« Wow, Very Cool | Main | NAFTA Dust up: Do You Want The Facts, Or The Narrative? »

Thursday, March 06, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e550a2910e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Deep Is The Democrat Party's Racism?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Wow. Dread Scott? Could you aim a little more modern? Like, I don't know... Gerry Studds territory? "Southern White Democrats in the 1800s didn't like black people! So don't vote for Barack Obama!"

I honestly don't know who your target audience is with this level of ignorance, but... damn. I give it ten years before Republicans start posting "LBJ was a fiscal conservative!" t-shirts next to their "MLK was a Republican!" nonsense.

The Southern Strategy - google it if you don't know what it is - was owned lock, stock and barrel by the Republicans. They even apologized for it.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman apologized to one of the nation's largest black civil rights groups Thursday, saying Republicans had not done enough to court blacks in the past and had exploited racial strife to court white voters, particularly in the South.

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question. In their book “The End of Southern Exceptionalism,” Richard Johnston of the University of Pennsylvania and Byron Shafer of the University of Wisconsin argue that the shift in the South from Democratic to Republican was overwhelmingly a question not of race but of economic growth.

In the postwar era, they note, the South transformed itself from a backward region to an engine of the national economy, giving rise to a sizable new wealthy suburban class.

This class, not surprisingly, began to vote for the party that best represented its economic interests: the G.O.P. Working-class whites, however — and here’s the surprise — even those in areas with large black populations, stayed loyal to the Democrats. (This was true until the 90s, when the nation as a whole turned rightward in Congressional voting.)

I'll take the word of the head of the Republican Party - you know, the guys that ran the Southern Strategy - over the musings of a couple academics.

Anyone that thinks the Republicans didn't consciously pursue a strategy to appeal to racial fears wasn't paying very close attention.

Ah, but if the linguist Noam Chomsky wrote something challenging the Republicans what then?

Ah, but if the head of the Republican Party admitted they employed a racist strategy in the South, what then. Oh, wait, that's what happened. No hypotheticals involved.

Yes, it's amazing how the party of Lincoln is now the party of Macaca and that tortured old man who voted against the MLK holiday. At least you have many stunning victories in Iraq!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad