In an exclusive interview with Troutnut at Dkos, he suddenly realized he's been watching television in sunglasses for three days and admitted his accusations of a Clinton photo darkening smear on Obama have no merit at all.
Okay, not really - but here's "Troutnut" back on December 23. Consider the source.
So here's what you've got: A baseless, illogical smear with a racially loaded subtext. If you had said something like that as an overzealous cheap shot in the midst of what was otherwise an attempt at a reasoned argument, I wouldn't have TRed you. But your post was nothing but a despicable smear. I consider that TR-worthy. Same goes for the other TR in this thread, "they will take his lunch money," which is one short step away from calling Obama "boy," the kind of thing you might have expected 50 years ago in Alabama but not on dKos. That smear, too, was unaccompanied by any attempt at a reasoned argument.
Those dogs. They have whitened his teeth as well, which also makes the skin look darker. And all this time I thought he was a Laplander.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Tuesday, March 04, 2008 at 10:41 PM
Wow that's quite a list of links to weblogs linking to your frat boy humor.
And gosh, all these comments on your page!
People are clearly hanging on your every word.
A bit of advice - when you want to use someone's words against them, those words have to be incriminating. Troutnut's cited comment is instead well-written and intelligent, which is a lot more than anyone could say about you.
Posted by: jedley | Wednesday, March 05, 2008 at 11:39 AM