Meghan McCain: Cellulite, Intellect-lite, or Both?

I really do fear we may be stuck with this relatively unaccomplished nitwit because she felt something like a rock star functioning as one of Daddy's campaign props. As she so far seems to lack any real talent for, or insight into anything, one must ask the question - will Daddy try and bequeath her a leg up in electoral politics? I hope not. The man's done enough damage to Republicans as it is.

Of course she might have the inclination to run as a Democrat thereby eventually embarrassing them and not the Republicans. Let's hope so as I'm increasingly convinced intelligence is not one of the items incorporated into her apparently corpulent frame. Until this latest brouhaha I never paid her enough attention to even realize she might be a bit plump.

Instead of intellectually debating our ideological differences about the future of the Republican party, Ms. Ingraham resorted to making fun of my age and weight, in the fashion of the mean girls in high school.

To be fair Meghan, you didn't give her much to work with on the "ideological differences" front. Other than some slapped together it's pop culture-ish so you should be cool with it positions, what is it you stand for when you aren't writing of the travails of finding a guy to position your legs behind your ears and give you a good roll in the hay? Lest you think I'm being too hard on the dear not-so-little-girl take a look at what else she recently wrote.

The election killed my personal life. OK, maybe killed is a bit of an exaggeration. But it does seem to be on life support. Of all the things people warned would happen post-election, no one ever said anything about how complicated dating would become. Especially if your dad loses the election.

If I am adult enough to understand that voting is one of the most personal things a person can do, why am I letting it affect how attracted to someone I am? I know that no one can really explain sexual attraction and why you are drawn to someone or not—but at this point in time, nothing kills my libido quite like discussing politics.

Evidently for Meghan politics is personal, ... libido not so much. Shame on you Republicans for not working harder to elect dear old dad. The country might not have ended up in better hands, but at least one pudgy chick now lacking sense enough to shut up and get a real job would be able to find her Mr. Right who wanted to get his hands on her.

Elections do have consequences. But only a self-obsessed twit would end up viewing them in context of whether or not they helped her sex life. I guess the particular screwing of America that would have come from electing John McCain as President isn't the only screwing that was prevented on election night November 2008.

See Michelle Malkin and Donald Douglas for more.

Comments

[rrpjr]

This girl is stupid on a kind of sociologically interesting level. On one hand, we should hope that she keeps making statements as they offer signal testament to an idiocy at large in the world and worth keeping track of through an ongoing diary. On the other hand, she is really stupid, and the problems associated with conspicuous stupidity are not to be dismissed.

[mary]

But, everyone reads her blog. Even libs and dems.

[K]

lol you're pretty foul. i thought conservatives put all the blame for disgusting commentary on liberals? hypocrite. also, good job totally proving her point. sexist loser. let's see how much you weigh.

[forked tongue]

Um, actually, she talked about "dating." You talked about "finding a guy to position [her] legs behind [her] ears." Do you have any self-consciousness at all about being a loutish vulgarian whom any woman in her right mind would flee?

[BlogDog]

The Paris Hilton of politics

[Dan Riehl]

she talked about "dating."

So you're saying she's so stupid she doesn't know what "sexual attraction" and "libido" actually mean? I guess a Columbia education isn't what it's cracked up to be.

"no one can really explain sexual attraction and why you are drawn to someone or not—but at this point in time, nothing kills my libido"

[M.B.]

Angry? Check

Reactionary? Check

Bullying? Check

Spouting empty insults to cover up an embarrassing lack coherent and constructive ideas? Check

Attacking their young? Check

Welcome to the Grand Ole Party, 2009.

[Sp0rsk]

Key to understanding the thoughts of Dan Riehl on topics such as this is the knowledge that the last time Dan Riehl saw a human vagina without paying for the privilege was the day that Dan Riehl was born.

[Seriously?]

Wow. Sexistdouchebagsayswhat?

[alex]

she's not the brightest, but, judging from what you wrote, neither are you.

have fun burning your party into the ground.

[Helen]

You are a pathetic little whiny man with piddity winky dick who is bitter because the girls won't sleep with you.

Shut the fuck up and grow a spine, you dirty pile of dog shit.

[Galileo Broome]

I have a two word response for you butt munch: Sarah Palin. And I would do Meghan McCain in a heatbeat.