Last Call

My apologies, as I've said, I know people are sick of it. But as long as generic hits keep coming to my URL from The Corner, which is unusual in this context, new content will go below.

How can you fight Liberalism when you have to change a link URL away from my criticism of Goldberg to my main url at the top of the page?

Yeah, that's precisely what, I assume, Jonah did.

Freedom fighter! We can censor criticism as good as the Left!

Sad.

In case you are interested in the history Corner readers.

See here. And here.

Thanks for dropping by. Plenty of comments all around below posts, both pro and con. None are being censored here. It isn't the way we roll.

Comments

[LOL]

Again, the Corner is America's shittiest website.

[Sally]

I don't really know what this tiff is about but there's nothing that drives me away from a site quicker than seeing posts on the writer's spat with another blogger. It's so...Andrew Sullivan.

[mcg]

I'm not surprised he didn't respond. Why should he? I assume (there's that word again) that your email to him made no attempt to apologize for your stupid attack; instead you just tried to vault to the high road after the fact. And then you have the gall to say you'd rather "debate ideas?" Bullshit.

I notice you didn't produce any evidence that the link was changed retroactively. Therefore, I'm going to assume (there's that word again) that you didn't actually have any evidence to the effect.

[Dan]

Geesh, mcq, does he have family in Austin? Give it a freakin rest.

[Hall Monitor]

Well, at least Dan links to the posts he disagrees with; Andrew Sullivan often doesn't even do that.

But it is interesting: this thread was longer late last night. It would seem that Dan's claim that "none are being censored here" is no longer operative. I guess that's just the way he rolls!

[mcg]

Nah, I don't have any particular affinity for Goldberg. I just get a bee in my bonnet about certain kinds of arrogant, over-the-top blogging, and it's hard to shake. Kind of like Dan hasn't been able to let his attacks on Goldberg rest, either.

But since he's apparently censoring me now I'll quit.

[Philip McDaniel]

"I don't really know what this tiff is about but there's nothing that drives me away from a site quicker than..."
By by, Sally, it was nice not knowing ya. Ditto, mcq (mcquack?)

[Dan Riehl]

"Dan's claim that "none are being censored here" is no longer operative."

Wrong, you are referencing a previous post. It and the comments on it are still there. See link:

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2008/12/my-apologies.html

[mcg]

Yes, I know. Now, how do you reach that previous post from the front page of your blog?

[mcg]

BTW, the link is now fixed over in The Corner.

[Dan]

You have no point, mcq. Rather than continuing to raise the old post I made a new one after some blogging. You're starting to scare me, guy. lol If I had referenced it for some reason, I would have linked it.

[Dan Riehl]

By the way Mcq - are you the McQ from Q and O?

[mcg]

Nah. I'm actually MCG not MCQ. It's a common misreading caused by the underlining.