I have to share this story because the common slander the Lefty blogs hurls against the Right is somehow that we don't like "brown" people. Frankly, a rather offensive term they use there.
Anyway, I get lost in a DC suburb yesterday and need directions. I pull into a shopping mall and see this lady (white) walking to her car, I'm in mind. I'm inside the vehicle, so I power the passenger side window down and say, excuse me, I'm lost. Can you tell me how to get to so and so.
Well, she barely paused, looking at me with this almost disdainful look. As though I was ruining her day. "Well, you want to get to so and so the best way you can". ANd on she goes with really no help, or desire to help at all.
I whip around into a 7-11 and there's a "brown" fellow with terrible English due his accent at the register. And right behind me is this jet black fellow from, most likely, some part of Africa, with an even worse accent.
Point being, both guys knew just how I had to go but had different opinions and I could hardly make out a word either of them was saying. We must have spent five minutes, the three of us standing there. The "brown" guy behind the register gets to where he's laughing almost in tears at the black guy, who he can't understand either, but who is so determined to help me, he isn't stopping to take breath - pointing with his hands, I could make out, "You go there! You go there."
Eventually, the brown guy and I are both in tears laughing, neither of us able to understand the black guy, both interjecting directions over one another in a near frenzy by now. And I'm literally LMAO, because neither of us understood the others but were all determined to accomplish one goal - getting me to where I needed to be.
It took five minutes before I left, made two quick turns based on their mutual directions, ultimately, ending up back home in no time flat. I don't think I ever felt more grateful to two people for so sincerely wanting to do everything they could to help out a fellow traveler. Heck, I was the only American there in a DC suburb and the only one that was lost.
Great guys, both. Anyway, don't tell me I don't like brown or black people. I wouldn't trade those two guys in for that uptight upper-middle-class white woman who couldn't be bothered to give me the time of day for all the money in the world. People are just that, people. And I always take them as they come, regardless of skin color, country of origin, or native language, even if I just don't get how they talk.
Genuine communication can go much deeper than that, believe me.


"I pull into a shopping mall and see this lady (white) walking to her car,"
Would that be a "typical white" lady who thought you were "foreign"?
Or was it your existential conservative misogyny she understood immediately?
Posted by: Ran | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 07:55 AM
Ran,
You just don't get it. I've had my share of trying to talk with my hands and feet in various European countries. Encountering great people willing to help you out and send you off with a smile is a fantastic experience.
Posted by: expat | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 08:07 AM
Best video of directions EVAR - Larry Williams, Bam!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCXE9ZJb-RI
Posted by: BlogDog | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 08:49 AM
GPS
Posted by: smitty | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 09:08 AM
This skin color thing is getting out of hand. Notice how Lucia Whelan, the 911 caller in Gatesgate, had to protest that she wasn't white, God forbid, but olive-skinned. And what would have been wrong if she had described the two men as black? Nothing
Gate's whole dna scam that found out he is 57% white is another race hustle. Look in the mirror and that will tell you your origins without paying hundreds of dollars.
Posted by: Person of little or no color | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 09:49 AM
"Heck, I was the only American there in a DC suburb and the only one that was lost."
What makes you certain you were the only American?
My mom, a U.S. citizen for 40+ years, still has a pretty think brogue.
I'm just sayin'....
Posted by: Mike2Cents | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 10:05 AM
p.s. my nitpicking above aside, the gist of your post is a welcome break from all the noise..
Posted by: Mike2Cents | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 10:09 AM
That's a cute story, Dan, and just to be clear, nobody (at least not me) ever thought that you were personally a racist. One thing you left unclear, though, is whether the white lady was a Democrat or Republican. I suspect that she may well have been a Republican whose life was plunged into bitterness because of the Democrats' refusal to allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. That's a joke son, A JOKE!
Also, to be clear, if you were lost in my city, I'd make a sincere effort to give you directions. But then if you knew who I was you'd be so suspicious that you'd go in the opposite direction and end up down by the landfill where the seagulls and plastic bags and fruit flies swirl in the breeze, and you might contract a mild case of hepatitis. And then you'd blame the "liberal establishment" for your predicament. Again, just a JOKE, although it just happens to be a perfect parable for the current battle over healthcare reform. Sorry, I guess I can't help myself.
Posted by: Bob | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 12:00 PM
"My mom, a U.S. citizen for 40+ years, still has a pretty think brogue.
I'm just sayin'...."
i dated an au pair from denmark.
she was named "Rikke", but wanted me to call her "Ricky". Her reasoning was that she hated to hear her name 'butchered', and the larger concept of americans who tried to speak her language, but had hopeless accents, was ingratiating to her.
I love to hear pigeon english, the more broken, the better...
it is the source of great pride in this country that we accept the diversity of individuals, and everytime I hear our language get 'butchered', I think to myself, here is somebody who is trying to belong. it is beautiful, and provides a stark contrast to the 'parochial' nature of Europeans, who some would offer up as our 'betters'.
when in france, I don't even attempt their language, as the most common rxn is resentment. no wonder french is a dying language.
Posted by: mark l. | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 03:46 PM
The matter of being a decent person (or a jerk) knows no racial or ethnic boundaries.
Posted by: Mercian | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 04:23 PM
"Gate's whole dna scam that found out he is 57% white is another race hustle. Look in the mirror and that will tell you your origins without paying hundreds of dollars"
I'll disagree with that. I think DNA research isn't a scam but gives a better view of the past.
Posted by: Mercian | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 04:28 PM
Teen WASP boys mumble, often accomplishing this feat without a single flutter of their lips... just as difficult for me to decipher as pigeon English. And the one who's the most difficult for me to understand the most frequently is the one to whom I gave birth 16 years ago. Go figure.
Really enjoyed your story, Dan - it gave me a nice glowy, warm feeling (or, did Al Gore suddenly walk into the room?)
Posted by: ClassicFilm | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 05:26 PM
Hill billy d00dz,
It's pidgin not pigeon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pidgin
Posted by: STyken | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 05:45 PM
thanx fer de ejukatshun...
Posted by: mark l. | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 06:09 PM
Oh, wow. Didn't know you were still allowed to trade black dudes for white women. If they aren't American, anyhow.
ice9
Posted by: ice9 | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 06:38 PM
"...MUP DA DOO DIDDA PO MO GUB BIDDA BE DAT TUM MUHFUGEN BIX NOOD COF BIN DUB HO MUHFUGGA..."
Posted by: A. Wyatt Mann | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 06:47 PM
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Posted by: Cthulhu | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 06:55 PM
You were "literally" laughing your ass off. You laughed so hard it caused your ass to fall off. You now have no ass because "literally," it fell off.
If you can't be bothered to learn English, please go to Jamaica or Russia or somewhere.
Posted by: Arno | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Speaking of bad English:
"I whip around into a 7-11 and there's a "brown" fellow with terrible English due his accent at the register."
Why was his accent at the register?
Posted by: Bubba McHick | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 09:37 PM
"Heck, I was the only American there in a DC suburb and the only one that was lost."
I'm confused. Were you the only American because you were white or because English was your first language? Or are you assuming that the two direction givers aren't American because of their race?
Posted by: Bork Bork | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 10:15 PM
Great story, Dan.
Posted by: Grover Gardner | Tuesday, July 28, 2009 at 11:04 PM
Psst...people who feel the need to prove to strangers on the internet that they're not racist, probably have a guilty conscience.
Posted by: Wonk Hussein | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 12:18 AM
"Heck, I was the only American there in a DC suburb"
Really? The "coloureds" there weren't "real Americans"? Is that what this story was about?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 12:20 AM
Actually, the story was about liberals finding racism where none exists, Willem, but thank you for confirming that main point.
Meanwhile, I leave you with something deemed "not racist" by Barack Obama and global liberals everywhere, yourself included.
"White and Kinney both testified Kilpatrick used the F-word in describing them while urging his security detail to get them off the porch. They said the mayor also made racial remarks about her and White.
"You're a black woman,'' Kinney quoted the mayor as telling her. ``You should be ashamed of yourself being with a man with the last name white. You should not be a part of this."
White is white. Kinney and Kilpatrick are black. "He was very, very angry,'' Kinney told the court."
http://www.wwj.com/pages/2788316.php?
Remember, endorsed and supported by Barack Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZNvC_-RW2Q
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM
So, you followed directions given to you by people who weren't white. And that means you aren't a racist.
You might want to do a Colbert and get your photo taken with a "black friend" next.
Posted by: Rufus | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 10:55 AM
Yeah, because women have NO reason to not walk right up to a car and be helpful if a guy slowly idles up beside them asking for directions.
A friend of mine had a van slowly pull up to her and the driver ask her for directions once, tried to get her to come over closer. When she wouldn't, he pointed a gun at her head and told her to get into the van.
She ran like hell instead. Women are told to not pick up male hitchhikers for along those reasons, and women who hitchhike are told not to accept rides for males along those reasons, but hey, if we don't jump on over to give a ride or give directions to some dude we don't know in a car who doesn't want to bother stepping out of it, it's CERTAINLY because we're stuck up bints. Because we're all psychic, and should totally know when a guy isn't a threat, even if he's acting like a scenario we've been warned about.
Posted by: Ang | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 01:16 PM
Oh, puhlease Ang. In broad daylight right in front of a major store with me behind the wheel, powering down the window on the passenger side and she on the walk in front of the store. Yeah, I bet she felt threatened for her life at that. No, she was just rude. In fact, I wouldn't have done it were she on the driver's side of my car because I can understand how some might feel threatened. I'm actually always sensitive to that issue if I have to ask directions.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 01:25 PM
yup, because having a positive encounter with two POC (people of color) totally means you don't have any engrained ideas about they might be like in a different situation, or about their inherent worth as people.
one thing i think people do wrongly when discussing race is using "racism" as brush to paint a whole person. every one of us has problems in the way we deal with/view the rest of the world. you don't have to be a racist, i.e. cross-burning n-word using white supremacist, to have racist ideas or make racist assumptions. those of us on the progressive side of politics are trying to point out that, just because a person isn't a raving lunatic, doesn't mean that they're completely without prejudices. i'm including myself in this, as well. this discussion is needed to make people more aware of the prejudices they can't see because SO many people have them that we don't even notice it anymore. it's not about demanding that we all be perfect. it's about expecting us all to admit to our imperfections and try to correct them.
Posted by: InfamousQBert | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 01:36 PM
Oh, puhlease Ang.
and, while i'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here, i'll assume you've been a woman for an extended period of time and so know exactly what it's like to constantly live in fear that the random guy in the elevator sees your body as public property. or to know that, should something really horrible happen to you, there's an excellent chance you'll be blamed for wearing the wrong clothes, walking in the wrong part of town, or any other number of things that don't make you a person worthy of assault.
i'll never know what it's like to be a kind man who is looked at in fear due to other horrible men and their actions. so please don't assume you know what it's like to be a woman who can't read a man's mind and so has to protect herself by making a horrible assumption about every man she encounters. it sucks, but that's the world we live in, and dismissing our complaints is not a good way to change that.
Posted by: InfamousQBert | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 01:48 PM
html fail in my previous comment. i meant for the first line to be a quote from dan's comment above.
Posted by: InfamousQBert | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 01:57 PM
You're kidding, right?
You can't see the overt racism in this post and I'm supposed to believe you 'see people as people.' Now I'm LMAO.
Posted by: sue | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 02:31 PM
I don't know what "with me behind the wheel" is supposed to mean. You are... white? Therefore non-threatening. That can't be it, no! Because you just told me you didn't have racist tendencies. Could you clarify that sentence please?
Good thing that no one ever gets assaulted in public places during the day. Oh wait. That's not true either.
Definitely keep talking. You are proving the exact opposite of what you think you are proving. It's fascinating. And scary how unaware you are.
Posted by: sue | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 02:35 PM
I'm not a racist. I once asked directions from a brown fella and a jet black fella. At the same time. After a white woman didn't want to have anything to do with my advances.
Posted by: Patrick Bateman | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 02:37 PM
Did it occur to you that pulling up behind this woman may have freaked her out? You know, you being a man she doesn't know, in a parking lot (where rapes have been known to occur)? That maybe she was just trying to get away from you for that reason? Nope, better to just call her a bitch.
(I'm not even going to address the racial stuff.)
Posted by: Kristen from MA | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 02:56 PM
Definitely keep talking. You are proving the exact opposite of what you think you are proving. It's fascinating. And scary how unaware you are.
Sue, the hilarious part is that you attack Riehl while endorsing and supporting this kind of behavior.
"White and Kinney both testified Kilpatrick used the F-word in describing them while urging his security detail to get them off the porch. They said the mayor also made racial remarks about her and White.
"You're a black woman,'' Kinney quoted the mayor as telling her. ``You should be ashamed of yourself being with a man with the last name white. You should not be a part of this."
White is white. Kinney and Kilpatrick are black. "He was very, very angry,'' Kinney told the court."
http://www.wwj.com/pages/2788316.php?
Remember, endorsed and supported by Barack Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZNvC_-RW2Q
In short, Sue is yelling at Dan Riehl about what she thinks is his racist attitude while totally ignoring her own party and liberalism's endorsement of someone who says a black woman should be "ashamed" to investigate black criminals and to ride in a car with a white man.
But that's because people like Sue equate racism, not with behavior, but with political affiliation. That's why Robert Byrd, a KKK member, is not a racist, but Michael Steele, a black man, is.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:05 PM
Dear North Dallas Thirty,
You are incorrect. I am addressing a specific thing Dan said that is, in fact, racist. You are somehow illogically drawing a connection between something Dan said that I called out and something "my party" did or said.
Since I haven't actually commented on the White/Kinney situation you have no idea what I think of that. I merely pointed out that Dan tried to defend his not being racist by writing a racist post. Oh, the irony.
Thanks,
Sue
Posted by: sue | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:11 PM
Just want you to know, this is the single most disturbing blog post I have read in a year. I agree with sue, I cannot believe you are comfortable saying and thinking these things; that you celebrate this little episode, even, as "sticking it to those liberal commies" and PROVING you ain't no durn racist.
Some edumucation: Racism is a structural phenomenon, not a personal preference. The witchhunt for racism carried out by the Left and defended against so avidly by the Right is one big sham. As InfamousQBert points out, we all have issues with race. But what conservamatives consistently (and, it strikes me, sometimes intentionally) misunderstand, is that racism always involves power. 'Racism' is not equivalent to 'involving race in any way.' And conversely, 'not mentioning race' doesn't clear a comment or action from the charge of aiding racist power redistribution. THIS is why it is problematic from the point of view of race for, e.g., Cambridge police to arrest Gates in his own home, and not problematic in that way if he were white (but quite possibly problematic in others).
Racism is an objective fact of life for everybody--it's a mode of oppression, and you're either on the giving or the receiving side. Statements and actions either further or counter the power redistribution inherent in a racist society like ours. This blog post, for example, reinstalls hurtful myths about people of color.
http://tr.im/ybot
Posted by: E. Weiskott | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:18 PM
Kristen wrote:
Did it occur to you that pulling up behind this woman may have freaked her out? You know, you being a man she doesn't know, in a parking lot (where rapes have been known to occur)? That maybe she was just trying to get away from you for that reason? Nope, better to just call her a bitch.
It's kind of funny to get angry about dan assuming the woman is a bitch based on his assumptions of her actions, while then describing the woman's assumption of his actions. if she can view his simply drinving up next to her and politely asking for directions as a sign of him being a potential rapist, then surely Dan might at the same time view her snootiness as a sign that she's a bitch?
Posted by: jr565 | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:26 PM
Sue please describe the racism in detail so that we can determine that you are in fact correct in your assumption or simply playing making blanket charges of racism based on your own ideological prism, kind of like Gates did.
Be VERY precise.
Posted by: jr565 | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:27 PM
I love all these leftist trolls chiming in. I wonder how many actually bothered to read the post, and how many just decided to chime in because some idiot blogger said, "OMG - the DAN is the racist." For the love of humanity, think for yourselves for once you blind, blithering idiots.
Posted by: Paul Zummo | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:28 PM
You people are nucking futz. And by "you people," I meant liberals, not necessarily any one color, or race. But, if you're black and forgot to register at the door, please don't steal anything from the sidebar when you go.
Thanks!
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:29 PM
"You are incorrect. I am addressing a specific thing Dan said that is, in fact, racist. You are somehow illogically drawing a connection between something Dan said that I called out and something "my party" did or said."
Actually, Sue, what I am doing is demonstrating how the definition of "racist" to liberals like yourself oddly enough covers Dan's asking for directions, but does not include shaming and humiliating a black female police officer for daring to investigate criminal behavior by a black man and for the capital sin of riding in the car with a white man.
I would also like to point out how racists like yourself, Sue, use the accusation of racism to cover up criminal and thuggish behavior on your own parts.
"According to Barker's mother, Kelli, her son was taken to a hospital with cuts and with injuries to his eyes and ears after the assault. His right eye had blood clots, she said.
Parents of the Jena Six say they heard Barker was hurling racial epithets, but Barker's parents insist he did nothing to provoke the beating......
At the hearing, attorneys representing the five men read a statement expressing sympathy to the Barkers and acknowledging that Justin Barker did not use a racial slur."
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/26/louisiana.jena.6/
In short, liberals like yourself not only have a hypocritical definition of racism, you have shown yourself willing to lie and state that other people are racists to rationalize your hateful behavior towards them.
Like your friend Henry Gates and your Barack Obama.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:32 PM
"Some edumucation: Racism is a structural phenomenon, not a personal preference."
What a neat way of removing a person's actions from consideration and being able to blame their being part of a particular organization or group instead.
In other words, Riehl's actions mean nothing; I can accuse him of racism because he's a white male.
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:34 PM
Hey Zummo, you're right. LIEBERALS (ROTFL) need to think for themselves. We can't all be "dittoheads" gleefully repeating what some fat, drug-addicted gasbag says.
Posted by: Samy Joseph McBride Warner Guildenstern | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:40 PM
To be honest, as a young woman, it would disturb me to be accosted by a man in a vehicle while walking to my car alone in a parking lot. It doesn't excuse her rudeness, but enough women read enough chain letters about serial killers asking for directions, pretending to be disabled, etc., in order to lure women into their cars to be wary of anyone. Not to place any blame on you, but maybe in the future you'd get a better reception if you'd ask first in a gas station, etc., rather than asking a lone woman or a woman with children. Just a suggestion.
Posted by: Rose | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Ah, Dan, proving to me just what you are. You seem comfortable in your skin, so just live with the fact that you are YOU, man. You and North Dallas Thirty can just go off in a nice little corner together and talk about what great white dudez you are and how women and coloreds are just don't get it. Your very direct "just don't steal anything from the sidebar" pretty much sums it up with a nice red, white and blue bow, doesn't it?
And you have disdain for upper class women who just might not need to give you the time of day or directions. Awwwww. Poor Dan!
Posted by: DW | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 04:06 PM
"Acosted" Ah, I see. Well, we should stop allowing us men folk to drive through parking lots, I guess.
Like I said, nucking futz. LOL
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 04:25 PM
Dan attempted to post something that spoke to the fact that outside of punditry, blog ranting, university studies, polls, etc. - we all often get on quite well and repectfully here, in spite of ethnic differences, etc. He felt some positive affirmation from his encounter with a couple of other folks (and quite potentially, fellow US Citizens) and wanted to share that.
The slip here is when he assumes and writes he's the only American. It's a bad slip.
I don't think he was thinking too hard about that detail when he wrote it, and had he been more thoughtful and done a re-read before posting he might have caught and removed that line.
In the end though it's there and there's no explaining it away.
He thought to himself - and shared that thought with others - that heavily accented people of color are probably not Americans. It's not an intrinsically evil or racist assumption - but it's a wrong one. I think DR could do well to not get too defensive here and instead consider accepting in hindsight that this was a bad sentence. Should anyone ever assume that a heavily accented person of color is not American?
Everyone knows the right answer, including DR.
(Even ND30, despite the free association rants against all things Obama.)
Posted by: Mike2Cents | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 04:37 PM
But what conservamatives consistently (and, it strikes me, sometimes intentionally) misunderstand, is that racism always involves power. 'Racism' is not equivalent to 'involving race in any way.' And conversely, 'not mentioning race' doesn't clear a comment or action from the charge of aiding racist power redistribution. THIS is why it is problematic from the point of view of race for, e.g., Cambridge police to arrest Gates in his own home, and not problematic in that way if he were white (but quite possibly problematic in others).
babble babble babble.....
So I guess you are saying if a black officer were arresting a white professor it was racist. Remember Cambridge mayor is black, MA governor is black, US prez is black, seems like a pretty strong power base to me.
Posted by: Mercian | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 06:07 PM
“Anyway, don’t tell me I don’t like brown or black people. I wouldn’t trade those two guys in for that uptight upper-middle-class white woman who couldn’t be bothered to give me the time of day for all the money in the world.”
Trading brown people for money, which only strengthens Dan's point that he's not a racist.
I'm sure he has a lot of friends who are Jewish as well.
Posted by: Dhalgren | Wednesday, July 29, 2009 at 06:38 PM