Via Drudge - no link: Taking on Bill elevates Obama to the level of a president and marginalizes Hillary, to some extent. And how do the Clinton's respond? Bill should hold his tongue, as some prominent Dems are already suggesting. But can his ego allow that? If he responds that diminishes Hillary, too. That leaves Hillary having to explain why her husband is carrying her water. It's sort of lose, lose. Sweet!
EXCLUSIVE: OBAMA RIPS INTO BILL CLINTON MONDAY DURING ABC INTERVIEW WITH 'GOOD MORNING AMERICA' HOST ROBIN ROBERTS... SAYS HE FEELS LIKE HE RUNNING AGAINST BOTH CLINTONS... Bill 'has taken his advocacy on behalf of his wife to a level that I think is pretty troubling. He continues to make statements that are not supported by the facts. Whether it's about my record of opposition to the war in Iraq or our approach to organizing in Las Vegas. This has become a habit and one of the things that we're gonnna have to do is to directly confront Bill Clinton when he's making statements that are not factually accurate'... DEVELOPING....


I can't wait.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 04:26 PM
It doesn't matter who wins, when the winner is going up against an angry, 80 year old man. Either way, we're taking your guns.
Posted by: BobInStamford | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 05:04 PM
Bob,
You can have my guns as soon has you have cajones large enough to come down here and get them.
Anytime you're ready I am.
Posted by: Aye Chihuahua | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 05:16 PM
It won't be me, patriot. I couldn't care less what you do. You can all shoot each other for all I care.
Posted by: BobInStamford | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 05:54 PM
You're right. It won't be you.
You don't have what it takes.
Posted by: Aye Chihuahua | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 06:24 PM
Yes the Clinton's are playing two on one. Obama has to run against both of them.
Americans love their cars and their guns. Which would they give up first? Neither I suppose.
Posted by: joeb | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 06:25 PM
"You don't have what it takes"
Laughable. What does that mean?
Does playing with your silly little guns make you feel 'tough'? 'Important' perhaps? So impressive. Really.
Posted by: BobInStamford | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Yahoo
Posted by: HillBilly White House 2008 | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 11:13 PM
Bob, does posting obviously outrageously stupid statements stroke your fragile sense of self worth?
Posted by: old trooper | Sunday, January 20, 2008 at 11:54 PM
"Does playing with your silly little guns make you feel 'tough'? 'Important' perhaps?"
Dude is your whole life a cliche? Geeze you're one bumper sticker slogan after another. I guess you aren't old enough to be a "real" hippie, you know, one of those over forty types with a mostly bald head and a pony tail. But I can just see you tooling around in a ten year old volvo covered in "give peace a chance" & "save the garden slug" bumper stickers all over it. Your white boy dready locks flapping in the wind as you motor to the nearest Phish concert. Light another bowl and relax a little cool breeze. Maybe you will come up with a thought that is actually yours instead of parroting MoRon.org for a change.
Posted by: Wahoo Willie Sez: | Monday, January 21, 2008 at 09:03 AM
Boob, now don't be late for work. Don't want you to get in trouble with the boss. I'm counting on your next raise and the Dems raising the cap on Soc Sec taxes to pay for my next rod and reel.
Sweat on my socialist hero. Thank you for your service.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Monday, January 21, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Having meticulously planned their coveted return to the White House for several years now, the Clintons will certainly not exit the scene with grace or dignity. This is the political duo that honed "The Politics Of Personal Destruction" into an artform; and, most certainly will not tolerate, who is in their mind, the "upstart Obama" to derail Hillary's pre-choreographed coronation.
With regards Slick's comments on Obama's Iraq record; and, the draft dodger's false accusation of flip flopping on the Iraq issue against Obama: It was actually Hillary who was the serial flip-flopper on this issue. Obama to his credit, as a matter of conscience, refused to deny American troops the funding for the bullets and equipment that they required to survive in ongoing combat. Hillary, on the other hand, with no such compelling principles, was one of only two U.S. Senators who voted to deny funding for essential equipments for our troops who they had "previously" voted to commit to lethal combat. A despicable breach of trust with the young men and women laying their lives on the line in defense of our Nation. Obama made the classical rookie error of not responding to Slick's false accusation, which he could have easily turned to Hillary's well deserved detriment
Barrack and his supporters best be prepared for the "Political Lynching" that will rival anything previously witnessed in Presidential politics.
Slick and Hilla-the-Hun, the Perpetual Victim, have repeatedly demonstrated a vicious mud-slinger demeanor that is unprecedented whenever their political dynasty has been threatened in the past. Just ask anyone of their innumerable victims.
Greg Neubeck
Posted by: Greg Neubeck | Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at 06:00 PM