« ACORN And Obama: So Much For Non-Partisan | Main | McCain Putting More Offices In ... Iowa? »

Saturday, October 11, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e20105357f8d91970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference At Least We Know Why Sullivan Likes The Big O:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Appeals Court Sides With Ohio Secretary of State
Court sets aside federal judge's order that Jennifer Brunner institute the means to verify voter registration information.
AP
Saturday, October 11, 2008
CINCINNATI - A federal appeals court sided with Ohio's top elections official Friday in her running battle with Republicans over how to verify the eligibility of newly registered voters.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals set aside a federal judge's order a day earlier that Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner institute the means to verify voter registration information and make it available to Ohio's 88 county election boards."
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/11/appeals-court-sides-ohio-secretary-state/

You know I sent this article to a couple of friends and what is so frightening to me is that the first response was "sure, the election is fixed." and then everyone after that agreed with him. It is downright demoralizing and they all weren't republicans some are dems who truly do believe that they have nothing to worry about cause their guy is definitely winning this election. Almost makes you think you don't need to bother to vote this year as we are "electing" a dictator.

"WORLD FIX"
from drudge.

First nationalization.

Next what? Globalization?

ron paul just warned against this on cavuto.

Nationalization? No one on Cavuto is advocating this. Globalization exists and is the reason Bush is meeting with the leaders of the richer countries in order to 'fix' the world. We go down, they go down. Then we all fall down.

Two questions:

Why did David or someone amend the Wiki article to take out "his partner"?

Does Militant Michelle have any gaydar?

Jaime, read yesterday's "communique" from Treasury Secretary Paulson. Wome of the financial websites have the full text with explanation.

Cavuto had an excellent program this morning. With discussion about everything, it was well done.

Again by making the remark about Andrew Sullivan, you're proving that you're homophobic. I guess it's sad that you're resorting to making fun of people over the internet but it seems to be a common theme with Republicans. You can talk shit about people behind their back, on the internet, on tv but you won't say it to their face. Real Classy.

As an aside. Yesterday on a financial thread one of the commenters said that he felt that Hillary should be the candidate. I have never seen anyone attacked like he was. Interestingly enough these narrow minded people seemed to think that telling him that the Senator has a "lesbian lover" was like the worst thing they could be saying about her. This, mind you, is being said about a sitting Senator, married, yes married, to an ex President. And, people who work for her say unabashedly that she is really in love with her husband. So, that leads me to my question. With the primaries and such over, with BO obviously the candidate, why did they find it necessary to attack the person who innocently said he felt she should be the candidate? What is the point at this point?

mj, I honestly don't get where you think dan or any republican or conservative is "homo phobic". That is simply, in this day and age, a ridiculous charge. Please get with the program.

"mj, I honestly don't get where you think dan or any republican or conservative is "homo phobic". That is simply, in this day and age, a ridiculous charge. Please get with the program."

Really? Are you sure about that? What about the conservatives taped waiting to see McCain chanting "hippie faggots"...were they long haired bundles of sticks?


Wow, talk about homophobia

http://islaminaction08.blogspot.com/2008/10/us-muslims-attack-gay-men-in.html

Saturday, October 11, 2008
U.S. Muslims Attack gay man in Washington~Video
The attacks that we see across the Islamic world on non-Muslims by Muslims are once again on the rise in the USA. The Muslim attackers even told the gay man that he would be stoned to death in their country. Such a "peaceful" religion.

Were they McCain supporters?

Spartan you know very well they weren't. They always support their own so BO is their man.

Spartan, I really think all these alleged conservative are democratic plants. Real americans don't behave that way, sorry. BO thinks if he plants people to do these things and people assume they are republicans or conservatives then he will have an edge. I think it will back fire on him.

Spartan, I really think all these alleged conservative are democratic plants. Real americans don't behave that way, sorry. BO thinks if he plants people to do these things and people assume they are republicans or conservatives then he will have an edge. I think it will back fire on him.

Posted by: mary | Saturday, October 11, 2008 at 02:35 PM


Really? Plants? You're crazy right? How about the lady who called Obama an Arab, was she a plant? I'm sorry if they don't fit into your vision of good friendly conservatives are like but those people are genuine Mary.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad