« Light Blogging | Main | Honduras: This Is Not A Coup? »

Monday, June 29, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20115718724e4970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sotomayor: Wrong For Today's Court?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

But wait, there's more! It was not a cut & dried 5-to-4 decision. The 4 dissenting judges STILL thought that Sotomayor and her liberal activist colleagues were wrong:

"Judge Sotomayor thought it appropriate to use an unpublished summary order to dispose of the claims of the New Haven firefighters in Ricci v. DeStefano. Today the Supreme Court issued 93 pages of opinions in the case that Sotomayor acted to bury.

Further, although there is a sharp 5-4 divide among the justices, not a single justice ( http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OTBhOTEzMTZhMmMyNDczNTE5MjA4MTI0Mjk1Zjc5MDA= )thought that Judge Sotomayor acted correctly in granting summary judgment for the City of New Haven."

One would have to be an imbecile to believe that Sotomayor belongs on the Supreme Court.

Rush said the decision was "nine-zip"
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906290019

Is this another massive media cover-up of the TRUE Supreme Court decision? Conspiracy-minded wingnuts want to know.

Good to know that the white man isn't an extinct species yet, lol

"-- Further, although there is a sharp 5-4 divide among the justices, not a single justice thought that Judge Sotomayor acted correctly in granting summary judgment for the City of New Haven." --"

I find this quote hilarious because, for a brief moment, I almost think Mr Roth knows what "granting summary judgment" means.

I only know what the voices tell me, llama.

I'd still LOVE to see that test becaus I can't imagine how anyone could create a biased leiutenant test for any fire department.....unless of course they are allowing unqualified candidates to test in the first place.

Her mangling of the english language is pathetic for a lawyer and tragic for a supreme court justice.
vagrancies for vagaries, etc.
Affirmative action at work. Elevate mediocrity based on race. That is true racism.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad