Edwards In Blue

Don't know if this has been circulating, looks like Edwards in that blue shirt from the Enquirer pic.

Compare this

to this one

Don't let the sleeves being pushed up when he's holding the baby throw you.

Comments

[Worst President Ever]

In other "news", Russia nnd Georgia go to war.

Certainly not up to the world-shaking news flash that politicians can be unfaithful. But if the topic is adulterous politicians, there's some interesting stuff about John McCain you can look into.

[ET]

Ah. One of the lefty defenders emerges to dismiss the Edwards story. Of course, a week ago it wasn't true and the Enquirer was a tabloid rag. Now, there are more important issues.

Admit it, wpe. You were wrong. Edwards is a creep. And you are a useless shill.

[Worst President Ever]

If you think Edwards being an adulterer is more important then the Georgia / Russia war - then your judgement really, really sucks.

And if adultery is at the top of your list of World Concerns - news flash for ya, McCain has a bit of a history there himself. And he's actually running for something, whereas Edwards ain't.

[templar knight]

Worst, I think the war between Russia and Georgia is being well covered, and this is a blog, not a news network. Duh!

And ET, I couldn't have said it better, myself. Ouch!

[Worst President Ever]

Let's talk about other adulterers as well then. Say, start with McCain. Because he may be our next president, whereas Edwards won't. And I assume ET doesn't want a "creep" adulterer for president.

[ET]

Another typical deflection, wpe. You libs are nothing if not consistent. You and your cohorts on this site blasted any acknowledgment that the Edwards story was legit. Not one of you has emerged since the story was confirmed to admit that you were 100% dead wrong. I don't expect any of you will.

Useless.

[Worst President Ever]

No, I never posted about Edwards.

1. ET calls Edward's a creep for being an adulterer
2. McCain is an adulterer
3. Is McCain also a creep? Or is adultery OK if you're a Republican?

[seekeronos]

"---
1. ET calls Edward's a creep for being an adulterer
2. McCain is an adulterer
3. Is McCain also a creep? Or is adultery OK if you're a Republican?
---"

1). Edward's creepiness-as-a-result-of-his-adultery is compounded because of the recentness of his error (check the baby recent popping out of mistress's uterus) AND the amount of deception involved (doing this WHILE runing for POTUS).

2. Yes, McCain was a lousy sack of sheep dung for leaving his crippled first wife for a tropy wife/millionaire heiress. But his offenses are diluted quite a bit by time and the fact that this bit of his history were well known - some 20 years before he ran for POTUS.

3). Adultery is never "OK", and it is a sin as grave as any other, and requires repentance and the forgiveness through Christ, as well as the forgiveness of the parties affected by the sin (such as any children, the former spouse, etc.)

[Worst President Ever]

Grading Sin on a curve - how Moral Relativist of you. And I never realized Sin was like milk - it comes with an expiration date.

[SacTownMan]

Hey President Carter can you just once use some intellectual honesty here.

Your boy Edwards is an ambulance chasing, slimeball lawyer who just happened to be carrying on an affair while running for POTUS and having his spouse dying from cancer.

His actions combined with the complete lack of coverage from the MSM is directly related to Hillary losing the nomination. The votes he pulled away in the early part of the election would have likely gone to her and not Barry.

Edwards is a POS and for you to spend so much time whining like a little baby about "yea but your guy did it too" doesn't carry any weight in your argument. It only makes you look like the whiny little troll you are!

[Worst President Ever]

Get a clue SacO - McCain is running for president - Edwards is done, Questions about McSame's ethics and actions are actually relevant. Edwards, not so much.

So yeah, I'm a lot more concerned with McCain being an adulterer than I am about than Edward being one.

[Fred Beloit]

This is perfectly understandable, my dear Worst:
"So yeah, I'm a lot more concerned with McCain being an adulterer than I am about than[sis] Edward[sic] being one."
It is understandable because it is the product of Progressive "thinking" at its finest. Congratulations on your perspicacity. But personally I note little Edwardsian details like, oh, his wife's cancer and his being a candidate for president during the footsies, his using campaign money to pay her salary and her expenses for trysts, and his patently false denial that he is the father, in effect disowning the poor little bugger. Outrageous.

[Spartan112]

Fred while what you say might be true, it's also known that McCain was stepping out on his disabled wife with a woman wayyyyyy younger than him. He was working for the Pentagon at the time and may have even flown himself and/or Cindy to their meeting places. Men do stupid things when they are having affairs, even illegal things this we have all known for some time. What does the Edwards affair have to to with this presidential race? Nothing. Edwards is out and has been for some time, Obama is the nominee and as far as we know his slate is clean in this regard so attempting to conflate the Edwards affair into so type of admonition of the Obama candidacy is intellectually vacant. Of course I would expect nothing lest from the McCain campaign.

[Spartan112]

Oh and Fred, how is Edwards denial that he's the child's father the same as disowning him? That would only be the case if he actually were the father. Someone else has already stepped up and said they were the father and according to all involved parties the time line just doesn't work out.

[seekeronos]

"--- Grading Sin on a curve - how Moral Relativist of you. And I never realized Sin was like milk - it comes with an expiration date. ---"

Allow me to clarify:

It is not I who have graded sin on a curve. Sin is sin, and unless it is washed away by the Precious Blood of Jesus, it remains as an indelible mark on a person's soul.

But most people do tend to dilute and forget sin especially through the lens of time: whereas McCain's wickedness was a matter of fact nearly 30 years ago, Edwards was unable to keep his John Jr. in his proper place; he was quite busily tomcatting about WHILE campaigning for his party's nomination for POTUS.

People do tend to rate that differently, and yes, morally relativistically.

God on the other hand, does not. To His eyes, it would be like seeing an outside overloaded garbage can after a summer rain storm full of maggots.

[seekeronos]

.