for starters he is compulsive liar ... every time he opens his miserable mouth.
" .... USA Today corrects the record — in a sidebar — on a number of assertions made by Barack Obama yesterday at his Portsmouth, NH forum. They leave out the biggest whopper, which is Obama’s claim that he has never favored single-payer health-care systems, but they do catch a couple of other big fibs, including Obama’s snow job on AARP endorsement. One of the best catches from USA Today concerns Medicare Advantage, about which Obama has lied for over two years"
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/08/12/usa-today-fact-checks-obamas-town-hall-assertions/
Posted by: Dantes | Wednesday, August 12, 2009 at 11:28 PM