Why Read The Book?

Poor See-dubya claims to have had to read Ayers book to reveal what Obama's neighborhood looked like from Ayres perspective:

Pages 81-82 caught my eye:

He could have just read my blog back in ... February! (with a screencap from the book)

Did Obama really require much of an introduction to the unapologetic terrorist: screen cap from page 81 of Ayre's 1998 book? The liberal's new political messiah may have had some pretty interesting friends. Why was Ayres calling Obama a "writer" in 1998? Or was this written at an earlier time, with their friendship going back to before Obama entered politics? Neither man is commenting on the relationship. Hmm.

I found the Farrahkhan reference particularly troubling.

Keeping RWviewers informed ahead of the curve, that's what I do. The job the mainstream media just won't do. heh!

Comments

[Lala]

Farrahkhan is having some kind of renew the faith meeting this weekend, I think.

[mary]

yep, they are going to proselytize now. Apparently before they kept more to themselves.

[Lala]

Charles Barron, former Black Panther, current NYC Councilman sought out by Obama

http://newsbusters.org/node/13780

Plus, here's part of Barron's opinion of Obama from the New York Observer

“He came from the South Side of Chicago. That’s a black community where he took care and fought for black people on the South Side of Chicago. He’s introduced racial profiling legislation in the state of Illinois. His pastor, Jeremiah Wright believes in black liberation theology. He’s done a lot. He’s speaking about poverty now.”

When asked about the differences between Barron and Obama’s approaches to black nationalism, Barron replied:

“He said he supports the black community. He’s said he’s been black all his life. You said he’s against black nationalism. He never said that. Matter of fact, he goes to a black liberation theologist church where they believe in a black Christ. So, he is for black people."

http://www.observer.com/2007/charles-barron-endorses-defends-barack-obama

[Fred Beloit]

This is a very interesting, tangential, well-written article in the Weekly Standard, "Class Will Tell by Sam Schulman". It makes a good argument that many liberals aren't really class warriors. They are very simply class snobs:

"[Noam] Scheiber's attempt to understand Sarah Palin, detailed in the New Republic, took him all the way to Wasilla, as strange to him as Ethiopia to Evelyn Waugh. Scheiber spoke to various people from Palin's past, all of whom have two things in common: Every one of them is smarter than Palin and none of them has been heard of since their encounter with her. Scheiber's pet specimen among what he calls "the more urbane members of the community" is a Dartmouth graduate who reads Civil War histories, self-published a book, and not only does but "savors" the New York Times crossword puzzle. This sort of résumé wouldn't get your niece an unpaid internship on L Street--but for a Rhodes Scholar lost in Alaska, the Dartmouth degree, the Civil War buffery, the Times crossword puzzle all take on huge significance. Unable to comprehend how Palin could have outpaced the Wasilla gentry, poor Scheiber clings for dear life to these sad fragments of class dignity."

Love it, Boob? Recognize yourself?

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/715lnilj.asp

[Fred Beloit]

From the same: "The influential section of our upper-middle class, which lives in media centers, does, of course, have an understanding of the ethic of service, and a special familiarity with men in uniforms decorated with epaulets. Paula Throckmorton-Zakaria finds the spirit of service right at home in Manhattan:

We may not have a ''servant'' class in the strict Victorian sense, but a "service" class we have indeed, and it is serving us. How do we square our egalitarian self-conceit with a liveried doorman? Not easily. For non-New Yorkers, doormen are the guys who carry the bags, organize the packages and tell you who stopped by to see your 15-year-old while you were out. They also open the door.

Receiving all those services in exchange for a partially deductible maintenance fee and a Christmas tip, we don't much miss the small matter of McCain's authentic service to his country. I, my children, and perhaps the Sulzberger and Couric children spent years passing through doors opened by uniformed, epauletted men on the way to private schools that were proud to teach an ethic of service. The experience didn't equip us to recognize the real thing."

[mary]

BTw, the college kids who find out that you get a measly 4 grand and then you owe 4 years, say thanks but no thanks.

[WBestPresidentEver]

OBAMA, RADICAL MENTOR SAUL ALINSKY, AND MARXIST LIBERATION THEOLOGY

There is quite a connection between Obama and the Industrial Areas Foundation, a radical organization located in Chicago (Obama’s turf) and the ideological heir of Saul Alinsky, a notorious revolutionary who dedicated his mail work (Rules for Rebels) to Satan.

Obama’s mentor Saul Alinsky began his book Rules for Radicals:

“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

All you need to do is enter in Google first, “Obama”, then “IAF”. Check around and you will be surprised.

The radical Marxist, Saul Alinsky, was the mentor of both, Hillary and Obama and his book, “Rules for Radicals” is the bible for radicals as the “Mein Kampf ‘ was for the Nazis. As a matter of fact, Hillary based her graduation thesis on Alinsky’s works.

Pope Benedict XVI, who as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith , spearheaded the fight of Pope John Paul II against the infiltration of the Church by the Marxists through the so called “Liberation Theology”, writing in “ Truth and Tolerance” of the fall of the Soviet Union stated clearly his stand on the “Liberation Theology”:

“...where the Marxist ideology of liberation had been consistently applied, a total lack of freedom had developed, whose horrors were now laid bare before the eyes of the entire world. Wherever politics tries to be redemptive, it is promising too much. Where it wishes to do the work of God, it becomes not divine, but demonic.”

For Alinsky and his disciples:

“ There are no rules for revolution any more than there are rules for love or rules for happiness, but there are rules for radicals who want to change their world”

“ Whatever Obama’s concrete plans are, they ought to aligned with his political mentor, Saul Alinsky, and his spiritual mentor and liberation theology specialist, Rev. Jeremiah Wright.”

“ All this is in addition to Obama’s long-term membership in an exclusively African-American church, affiliated with the United Church of Christ, founded on the teachings of Black Liberation Theology, a Marxist ideology that incorporates racist concepts.”

“ Based on his record, we could expect most of the following:

-More funding of Planned Parenthood.
-Socialist medicine including abortion, pills for teens, etc., for free!
-More explicit ------------- ed in high school. Eventually in junior high!!
-ACLU-type removal of evidences of America’s Christian heritage.
-Same ------------- marriage. Pressure put on more companies and churches either to stop opposing homosexuality, or to actively support or endorse it.
-Socialist equalizing of people’s incomes—or at least lots of little attempts to move things even more in that direction.
-Screws turned on home schools, Christian schools and private schools in general.
-Jihadists around the world will see his election as a green light to pick up their tempo. (This may be the least likely outcome of any on the list. But still fairly likely.)”
“ If that sounds extreme, consider that not only did Obama and Clinton oppose Alito—pretty much all the Dems did—but he also opposed Roberts and filibustered Alito. So even a mild judicial conservative, which is what Alito and Roberts are, is intolerable to Obama. He only wants judges who will continue the court-led deconstruction of American society!”

There is need for someone with the right skills and time to work on uncovering what is really behind Obama who, for all we know, might become President of the United States. At least our people have the right to know who they are voting for.

Note: Some quotes are from “Obama’s Politics of Collective Redemption” by: Kyle-Anne Shiver

[Steven P]

Is it so damn hard to spell Ayers' name correctly? I know it is a small matter but I've seen so many supposedly serious bloggers spell his name wrong that it is starting to drive this anal retentive leftist hater up a wall.

If nothing else you're reducing the number of Google hits which this scumbag's name yields! lol.

[WBestPresidentEver]

Please don't drive the Kool aide folks.

Can the United States Survive a Marxist President?

from the AMERICAN DAUGHTER.
http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?p=2066

By Antonio Sosa | Saturday, October 18th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
Barack Obama has had close ties to Marxists, including unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and Obama’s relative Kenya’s Odinga, “Your Agent for Change,” the violent anti-American thug who made a pact with the Muslims to institute Sharia (Islamic law). Those ties, added to his plans to “redistribute the wealth,” concern many Americans.

There’s the hope, however, that even if Obama were elected, the checks and balances in the U.S. will make it impossible for Obama to impose Marxism in the U.S. and deliver the U.S. to its enemies.

But are those checks and balances in place? With Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the U.S. Congress has turned dangerously left and is being manipulated by the likes of Chávez and his Islamic terrorists and Russian friends. Only the worst can be expected if the U.S. ends up with a Marxist president working with a Congress manipulated by Marxists and Islamic terrorists.

Nancy Pelosi and Chávez
On April 2008, Latin American U.S. friends were shocked to learn that Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi not only refused to step forward and approve the vital Colombia free-trade agreement, but she prevented anyone else voting on it.

After President Bush submitted the pact to a vote under fast-track rules, she changed them to ensure it wouldn’t go anywhere anytime soon. By a 224 to 195 House vote, the voting timeline rule on trade pacts was changed from 90 days to whenever. Pelosi now can hold up Colombia’s treaty however long her caprice dictates.

“The message Democrats sent today,” Bush warned after Thursday’s vote, “is that no matter how steadfastly you stand with us, we will turn our backs on you when it is politically convenient.” President Bush was right.

In spite of tremendous pressure and intimidation from Chávez, Correa, FARC and all other anti-U.S. forces, Colombia’s president Álvaro Uribe has remained a steadfast friend of the U.S. And he has been able to provide more security and prosperity to Colombians than any other president in recent history.

Democrats Freeze the Colombian FTA with the “Chavez Rule,” was the headline at Noticias 24 following Pelosi’s historic move to block free trade with Colombia. (See Latin American Media Paints Pelosi As a Chavez Lackey.)

Within hours of the vote, Latin American media already were calling Pelosi’s maneuver the “Chavez Rule.”

Latin Americans could not understand how Pelosi could choose to harm America’s best ally in Latin America, punishing a vibrant democracy by isolating it from all the other nations that have sought and won free trade.

Unlike military aid, the free trade agreement costs the U.S. nothing, is too small to have much impact on the U.S. economy and is mainly about ending tariffs on U.S. goods sold in Colombia, matching the no-tariff trade that Colombian firms already get here. Chavez’s propaganda machine manipulated Pelosi and Congress.

In July 2008, Pelosi illicitly stepped outside her role as Speaker and attempted to institute her own foreign policy by communicating with left-wing Colombian Piedad Córdoba, telling her that she and Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) were ready to help them arrange swaps of captured terrorists for hostages held by FARC terrorists. (Foreign policy is the exclusive role of the president and not the legislative branch.)

Piedad Córdoba, a close friend of Chavez, is a frequent visitor to the Venezuelan presidential palace. Córdoba is also trusted by the FARC and is often photographed with its leaders. She is an enemy of Uribe. Why was Pelosi working with an enemy of Uribe, a U.S. friend?

Informed Latin Americans wonder why Democratic Party leaders of the U.S. Congress are supporting the anti-U.S. Chavez-Morales-Correa bloc and are hurting U.S. friend Uribe. (Read USA Democratic Party Called Now to Declare Allegiances to Liberty or Andean Narco-communism.)

Manipulated by Chavez, Islamic terrorists and other enemies of the U.S., Americans may select the wrong candidate and destroy their future and the future of their children. It happened to Venezuelans, Bolivians and Ecuadorians who believed in CHANGE and YES WE CAN.

Freedom loving Venezuelans, Bolivians and Ecuadorians are hoping that a free and democratic U.S. will help them free themselves from Chavez, Russia and Iran. Those hopes may vanish if Obama is elected.

Wake up, Americans! It’s not too late yet. Save your country and save the world!

[mary]

" Antonio Sosa, A naturalized U.S. citizen, Antonio Sosa was born in Ecuador, studied linguistics, and taught English and Spanish as foreign languages, first in Ecuador and then in the U.S. Sosa, who has traveled extensively and is in contact with people from all over the world, currently works as a writer/translator."
http://frontpage.americandaughter.com/?p=2066

It just irks me, he criticizes Palin's lack of world travel yet he has really only been to the middle east and africa. He missed a very important place, South America. Not to mention all of europe. Oh wait, he went on his european vacation during the campaign.

[AdrianS]

Hey, guess what I found out:

Dubai Ports rejection helped US economic growth

http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0307/0307dubaiportsrejec.htm

============================================================

Reject Barack Hussein Obama, the Dubai candidate, and help US economic growth!

Obama is a national threat:

Quote from the Barack Obama book, Audacity of Hope by Barack Obama: “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

And this man wants to be President? I and several tens of millions of people think NOT.

http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=68

http://www.nextgenerationcorp.com/NextGenBlog/?p=32

[BobinStamford]

Rednecks is scary racist and stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvPJOQhXrak

And edukated too!!

[Steven P]

"Rednecks is scary racist and stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvPJOQhXrak

And edukated too!!"

The difference between the right and the left is that mainstream conservatives want even ordinary morons who think like this to rot in hell. The same level of ugly thinking on the left can get you elected, get you tenure at a university or even a column with a mainstream media outlet!

[Steven P]

"Rednecks is scary racist and stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvPJOQhXrak

And edukated too!!"

The difference between the right and the left is that mainstream conservatives want even ordinary morons who think like this to rot in hell. The same level of ugly thinking on the left can get you elected, get you tenure at a university or even a column with a mainstream media outlet!

[Anna]

There are those of us who believe Ayers wrote Obama's book. Note all the nautical metaphors, writing style, etc.

Oh, yes, there is much more to this than meets the eye.