The Left's Misogyny Spins Out Of Control

Aside from now being so overtly partisan, it's a shame to see Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight squander his credibility so hugely in displaying the Left's hate for Sarah Palin. Forget that he foolishly tries to marginalize her terrific fund raising display for an embattled Republican, the misogyny here is really over the top. One of the things I especially like about Palin is the way she causes the Left to lose their grip. You really should be better than this Nate. Leave the misogyny to Tbogg, or SadlyNo, if you want to be taken seriously as a numbers crunching site. Or, perhaps he was trolling for an Andrew Sullivan link?

Palin: All Tail, No Head

That is a very high percentage -- higher than for any of the '08 presidential candidates but for Ron Paul -- as you can see from this chart where I've colored Palin's total in Misogynist Pink.

If Palin weren't doing exceptionally well in this regard, MoveOn wouldn't be targeting her, as Susan Ducclose blogs:

Anyone that has been following the Sarah Palin show can tell you that the more liberals jump on the Palin Bashing Bandwagon, the more popular she seems to become with her base and it grows.

So, being blinded by this support she is receiving, much to do with the liberals constant harassment of her, what do liberals do?

They up the ante and decide to bash some more, therefore making her even more popular.

Comments

[tailhead]

Tail, head, I get it! Har har har. Reminds me of middle school.

Guess it's OK for libs to be insensitive, because we know deep down they're really not.

[Slide]

Victims... the right are always victims.

[Slide]

like I said, the right consistently portray themselves as victims. Hey, they even did this when they controlled the Presidency, the House, the Senate, the Supreme Court.... they were still the oppressed minority being unfairly attacked.... What incredible pansies. Oh, oh.... that was a homophobic attack now wasn't it? Damn.

[mark l.]

"Aside from now being so overtly partisan, it's a shame to see Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight squander his credibility so hugely in displaying the Left's hate for Sarah Palin."

nate blew his credibility when he was out there trying to certify the Iranian election, based on the numbers the Iranian regime was providing. Not a big fan of the site, but it was interesting watching other 'columnists' at the site trying to walk nate back from the abyss.

there were three ways to play the iranian election when it unfolded. cry "fraud", wait/consider, and see, or support the regime.

538 had two ways it could have gone after the election...a liberal leaning realclearpolitics, or just another wing in the propoganda ministry. (appeal to a broader base, or preach to its choir)

[Slide]

Two can play the victim card you know. For instance, today I could have said (if I had Riehl's sense of humor) that Sotomayer was the victim of racist insults from a GOP Senator for what happened during her hearing today:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/15/coburn-evokes-ricky-ricar_n_233555.html

"(AP) WASHINGTON -- Sen. Tom Coburn evoked a 1950s TV show Wednesday in a quip responding to Sonia Sotomayor's scenario about what he might do if she - hypothetically, of course - attacked him.

"You'll have a lot of 'splainin' to do," Coburn said, to laughter from the crowd and Sotomayor. What he said - and how he said it - was a riff on a Hispanic television character, Ricky Ricardo, whose accent is now widely considered a broad parody.

In the famous 1950s TV show "I Love Lucy," the Cuban bandleader Ricardo (played by the equally Cuban bandleader Desi Arnaz) would often admonish his scatterbrained wife, Lucy, by saying she'd have some "'splainin'" to do. The phrase, "Lucy, you have some 'splainin' to do," has since become part of the popular culture."
===========================================================================================================

I wonder if the SCOTUS candidate were African-American would Senator Coburn had put on black face and done a minstrel show? He should stick to assisting his fellow Republican Senators pay off their mistresses.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/07/10/2009-07-10_sen_john_ensign_enlisted_parents_to_help_pay_off_exmistress.html

[North Dallas Thirty]

The funny part is how Slide and his fellow liberals whine and cry about how "abused" they are at this website.

Again, the complete lack of principles, morals, and values applies; Slide freely insults and attacks others, but then insists that anything that even vaguely contradicts him is wrong.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Two can play the victim card you know."

But you said before that anyone who played the "victim card" was a "pussy" and unfit for any type of government position.

Notice again how the complete lack of principles, morals, and values applies.

[mark l.]

"Since you don't bother to acknowledge that tail and head might mean something different"

there is this thing called a "double entendre".

it is stating something which may have two(or more) acceptable meanings...

you excoriate dan for discussing one interpetation, but demand singular consideration for the other. how does that work?

[Slide]

I have whined and cried about being abused? lol. Don't think so bucky. I actually like being abused by you ND30. You're my favorite. Ran is a close second. Your constant attacks on me, bereft as they are of any wit or humor, let me know in no uncertain terms that I am getting to you. Damn I enjoy that. Almost as good as sex. Now if I can figure out a way to have sex WHILE annoying the shit out of you I would be in heaven.

[thegreatbeast]

One problem the Republican party has is that the MSM keep going to people like McCain and Graham as representatives of the Republican party. The fact is that they don't represent Republicanism as it is today, mid-July 2009 but the MSM want to freeze the perception of the party to that of last year. It would kill the MSM to acknowledge that it is a new time, a new day.

[seekeronos]

Unfortunately, people like Slide and Mantis (among so many other socialist minions who are drunk on the Obama Kool-Aid) cannot accept that the blogger at 538 just *might* have been attempting a try at double-entendre.

The point being, is just like the socialist pigs of Orwell's "Animal Farm"... for them, "four legs good, two legs better".

Indeed, injustice, chicanery, and rapidly changing "values" (ain't "moral relativism" grand?) also known as "hypocrisy" are finely honed weapons in the socialist revolutionary's arsenal.

And these ACORNista commies who post here ever defending their broken ideas which have brought many other nations to ruin are ever willing to swiftly move goalposts, shift their principles... anything for the cause of their revolution against individual rights and freedom.

Yet they too, shall be disposed of, or at best, put to labour as minor chattels of the "swine farmers" (oh no, there's that double-entendre again!) as soon as their usefulness is at an end.

[Philip McDaniel]

"Now if I can figure out a way to have sex WHILE annoying the shit out of you I would be in heaven. "

Just put your mouse in your other hand and do what comes natural to you...

[tailhead]

Uh sorry, mantis; so happens I have a Ph. D. in statistical physics. While it's common to talk about the "tail" of a distribution, there really is no such thing as its "head." That term must be referring to something else.

There is no double entendre in Nate Silver's headline. There's just one.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Your constant attacks on me, bereft as they are of any wit or humor, let me know in no uncertain terms that I am getting to you. Damn I enjoy that."

(shrug) Even mosquitoes need purpose in their lives, I suppose. And who am I to deny Slide the one chance he has to feel like he can actually do something?

[Slide]

when was it exactly when all right wingers lost their collective sense of humor? They are a sour little bunch aren't they?

[North Dallas Thirty]

"when was it exactly when all right wingers lost their collective sense of humor? They are a sour little bunch aren't they?"

Actually, I'm laughing right now at the contradiction between you whining about peoples' losing their sense of humor and your posting above screaming about how Sotomayer was being victimized.

[Dan Riehl]

Some intellectual dishonesty there, Slide. Or is that dissembling, or both? One minute it's an accurate reference. But when forced to retreat, oh, it was just a joke.

Pretty lame, dude. Just admit you were busted and move on.

[molonlabe28]

These people at HuffPo are perfectly unhinged.

They need to start dispensing some serious meds at that place.

They had better to get used to being distressed on a regular basis because Sarah isn't trapped up in Alaska anymore.

She will soon be speaking to packed venues at the same time that Obama's stock continues its downward trajectory at a considerably steeper pace (as the topics become tax increases and inflation).

[Slide]

Dan comments, "Some intellectual dishonesty there, Slide. Or is that dissembling, or both?"

Neither Dan, I was just pointing out how easy it is to do. If you want to find misogyny around every corner when it comes to Palin then I can find racism around every corner when it comes to Sotomayer. I was making fun fun at you Dan. Its rather easy. The fact that you didn't "get it" confirms my thesis that wingnuts have zero sense of humor. Come to think of it the Third Reich wasn't a belly full of laughs either. :-) See, that was humor. I'll put a little :-) from now on just to let you know when I'm having a little fun with ya'll.

[seekeronos]

"racism"

Last time I checked, "Latina" was an ethnicity, not a race.

[Darth Venomous]

"he fact that you didn't "get it" confirms my thesis that wingnuts have zero sense of humor."

Oh, of course we do, moronette. (Oh! Oh! MISOGYNY!!!!) We look at you and see a pathetic joke.

"Come to think of it the Third Reich wasn't a belly full of laughs either"

Ah, Slip'n Slide loses yet again. Godwin 1, Slipster 0. (chuckle)

[Batly]

Posted by: Slide
If you want to find misogyny around every corner when it comes to Palin then I can find racism around every corner when it comes to Sotomayer.

Technically Slide, Puerta Rican is not a race, so criticizing her is not racist. You are just ignoring the misogyny because no one, even a sex starved humorist like yourself could ever have sexual thoughts when looking at or listening to the Democratic A Team. That must be why Sotomayer was called "scary smart" today. I have heard that same compliment about Hillery Clinton. Ooooh, they are so smart that it doesn't matter that they are ugly in appearance and personality. Yeah right, listening to the wise Latina explain herself today, was scary in that you progressives could actually put this woman in a position to be deciding legal issues. Was there no other liberal who could have be provided? The same people that think she is a deep thinker are the ones complimenting Michelle Obama's arms. Those arms are the only thing on that woman that are not over sized and unattractive, including her personality. She is probably as scary smart as her husband. The same one who won't release any grades or transcripts.

[mark l.]

http://linkage.rockefeller.edu/wli/glossary/stat.html

statistics glossary.

I guess, mantis, that I should admit I was wrong.

I gave nate the benefit of the doubt, and accepted you at your word.
2 mistakes, I now correct.

[Slide]

Batly incorrectly said, "Technically Slide, Puerta Rican is not a race, so criticizing her is not racist."

When in fact:

"the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. '[3]

This definition does not make any difference between prosecutions based on ethnicity and race, in part because the distinction between the two remains debatable among anthropologists.[4] According to British law, racial group means "any group of people who are defined by reference to their race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origin""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

[Slide]

the cluelessness of ND30 is exemplified by this comment: "Actually, I'm laughing right now at the contradiction between you whining about peoples' losing their sense of humor and your posting above screaming about how Sotomayer was being victimized."

1) A declarative statement regarding the woeful lack of humor on our Neanderthal brethren on the right is hardly whining. Just an observation. Nothing to whine about. I could care less if you all work yourself up into a frothing lather while watching Obama and the Dems taking back our country.

2) I was not screaming about how Sotomayer was victimized. Just the opposite - but apparently your reading comprehension needs some assistance so let me explain it. Again. I was ridiculing Riehl for suggesting that Nate Silver was being misogynistic with Nate's harmless blog entry by offering an analogous situation of another harmless comment, this time directed at Sotomayer, which could be demagogued as being racist. Both examples are silly. That was my point. Now study up next time you comment and try to figure out what is being said before you reflexively spew your nonsense ok bucky?

[Rich K]

Geez. Just the mention of Palin draws them here like flies to a turd.Keep up the good work Dan. And remember; If you ever get lonely just type PALIN in any thread you post and you will be lonely no more.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"Again. I was ridiculing Riehl for suggesting that Nate Silver was being misogynistic with Nate's harmless blog entry by offering an analogous situation of another harmless comment, this time directed at Sotomayer, which could be demagogued as being racist"

LOL....and once caught in his hypocrisy, Slide dissembles, claiming he didn't really mean what he clearly wrote when he attacked Coburn for being racist and stated that Coburn would wear blackface when talking to a black Supreme Court candidate.

[Batly]

Thanks slide, so the "Wise Latina" comment was definitely a racist statement per the wiki definition. You have confirmed exactly what a plurality of Americans believe. Sonia Sotomayor is a racist, self described "affirmative action baby" whose judicial decisions are prejudiced because of her race. Therefore she is unqualified to be seated on the court.
Her Ricci decision ESPECIALLY contradicts your definition:"the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. '[3]
Scary smart? No just scary.

[Guayo]

I will say it again and again ...

Hillary did not lose to Obama; Palin did not lose to Biden.

The Media crowned two less competent men: one as President the other as Vice.
The same Media that is now covering up the ill conceived plans of the current Administration.

--on another matter---
WHERE IS THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE??
Just look at the question and tell me: Is that an unreasonable thing to ask?
I am not a Rightwing nut? I think this is a serious question at this time…this is because we are told we are not allowed to ask it and/or expect an answer. I thought this was the Land of the Free...I thought the Constitution was important.

HOW FAR GONE IS THE MEDIA?
You can't ask a basic question, but you can destroy Hillary or Palin? Is this supposed to be funny?

[Shawn]

Ugh. As a former Republican fundraiser let me explain something. In fundraising (across party lines FYI) you have your heads, your bodies and your tails. The heads are the large guys/gals (PAC's, maxers, etc). Body is usually your $50-60+ people (Internet, sustainers, etc). Tails are your little guys/gals (grandma's who literally send a $10 or $5 bill in an envelope).

This kind of post reminds me of the DC official who was almost fired for using the word 'niggardly' in a budget meeting (don't know it's meaning - look it up). As far as I can tell, this wasn't a sexist attack.

Before immediately jumping to conclusions you should ask yourself if you know what you're talking about. This kind of post continues the meme that the party, and its supporters are uneducated, at best, or disingenuous, at worst.

To repeat: these are fundraising terms.

[Slide]

Bizarro Wingnut World: "You have confirmed exactly what a plurality of Americans believe. Sonia Sotomayor is a racist, self described "affirmative action baby" whose judicial decisions are prejudiced because of her race. Therefore she is unqualified to be seated on the court."

Reality: "As the Senate Judiciary Committee today begins confirmation hearings on President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Sonia Sotomayor, a slight majority of the American people support her confirmation, according to the latest Gallup poll.

Since her nomination was announced in May, her public support has remained steady, with 53% supporting her nomination compared to 33% who oppose it. In May, 54% supported and 28% opposed.

Her numbers are in line with recent court nominees including Samuel Alito and John Roberts, who both enjoyed pre-hearing ratings of about 50%."

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/07/13/slight-majority-of-americans-support-sotomayor-poll-shows/

[Slide]

I think this is rather right on the mark and relevant to this thread:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124761930140242533.html

"Like Oliver North, Robert Bork, and Clarence Thomas, [Palin] is known not for her ideas but as a martyr, a symbol of the culture-war crimes of the left. To become a symbol of this stature Ms. Palin has had to do the opposite of most public figures. Where others learn to take hostility in stride, she and her fans have developed the thinnest of skins. They find offense in the most harmless remarks and diabolical calculation in the inflections of the anchorman's voice. They take insults out of context to make them seem even more insulting. They pay close attention to voices that are ordinarily ignored, relishing every blogger's sneer, every celebrity's slight, every crazy Internet rumor," -

[Wisewhiteman]

Rich K: "Geez. Just the mention of Palin draws them here like flies to a turd.Keep up the good work Dan. And remember; If you ever get lonely just type PALIN in any thread you post and you will be lonely no more."

Hello, fly. Meet turd.

[North Dallas Thirty]

"They find offense in the most harmless remarks and diabolical calculation in the inflections of the anchorman's voice. They take insults out of context to make them seem even more insulting. They pay close attention to voices that are ordinarily ignored, relishing every blogger's sneer, every celebrity's slight, every crazy Internet rumor"

Just like how Slide was screaming and throwing hissy fits over statements that he allegedly "found" on FreeRepublic, or conjecture about Obama's birth certificate, or "coded" remarks that indicate "racism".

Palin's trick that has the left tied up in knots is turning their own tactic back against them. It makes it completely obvious how hypocritical the left is when they support attacks on disabled children, demands that people produce birth certificates, and so forth when they apply to Palin.

[Slide]

ND30 as always, assbackwards: "Palin's trick that has the left tied up in knots"

The left is tied up in knots over Palin? huh? Nope, the left is pretty unanimous in its disdain for the Quitter from Wasilla, it is the right that seems to be all tied up in knots with some of the most brutal articles against her written by conservatives such as Peggy Noonan, Kathleen Parker and David Frum. The left is happy to sit back and watch the circular firing squad.

Hey ND30 hang in there. One of these days you'll get something right. Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[jr565]

Hey you know what? I think it was actually a pretty clever title. Tying the heads and tails of statistics to a subtle (but still sexist) dig at Palin which describes what the left has been saying about Palin since day one. So this conservative is not "crying" about the attack on Palin. You get me Slide? I am perfectly wlling to accept that you and the other cretins will make such self serving attacks or excuse them BUT would call out any conservatives making similar attacks against females on the left. So its not crying about the attacks. It's simply pointing out what a misogynistic creep hypocrite you are.

And we conservatives should take Slide at his word and simply start in on any female democratic politician going forward. Tits and ass comments henceforth are ok. If any democrat most especially Slide complains he is simply crying and a fairy.

We could start with Sotomayor, however I would be hard pressed to make sexual comments about her considering how ugly and unfuckable she is. Maybe its simply a commentary on democratic women in general. They don't merit sexual attacks consdiering they're so damn ugly and stupid and democratic men wouldn't screw them with their own dicks.

One positive about Sotomayor though. She looks kind of beefy and strong under all the rolls of blubber and ugliness, and I'd guess that even she would be better able to throw a baseball than Obama with his limp wristed metrosexual pitching style. Even Sotomayor would at least get a pitch over the plate and they wouldn't have to cut away the camera so as to avoid the embarassment of showing the president with such a girly throw.

Anyway, going forward lets all regale Slide with the sexist jokes and even non jokes about Clinton Boxer, Sotomayor, anyone. The meaner and more sexist the better. If we can work their families in all the better. And don't cry Slide they're just jokes. And don't call us sexist for telling them since we'd just be emulating you.

[Slide]

ahhhh... wingnutdom in full glory: "We could start with Sotomayor, however I would be hard pressed to make sexual comments about her considering how ugly and unfuckable she is. Maybe its simply a commentary on democratic women in general. They don't merit sexual attacks consdiering they're so damn ugly and stupid and democratic men wouldn't screw them with their own dicks.

One positive about Sotomayor though. She looks kind of beefy and strong under all the rolls of blubber and ugliness, and I'd guess that even she would be better able to throw a baseball than Obama with his limp wristed metrosexual pitching style. Even Sotomayor would at least get a pitch over the plate and they wouldn't have to cut away the camera so as to avoid the embarassment of showing the president with such a girly throw."

:-) gotta love 'em

[xerocky]

"Damn I enjoy that. Almost as good as sex. Now if I can figure out a way to have sex WHILE annoying the shit out of you I would be in heaven. "

Slide, you're a sad, sad little mae.

[zaugg]

Can Slide get a job or is s/he a paid troll. << not a question but said with no humor just disgust.

[Batly]

You still haven't answered why the wise Latina is the best the Democrats can come up with? I suppose compared to Janet Reno, Justice Ginsburg and Hillary Clinton she is an intellectual equal. Just as hot too! No wonder you progressives have to think up more ways to insult Palin. You are so used to being turned down by the good looking women and then have your nuts in a lock box by the hags, your frustration level is huge. Keep laughing, Obama is sinking and you know it. Nothing he is doing is working and soon enough even the uneducated masses that make up your base will notice that they are still unemployed and the schools still suck and food stamps can only go so far. Keep Sotomayer, she can't be any worse than any other lefty he would have picked. At least the independents that can read, write and think will realize what a lightweight intellect she really does have. They'll think twice about the change they fell for.

[anony mouse]

Slide wrote:
Damn I enjoy that. Almost as good as sex. Now if I can figure out a way to have sex WHILE annoying the shit out of you I would be in heaven

If Slide could figure out a way to have sex, PERIOD, that would be a miracle. But with his stunted intellectual growth and micropenis and body odor, he repels women and men to the point where even prostitutes are averse to taking him on.

[SacTownMan]

"If Slide could figure out a way to have sex, PERIOD, that would be a miracle. But with his stunted intellectual growth and micropenis and body odor, he repels women and men to the point where even prostitutes are averse to taking him on. "

Hey there's always "mother palm and her five daughters" for Slime!

The obvious poster child for birth control!

[jr565]

Slide's mom is a prostitute right? Surely she can reccomend a few women of the night that would assist little slide in getting laid. Then again, that would assume she could get off the crack pipe long enough to help poor Slide out. I feel bad. It's bad enough having a whore for a parent, but a crack whore to boot? And tell your mom Slide, that crack is so 1980's. Surely she can get with the times and at least get on meth. Then again, that would assume a means to pay for said drugs and being an ugly hag, her whoring days have been pretty tough. So crack it is. you have my sympathies Slide.
She might need some assistance from Obama to help with the whoring.Maybe he could raise taxes on the top 1% so as to give her a handout.

I kid you Slide. You're a peach. And take these as jokes. Don't be offended. Be proud of your crack whore mom.

[Slide]

"Can Slide get a job or is s/he a paid troll"

Well, if a troll's purpose is to flush out the true nature of the wingnuts on this site then I will accept the moniker since you have truly revealed yourselves to be pathetic intellectual lightweights that have to resort to schoolyard insults when your little bizarro wingnut world is challenged. If that were my intent, I could not have succeeded any better. Lets see what passes for intellectual conservative thought these days:

Slide's mom is a prostitute right?

It's bad enough having a whore for a parent, but a crack whore to boot?

She might need some assistance from Obama to help with the whoring

his stunted intellectual growth and micropenis and body odor, he repels women and men to the point where even prostitutes are averse to taking him on

The obvious poster child for birth control!

You are so used to being turned down by the good looking women and then have your nuts in a lock box by the hags, your frustration level is huge.

One positive about Sotomayor though. She looks kind of beefy and strong under all the rolls of blubber and ugliness,

They don't merit sexual attacks consdiering they're so damn ugly and stupid and democratic men wouldn't screw them with their own dicks
____________________________________________________________________________

ahhhh... the wingnut mind. A wonderful thing to behold.....lol

[anony mouse]

Clearly, you don't seem to mind the sexist jokes, and when people even object to them and point out the hypocricy of those making them suggesting that they are somehow feminists,you snigger that we are crybabies.So,the hypocricy is yours. and the crying you seem to see, is not crying so much as pointing out YET AGAIN what a bunch of demagoging and sexist and cruel people you liberals actually are. Of course, when people respond in kind and make momma jokes at your expense then of course that is the insanity of the wingnut mind. Whatever.

[Slide]

little mousy says: "demagoging and sexist and cruel people you liberals actually are"

this from the crowd that worships Limbaugh/Hannity/Coulter/O'Reilly/Riehl et al. Yes, those damn liberals are so mean and cruel. lol.. I am continually amazed at the right's crying and playing the victim card, when these guys have been viciously attacking anyone that disagreed with them for years.

My favorite of course was the drug addicted, Viagra popping, fat pig Limbaugh making fun of Michale J. Foxe's Parkinsan's disease because of his position on stem cell research. Close second is Coulter calling Edwards a "faggot".

ahhhh... the wingnut mind. A wonderful thing to behold

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/24/AR2006102400691.html
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/04/coulter.edwards/index.html

What scum.

[North Dallas Thirty]

Ah, but let's see what Slide and his fellow liberals say about gay people, shall we?

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/farrakhan_own_words2/on_homosexuals.asp

Since Slide supports and endorses this, what exactly is he criticizing?

[Batly]

At least we don't elect them to Congress ( Kennedy's son who admits to being Bi-Polar and a substance abuser, er drug addict). We don't need to try to shut down alternative opinions and then lie about the purpose of the legislation like your peeps do. I do believe I saw Schumer crying about Sotomayor, ha-ha, she is so smart and it is so wonderful that she graduated first in her class from high school and aren't we lucky to have her. Now that was whining! I still do not understand where you get off calling Republicans whiners. Your party has made an entire industry of being professional victims, look at Sotomayor, Jesse Jackson, Al ( Tawana Brawly) Sharpton and even your beloved messiah and the oh so smart vice president, who spent 30 freaking years in the Senate and still has no clue about whats going on. No wonder your party continues to encourage the poor ( your base) to stay poor, uneducated, avoid responsible behavior and live in the ghettos and public schools that failed liberal policies have built.

[Slide]

ND30 in his usual ignorant way says, "Ah, but let's see what Slide and his fellow liberals say about gay people, shall we?"

and then post a link to something that Farakhan said. Huh? LOL... Oh, ok I got it, to a dimwit like ND30 Farrakan is one of us liberals. LOL.. what moronic idiocy. Ok, let me try that now. So this is what ND30 and righties have been up to:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/24/hal-turner-arrest/

see how silly this can be?

[Slide]

Batly being batty says: "No wonder your party continues to encourage the poor ( your base) to stay poor, uneducated, avoid responsible behavior and live in the ghettos and public schools that failed liberal policies have built."

wait, you were just criticizing Sotomayer. One of those poor that you talk about that took responsibility, pulled herself up by the bootstraps and got an education and used those bad bad public schools. So do we encourage the poor to stay poor and uneducated or do we celebrate someone from poverty that did just the opposite? Guys you just mindlessly attack, attack, attack without even thinking.

The mind of a wingnut is something to behold.