« Noted Ob-Gyn Makes Levin's List | Main | More From California: "We control our 'means!'" »

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20115719ac76b970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SEIU: Tax Everybody:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

gop: drill here, drill now.
dems: spend here, spend now.

it remains a fact that the only resource the dems refuse to conserve is money.

we run out of oil? we change.
we run out of money? the govt will collapse.

california should go with "loot and pillaging day"...

you may legally rob anyone, so long as the govt gets half the proceeds.

(*I'm sure the conservatives would counter-propose that there would be no prosecution for anyone who kills tresspassers on loot and pillaging day)

this is a win-win...

the govt of CA can make a ton of money, and the conservatives can help thin the herd.

a more practical solution for california?

do a cost analysis of their top 10% of "earners" of state assistance.

offer them their average cost to state govt over the past three years as an incentive to move out of state. If they agree to taking the money, they waive all rights to move back to the state and seek state funding for a period of five years.

Wow, we just had the same thing on 6-30-09 in Springfield, Illinois.
We're at 10% unemployment and they're bullying anti-tax legislators for more spending instead of cuts

link: http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2009/06/obamas-chant-returns-at-seiu-capitol-rally-yes-we-can.html
video of the purple shirted SEIU thugs at this link.

Ya know, I'm thinking that possibly what we need to have is a federal law forbidding the formation of collective bargaining organizations that span multiple employers.

When you think about it, there's really no need for a union to be that large, and a valid reason for a union to NOT be allowed to be that large -- it IS possible for a union to abuse monopoly power, after all. It also means the individual unions will be more focused on the needs of their members, not so much on the greed of their officials or their pet political projects.

Oh, well, never mind, that horse left the barn a long time ago...

in defense of unions, which I generally abhor...

teachers. they aren't subject to some formal group of qualified professionals asessing their performance-they get stuck with the board of education. I'm sure the intentions were good, but putting unqualifed, uneducated, petty individuals over local education is a recipe for disaster.

sometimes, the unions fighting against the boards are actually doing them a favor, by keeping their decisions out of court.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad