« Public Radio, Obama And The Surge | Main | Top Secret: World Media Descends On Iraq »

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e553a3edea8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Understanding Jackson's Just Released Comment:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Victor Hanson has to kick Obie in the thighs 'cause Krauthammer has already kicked Obie's butt clear off.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDM3Yjc4MzRkNWU3YTExZWYxOWE4MTQyNjQxOTkyNjU=

Meanwhile, the absolutely lowest and worst 9 to 14 percenter speakess of the house, insults the President (again), refuses to get a spending bill together, and wants to ensure we pay $35 per gallon of gas in the near future, bless her heart.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/17/pelosi.interview/

Simple facts on the ground are that the vast majority of negroes, especially youth, are more prone to acting on their violent urges.

Ever see "The Boondocks", a cartoon drawn by a young negro about two young negroes living with their grandfather?

It may be a bit of a satire, but the typical levels of violence and the depiction of the "nigga moment"

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/128845/nigga_moment/

Even a satire has its roots in truth. The Jena 6 had their "nigga moment", and they deserve to suffer under the mailed fist of justice.


Ahh the true Seek comes out...stock up on ammo and canned food, here comes the apocalypse.

And before y'all hop on top of me for that last remark, I'd have it the same way for a gang of whites beating up on a black man.

Or a group of any other people beating up on one other person. Race shouldn't figure into this, but not surprisingly, it does aggravate the matter by getting the entire community up in a rage, to say nothing of fueling the professional race-baiters, Sharpton, Farrakhan, Wright, Duke, et al.


And yet race figured into your response...go figure.

And before y'all hop on top of me for that last remark, I'd have it the same way for a gang of whites beating up on a black man.

Rodney King anyone?

I have some questions about Big Al's proposal to go completely to wind, solar, and geothermal to generate electricity by 2018, is it?

Wind: Won't wind mills on a massive scale gradually, or quickly for all I know, slow down the movement of the earth's atmosphere? Won't this cause serious climate problems?

Solar: Won't collecting heat from the sun on a massive scale rather than letting it radiate back out into space increase cause global warming rather than reduce or eliminate it?

Geothermal: What would be the consequences of drawing heat from below the earth's surface on a massive scale. Wouldn't this cause more global warming at the surface?

Now I have some understanding of the idea of conservation of energy (COE), but perhaps some of the readers would have some more informed opinion about how COE might apply to my questions.

Fred,
I don't know either. Do hydroelectric plants slow down waterfalls? Are oil and natural gas the things that are burning in volcanoes?

Ireland just installed a tide-driven hydroelectric thingy. Will they slow the tide?

Fred,

http://www.dailytech.com/Myth+of+Consensus+Explodes+APS+Opens+Global+Warming+Debate/article12403.htm

also Instapundit.com has a link to another article about carbon credits and taxes.

It is encouraging to see infighting within the enemy camp. We will need all the help that we can get.

"--- Rodney King anyone? ---"

And when the jury handed down its verdict, and it wasn't the one that most of the black community wasn't satisfied with, they decided to take justice into their own hands, forming lynch mobs that indiscriminately targeted anyone with non-black skin.

The Rodney King race riots of 1992.

So do two wrongs make a right after all?

There are a few things you can count on in this world. Death, taxes and white liberals coming to the defense of black thugs. That is why it is going to be wonderful when these black thugs give these liberals what they have coming to them. Liberals, YOU are the ones who have turned these people loose, so don't complain when you are the target. Its called karma.

Whoops, here's another example of just what I'm talking about. A white family consisting of the husband, wife and three daughters attended a theme park in Minneapolis over the July 4th weekend. The family was returning to their vehicle when the 12-year old girl was attacked by a thug. The father intervened to protect his daughter, the thug called for help, and he and seven of his friends proceeded to try to kill this guy, beating him senseless, taking turns stomping his head. The security guards at the park had no weapons and didn't intervene. The man's wife and daughters tried to help him.

Two things here, why do these people always want to gang up? Never fight a guy one on one. The other thing that comes to my mind is why it has taken this story so long to come out in the media.

Now this is the best arguement in the world for concealed carry and the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. If there were ever some SOB's who should have been shot down like the animals they were acting like, then these fit the bill.

"They formed lynch mobs..."

Most excellent point, seek. That is exactly what they did, killing and maiming people who had absolutely nothing to do with Rodney King's beating. But I'm quite sure there is a white liberal who can explain it all away. Disgusting!

Jackson. He'll never eat arugula in this town again.

"YOU are the ones who have turned these people loose"

Care to explain who YOU is, and who "those people" are? Because if you're talking about violent behavior, it's not isolate to one ethnic group.

****
Three white men with suspected ties to the Ku Klux Klan chained James Byrd, Jr. (a Black hitchhiker), to the back of a pickup truck and dragged him to his death.

****
Shortly after midnight on October 7, 1998, 21-year-old Shepard met McKinney and Henderson in a bar. McKinney and Henderson posed as gay men and offered Shepard a ride in their car.[3] Subsequently, Shepard was robbed, pistol whipped, tortured, tied to a fence in a remote, rural area, and left to die.

****
Tuskegee Institute records of lynchings between the years 1880 and 1951 show 3,437 African-American victims, as well as 1,293 white victims.

One of the most disgusting crimes perpetrated by black thugs against white people - virtually ignored by the MSM - because it wasn't white on black.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom

Actually, I would say that violence is a big, big problem with blacks

http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-09-24hm.html

excerpt --


Heather Mac Donald
The Jena Dodge
Demonstrators and the media avoid the stubborn truths of black social breakdown.
24 September 2007

The reason that the black incarceration rate is the highest in the country is that blacks have the highest crime rate—by a long shot. Don’t trust the police, prosecutors, or judges to give a fair picture of black crime? Then go where the bodies are. Los Angeles is representative. In the first seven months of 2007, blacks in Los Angeles were murdered at a rate ten times that of whites and Asians. Who’s killing them? It’s not whites and Asians. While a minor proportion of the assailants of blacks are Hispanic, the vast majority are black themselves. Nationally, blacks commit murder at about eight times the frequency of whites. In New York, any given violent crime is 13 times more likely to have been committed by a black person than by a white person, according to the reports of victims and witnesses. Though they are only 24 percent of the city’s population, blacks committed 68.5 percent of all murders, rapes, robberies, and assaults in New York last year. Whites, who make up 34.5 percent of New Yorkers, committed only 5.3 percent of violent crimes. These ratios are similar across the country. In Los Angeles, blacks committed 41 percent of all robberies in 2001, according to victims’ descriptions, though they constitute only 11 percent of the city’s population. Robbery victims identified whites, who make up 30 percent of the Los Angeles population, just 4 percent of the time.

Violence and aggression are indeed a staple within the Negro community.

And in a rather perverse way, it is justified by the white comunity (particularly liberals) who see it as a form of population control (Negro on Negro violence) and a form of absolution of "white guilt"... such as the virtual blackout on the Newsome/Christian slaughterings.

I say "white guilt", because this is one weakness that truly besets us as European-Americans: a near complete lack of solidarity when it comes to answering the near-universal solidarity of the Negroes (and Latinos, for that matter).

Much as the Japanese are to be forever subjected to Chinese claims of bloodguiltiness for their interventionist wars in Asia, and the Germans who will forever be called to kneel at the altars of guilt for her wars against her neighbours and the atrocities and willful ignorance of the German people toward the Nazi regime and its treatment of Jewry, we European-Americans have been thoroughly snow-jobbed by the mass media and academia into an eternal sense of shame for injustices committed by our long-dead ancestors against the ancestors of others...

... much to the peril of those less able to defend themselves (people in blue states with no ability to possess a CCW, or people in general under the biased "white guilt" informed justice system.

The butchery of Mr. Newsome and Ms. Christian should be a case for reviving the ancient and dreadful practice of hanging, drawing, and quartering, with the quartered carcasses of the guilty sent to the four corners of the town they originate from and their heads mounted in a central, highly trafficked location so that people may fear, and evil be cleansed from the land.

From the FBI: http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2006/victims.html

Racial bias

Among the single-bias hate crime incidents in 2006, there were 5,020 victims of racially motivated hate crime.
* 66.4 percent were victims of an offender’s anti-black bias.
* 21.0 percent were victims of an anti-white bias.
* 4.8 percent were victims of an anti-Asian/Pacific Islander bias.
* 1.5 percent were victims of an anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native bias.
* 6.4 percent were victims of a bias against a group of individuals in which more than one race was represented (anti-multiple races, group).

And when the jury handed down its verdict, and it wasn't the one that most of the black community wasn't satisfied with, they decided to take justice into their own hands, forming lynch mobs that indiscriminately targeted anyone with non-black skin.

The Rodney King race riots of 1992.

So do two wrongs make a right after all?

Because something isn't right means it isn't understandable?

he butchery of Mr. Newsome and Ms. Christian should be a case for reviving the ancient and dreadful practice of hanging, drawing, and quartering, with the quartered carcasses of the guilty sent to the four corners of the town they originate from and their heads mounted in a central, highly trafficked location so that people may fear, and evil be cleansed from the land.

Posted by:seekeronos |

Why bother? You still have lynching to fall back on.

Might some of this "hate" crime against blacks be coming from here?

http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_1_blacks_and_immigration.html

The Latino influx into formerly black-majority urban neighborhoods has sparked deadlier kinds of conflict. While most violent crime in these areas is still black-on-black or Latino-on-Latino, interethnic violence is mounting, and in some locales, much of it—perhaps surprisingly, given high overall black crime rates—is Hispanic-on-black. In the heavily mixed-race community of Harbor Gateway in Los Angeles, for example, Latinos now commit five times more violent crimes against blacks than vice versa. Countywide numbers are just as startling. Though blacks make up just 9 percent of L.A. County’s population, they were the victims of 59 percent of all racially motivated attacks in 2006, while Latinos committed 52 percent of all racially motivated attacks.

"--- Because something isn't right means it isn't understandable? ---"

Absolutely not. There is no place for your destructive "moral relativism" that seeks to redefine justice in terms of skin colour or other politics of identity. Such moral relativism destroyed greater nations and empires than our own.

Just because a verdict is not satisfactory to the community, does not mean that the community has a right to overthrow that verdict, and worse, exact vengeance on innocent people not even connected to the original offense.

As for Hanging, Drawing, and Quartering (after a guilt conviction by a legitimate jury trial) would be a far more spectacular way of exercising the state's franchise of the death penalty as an executor of public vengeance against the guilty. Indeed, both Negro, Latino, and European-American alike would be greatly afraid of engaging in wanton murderous violence if they knew that they were risking their own lives - being torn asunder in public - as the price of their wickedness.

Lynchings very often have functioned on a presumption of guilt, or worse, outright murder of innocent life without any relation to any real offense, but rather as simply uncontrolled public violence.

Such was the LA riots: an unrestricted orgy of violence and massacre for no other reason just to do it, because those people then were unable to comport themselves as civilised adults after a jury handed down its verdict.

And if a few cities (Atlanta, Las Vegas, and LA) were set to riot over something as localized as a verdict perceived to be unjust, how much more when the obvious "People's Choice" is denied his "rightful place in the sun" in November?

Not to worry Seek. Obama's going to win in November. So your paranoia about blacks will have to find some other outlet.

You need to work on your code words a little. Your inner hate is getting a trifle close to the surface.

Looks like the troop-supporters are right afeared of teh black folk. They desperately need (and deserve) a black president named Hussein.

Remember heroes, Tim McVeigh was a proud VETERAN and Registered REPUBLICAN.

Thank you for your service, Tim!

Semper Fi. Over and out.

Let us now understand the rage that this poor terrorist felt, prompting him to smash a baby's head against a rock. Understanding will surely stop him from doing more of the same, I'm sure.

http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/charen071808.php3
Smadar wrote later, "I will never forget the joy and the hatred in their voices as they swaggered about hunting for us, firing their guns and throwing grenades." As police began to arrive, Kuntar and the others dragged Danny and 4-year-old Einat down to the beach. With Einat watching, Kuntar shot Danny in the head and then threw his body into the surf. Kuntar then repeatedly smashed Einat's head against a rock with his rifle butt, killing her, too. Yael did not survive the attack either. In an effort to keep the baby from crying and betraying their hiding place, Smadar had accidentally suffocated her.

"-- One of the most disgusting crimes perpetrated by black thugs against white people - virtually ignored by the MSM - because it wasn't white on black. --"

And all this time I assumed it was because it took place in bumblefuck Tennesse. Still, the event seems to have attracted the attention of Bill O'Reily. He commands an audience in the millions. Is he a member of the MSM?

If I remember correctly, this story turned into an absolute feeding frenzy among right-wing bloggers. Malkin, Hannity, Limbaugh, Coulter... the whole pot of right wing media personalities. Are you complaining because you didn't hear about it on 60 Minutes or Dateline? Seriously?

Either the event got covered or it didn't. You can't blame the "MSM" for not covering the story when you heard about it on a Cable News show. That is, by its very definition, the MSM.

Talk about intellectual dishonesty. The cognative dissonance is staggering.

"-- Let us now understand the rage that this poor terrorist felt, prompting him to smash a baby's head against a rock. Understanding will surely stop him from doing more of the same, I'm sure. --"

Oh, and to that, I've got one word for you, Ann.
Haditha.

I'm sure all the liberals will express their deepest "understanding" of McVeigh for his troubled mind caused by his rage at Janet Reno for frying little children.

No, LLama, I didn't hear about it originally on cable. I read about it on Websleuths and other crime blogs. It was their efforts which brought it to light. And, I don't think O'Reilly ever covered it but I rarely watch him so I'm not positive of that. It certainly didn't get the kind of coverage that the Sheppard case or the Jena 6 case got.

Haditha

7 found not guilty or charges dismissed for lack of evidence. One more to go.

"-- It certainly didn't get the kind of coverage that the Sheppard case or the Jena 6 case got. --"

Well yes, and so did the JonBenét Ramsey murder and the Natalee Holloway disappearance. We had a string of media feeding frenzies based on whatever flavor of the month was popular in media-land.

Either way, your story got lots of media coverage from right-wing outlets. Claiming that "the MSM" didn't cover it, when it was a centerpiece on a cable news show, is rather disingenuous. Claiming that "the MSM" didn't cover it, when you get your news from WebSleuths rather than "the MSM" is rather ignorant.

"-- Haditha

7 found not guilty or charges dismissed for lack of evidence. One more to go. --"

Oh, good point. I guess that makes the 19 people killed - including 6 children (4 under the age of 5) and two women - all better. Killing children is only acceptable when you can get a pardon from the military when you're done.

But those evil jihadists... they're nothing like us.

Moe, you're use of the word Haditha shows how desperate you are. You've had your ass kicked to the side of the road, you need to slink on back to your nest.

Oh, and a very nice job fisking that dumb ass known as Moe, Anne.

Gosh, can't we all just live together???

For WPE:

"---
Not to worry Seek. Obama's going to win in November. So your paranoia about blacks will have to find some other outlet.

You need to work on your code words a little. Your inner hate is getting a trifle close to the surface.
---"

Indeed?

I use no "code words". Nor do I generally have any antipathy for anyone on account of their skin colour or other externalities by which we commonly render summary judgments upon others.

Unless of course, you are picking nits over my use of the word "Negro" as a synonym for "African-Americans" as used in the name of the group "United Negro College Fund", or the more verbally cumbersome "people-of-colour". I guess I could have said "Coloured People" as in the usage of the NAACP as well; but this is in keeping with the impressively heavy and odious burden placed by whites upon themselves to be politically correct.

* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - *

Concerning riots:

Unlike some folks whose golden hope rides on one particular Arab-African-American (woohoo-three hyphenated nationalities!) getting into the Oval Office by not only just getting 270+ electoral votes, but by a landslide...

...well, if we have a repeat of 2000 where those 3 electoral votes from somewhere are enough to decide the race, and McCain wins (mind you, not by any devices of Karl Rove this time)... I believe that a widespread insurrection by radicals and Negroes is not an impossibility.

Now if a such a nail-bitingly close race yields us a President-Elect Obama sans the papal cloud of white smoke (though I wouldn't begrudge the then President-Elect a victory "cigarette" for his hard work)...

... I am sure that many of us conservatives and most other people in the mainstream may be disappointed, but I am pretty sure that almost of all us will go to work on Wednesday, 5. Nov. without incident. Some of us may be suffering a light hangover, and others of us will make it a point to get to the Wednesday night prayer meeting to petition the Lord for wisdom and guidance to get us through the next terrible four years of socialism, social engineering, and massive governmental interventionism to come.

"Can't we just all live together?"

Actually, no. A white liberal is the single worst thing on this planet.

"Nor do I generally have any antipathy for anyone on account of their skin colour or other externalities"

You don't "generally" but you leave the door open for "specifically"?

Haditha? Haditha? No s--t, Sherlock?

I have a few words for Moe...221B Baker Street, London. That was a site in another fiction like Haditha. Where is John Murtha when we need him; the game's afoot.

Ah, The Genteel Gentleman. Why, sir, I'm too sooophisticated to be a racist.

It's the general theme of your posts, continually deriding anyone that isn't white. Calling blacks "boy" then claiming you're joking. And showing a complete lack of empathy for anyone that isn't white and christian. You can't even talk about Obama without trying to smear him with your BS innuendo - he's not Arab, he's not Muslim, etc. etc. etc.

The great thing about Shockwave's posts - each new post from him illustrates his ignorance just a bit more.

"--- You don't "generally" but you leave the door open for "specifically"? ---"

Well, I do have a deep dislike for Feline-Americans, and perhaps occasionally for Stupid-People (politically correct: "Common Sense and Logic Impaired Persons"

Stupidity can be cured with great effort; but cats are indeed a blight on our nation.

"--- You can't even talk about Obama without trying to smear him with your BS innuendo - he's not Arab, he's not Muslim, etc. etc. etc. ---"

Well, the Muslim link may be tenuous, but he does have at least two Arabic names: "Barack" (derived from the mythological beast "Bə'raq", which carried the moon-demon idolater Mohammed to "heaven") "Hussein" (a well known Islamic name).

"-- ...well, if we have a repeat of 2000 where those 3 electoral votes from somewhere are enough to decide the race, and McCain wins (mind you, not by any devices of Karl Rove this time)... I believe that a widespread insurrection by radicals and Negroes is not an impossibility. --"

Hey, anything is possible. Obama could win the nomination and black people could STILL riot. There's no guarantee of safety. Who knows? Black people could be just days away from rioting right now. They're like a natural disaster - a hurricane or an earthquake - that sweep up and level an area without any warning. I can just see the President getting up and saying, "No one could have predicted the riots of 2008." And he'd be right. Completely out of the blue.

No racism here, folks. Just stating the facts. Black people are like ninjas. They flip out and kill you, all the time.

"-- Haditha? Haditha? No s--t, Sherlock?

I have a few words for Moe...221B Baker Street, London. That was a site in another fiction like Haditha. Where is John Murtha when we need him; the game's afoot. --"

See, this is the blanket denial I was really waiting for. The real stuff. Complete head in the sand. It takes a real wingnut to tune out literally everything around you, simply plug your ears and claim "It never happened! John Murtha! Nancy Pelosi!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haditha_killings

So much documentation on this incident that its mind-boggling. The military, the administration, the media, all three recognize who got killed and who did the killing. The only legal question was whether the killings were "legal". But it takes a true wingnut to toss all that out the window and claim Haditha was a some sort of urban myth. I mean, wow. That's some hard core denialism. Tighten that tin-foil hat, chef.

Testimony of prosecution witness De La Cruz in Haditha case http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/Blog/DefendOurMarines-DelaCruz-NatHelms.htm

excerpt

According to Dela Cruz, Wuterich gunned down five Iraqi men standing by a white sedan stopped adjacent to the ambush site seconds after the bomb exploded. Dela Cruz testified that Wuterich began shooting the men without provocation after they emerged from his vehicle.

Dela Cruz’s most damaging testimony came when he claimed that a week before the deadly ambush Wuterich told him that his squad should kill everyone in the area if they were ever attacked by a roadside bomb.

During four hours of cross examination by defense attorney Lt. Col. Colby C. Vokey, Dela Cruz was unable to clearly explain his previous testimony. At one point he simply stopped talking and stared into the distance, seemingly at a loss for words. At other times he simply rambled on until he was ordered to quit talking.

Vokey was particularly critical of Dela Cruz’s characterization of the attack on the five Iraqis he claims were standing by a white car that appeared at the ambush site almost simultaneously with the IED explosion. Vokey pointed out that Dela Cruz had offered government prosecutors at least three different versions of what happened during the episode.

What's this, Hillary supporters claim death threats from Obama supporters.

http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/07/16/god-will-guide-the-hand-of-judgment-that-will-strike-you-down/

I would like to say of the whole Obama talking down to Black people and trying to tell n-words how to act.

1) If you think that Jesse Jackson is the voice of Black people then you are obviously not well informed. Jesse Jackson jumps on anything racially charged to stay in the public eye. Its one thing to fight for a valid injustice to be rectified. However, Jesse Jackson has not always used his best judgment as to which battles to fight. You can't run to the aid of those do wrong and only want sympathy and media attention. It makes that person look like a trouble maker, a rebel without a cause, etc. I hope Jesse is taking care of that illegitimate child he fathered (not not by his wife) a few years back during his Rainbow Coalition days, while he attempts to poison the minds of others.

2) Jesse Jackson got nowhere near as far as Barak Obama, during his run for president. Jesse is jealous of Obama's widespread support from all nationalities, period. Barak appeals to the masses, because of his diverse background. Barak comes from a mix of Caucasian and African (not Black, but African) upbringing. Barak has lived in several countries all around the world, so he can understand the views, struggles and situations of other countries. Barak did not come from wealthy parents. Barak has been both poor and rich. Barak came into his own by attending an ivy league university and earning his pay the old fashioned way. Barak is living the American dream. Jesse's views are from a totally different era. Jesse was in his prime during the civil rights struggle. That mentality has served its time, and now its time for change. Barak is the voice of today. Barak can speak on the issues of today, not ride on the coattails of yesteryear.

3) Telling n-words how to act. . . . we here we have an educated man, who happens to be African-American, speaking to those African-Americans, Blacks, or whichever term you chose to describe a person of color with African ancestry about cleaning up their acts and making descent lives for themselves. Barak is not talking to all African-American/ Blacks. He is not addressing the ones who have received higher education and support their families by working 40+ hours and are involved in their children's mental development, family values, and selfworth. Barak, like Bill Cosby, is talking to the niggas. Those who want to leach off the system, and rob, kill, still, manipulate people to giving them something they did not earn nor deserve. Barak is talking to the idiots who run out and have baby after baby, and no plans to work to support their own. As a man of color who has African blood in his veins, he is one of the only ones who can reach out and speak to African-American/ Blacks try to wake those who are still sleeping up. McCain or anyone who is not African-American/ Blacks would not get the same reception as Barak or someone of Barak's status. Its not an elitist attitude that Barak has demonstrated to the public. Its that Barak, like so many others of all walks of life are tired of their own people not taking care of themselves and making life hard for everyone else, because they don't want to deal with reality. The reality is, there will be no social security, so people who are not currently supporting themselves, who actually can work and are in good health, need to get off their sorry asses and get a skill and a job. There will soon be no middle class. There will only be the rich and the poor. Where will that leave those who are already poor? Leeching off the new poor (former middle class), who are already taking a beating with the slumping job market, house market, gas prices, etc.? If we pay into private accounts to supplement our social security, like Bush advised us, then what will the people on welfare do? Will they have to put money into a private account too, or will they continue to drain the economy? Why is it that everyone wants to put down African-America / Black's and say how sorry they all are and how they are useless to society, but when someone tries to get them to straighten up, all or a sudden that person becomes the villan? The only people who get angry are the true n-words (this goes for all nationalities). What people don't understand, like the mind set of the civil rights movement, the n-word has changed its meaning as well. A n-word is an ignorant person, not a person of color as it once was. A n-word can be any color. Its just a word. Yes, it has a history of pain, and racism, but we must get over it and move on. Its good to remember history, but you don't have to keep repeating it, because of the color of your skin or past experiences of our ancestors (goes for all nationalities).

Not since Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. has their been a man who is African-America / Black to have the ear of so many, without raising his voice, speaking in rhymes, trying to fit in with everyone just to be accepted, yet remain positive without putting blame on other races for the damage to the African-America / Black culture. I for one am very please with Barak's vision for America. I think it is time for the mud slinging to stop, and for people to start looking and listening to a person because of the content of their character and not the color of ones skin.

Moe say:
"So much documentation on this incident that its mind-boggling. The military, the administration, the media, all three recognize who got killed and who did the killing. The only legal question was whether the killings were "legal". But it takes a true wingnut to toss all that out the window and claim Haditha was a some sort of urban myth. I mean, wow. That's some hard core denialism. Tighten that tin-foil hat, chef."

Of course I was talking about the accusation that Marines murdered "innocent" civilians, not that no one was killed in Haditha. That accusation is the fictional part (and Moe knows it but he can't seem to help being dishonest).

Notice that Moe the Terrible (compare with Ivan the Terrible at your nearest Russian History store) talks about "documentation" not evidence. Evidence must be shown in a court and found to be true. Any moron can create "documentation".

Moe, not one service person, called cold-blooded murderers by that noted jurist John "Not now" Murtha, has yet been convicted (except by you and some in the far-left media) of any wrong-doing in the battle in Haditha. Is this incorrect? And, Moe, you know this and none of your hyperbolically driven emotional rants can change it.

Ah the clarity of the battlefield among those who never experienced combat....one suspects some have never as much as been in a fist fight. But John Murtha, Perky Katie and Professor Ponytail scream REDRUM!! and thus it must be so...... Murtha at least should know better even though shooting at the little people of the emerald forest is a wee bit different than urban warfare. "OK, I've just seen my best friend seperated at the navel...stop, review ROE....Are the men crouching behind the car over there nefarious or just as fucking scared as I? Now, the guy who just ran into that house..Was it an RPG or a length of plumbing pipe? Dammit, I need to call someone who can tell me what to do next..." Seems so easy to do the right thing one wonders why we have terms like "heat of battle" and "fog of war". Just take your time and be sure it's not a kid with a toy gun. Because Americans don't know the difference between survival instinct and deliberate murder. Silly little Americans.

What's the name of the book about the soldiers in Afghanistan who didn't kill the sheepherders, who then told the Taliban about the soldiers, who then killed the soldiers, whose bodies were being retrieved by soldiers who were then also killed? There was one survivor. He wrote the book.

It's war, not a game of tiddley-winks. The civilian deaths (Haditha) are the responsibility of the terrorists who set off the bomb and who fired at the soldiers from a house and who came out of the house holding the baby of one of the civilians.

"-- Of course I was talking about the accusation that Marines murdered "innocent" civilians, not that no one was killed in Haditha. That accusation is the fictional part (and Moe knows it but he can't seem to help being dishonest). --"

Oh ho ho! So now you're claiming that Haditha happened, but no one was killed? Or are you claiming that the children ages 8 and under were all super secret terrorist killers and their murders were entirely justified?

Come on, Fred. You can do better than this. Maybe you've got a link showing how the bodies turned up in the rubble weren't really children at all, but clever forgeries of children.

Either way, a military court overseen by Bush Admin flunkies and ideologies that fail to convict the seven Haditha killers for murder doesn't exactly acquit them of anything. They attacked and children died. The people they killed were marked off as acceptable casualties, and the soldiers were forgiven for their actions.

They were soldiers on a combat mission, which gives them a little leeway when civilian casualties start racking up. But to claim that civilians weren't killed is still the height of delusion, even for you Fred.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad