The Enquirer breaks a photo of John Edwards and love child. So, Edwards is now pretty much proven to be having an illicit affair ... and Mickey Kaus gets to have the orgasm.
I think Mr. Two Americas is getting short-changed in that deal somehow.
« Obama's Mazen Asbahi Linked Directly To Wahhabi Lobby | Main | More Pap From The Gristmill »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e553ee023b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This Is So Unfair:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
This story may or may not be true, but that photo doesn't prove it one way or the other...it looks about as convincing as your average Big Foot photo.
Posted by: Spartan112 | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Spartan112, please ... don't embarass yourself. Edwards is what? Oh, a lawyer .... not to mention a rich one - yeah, that's right. ha ha ha
If this story wasn't rock solid, there wouldn't be a Nat Enq at this point - it would be Edwards and Sons - or should I say "love childs" Publishing.
Puhlease! Step away from the kool-aid container, guy ... you're worrying me.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 01:02 PM
Better start praying to Almighty Lord Jeeebus!!
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63426
Teh bush is on teh bottle.
Posted by: MS141 | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 01:23 PM
John Edwards or Bat Boy. We report, you decide.
"-- Puhlease! Step away from the kool-aid container, guy ... you're worrying me. --"
LOLS! It's not like the National Enquirer has been sued, repeatedly, over this exact same bullshit. And its certainly not like Edwards, being a trial lawyer, knows exactly the risk/reward pay-off of suing a tabloid that will just make even more money off the ensuing publication of the legal battle.
You silly Lie-bruls. Everything in the National Enquirer is AIR TIGHT! That's why I'm consulting my super-psychic friend right now to get a giant stack of winning lottery numbers. I'll be laughing all the way to the bank while you guys question whether John Edwards had a love child.
Ha!
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 02:05 PM
I never said the story wasn't true, just that the photo proved nothing. Besides, you think this is the first time the NE has published a story about someone with deep pockets? Certainly they've published stories about far more powerful people than John Edwards, people with far better lawyers than he could ever dream of being.
Posted by: Spartan112 | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 02:09 PM
If its true, Edwards is done.
I guess, for his sake, and the Mrs, I hope its BS.
OT
Today is the annniversry of a very special day.
On this day 7 years ago, future Supreme Court nominee Harriet “The eye Shadow Knows” Miers handed Dubya a memo which read “Bin laden determined to strike in US”
Dubya reponded, “Harriet, where’s my wacker? Ther’s some brush on the back-20 I wanna clear.”
Posted by: Mr DeBakey | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 03:11 PM
"-- If its true, Edwards is done. --"
Yeah, he'll never win the Presidency now. And his chances of keeping his Senate seat are close to zero.
"-- I guess, for his sake, and the Mrs, I hope its BS. --"
It is. No one tries this hard to push a tabloid story if they've got anything remotely approaching truthful evidence. The Loch Ness monster had better footage.
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 03:51 PM
The folks at the Nat-Enq really know how to tastefully apply that Photoshop Gaussian blur filter.
But Edwards is practically a non-factor anyway.
Posted by: seekeronos | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 04:00 PM
"So, Edwards is now pretty much proven to be having an illicit affair"
Well, mebe. But, since it is racist to bring up the subject of fatherless children in connection with a Democratic, you should have ignored it as the MSM is doing.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 04:34 PM
Too bad he could have been more like a good republican and spent his off days poking guys, he wouldn't have left any evidence behind.
Posted by: Spartan112 | Wednesday, August 06, 2008 at 06:44 PM
Spart, Barney Frank isn't going to invite you to his digs any more if you keep up this homophobe stuff.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Thursday, August 07, 2008 at 08:39 AM
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/63426
When do you start reporting on this nugget Dan?
Posted by: Spartan112 | Thursday, August 07, 2008 at 03:25 PM