Beating Hillary In Three Words

In the final analysis, it may only take three words to defeat Hillary Clinton in any upcoming election. Obama could be much more effective at employing it in the primary, as well.

Bush ... Clinton ... Bush ... ?

h/t Instapundit There's this from Roger Simon, as well. Someone wants to know if Bill did Gina Gershon???? Whoa!

Aside from America's general revulsion at the thought of alternating mini-monarchies, by making Clinton/Bush a sort of continuum of the last twenty-years, you remove Hillary's primary villain on the stump and alleged motivation for running in the first place. Without him, she has nothing special to say.

Comments

[tbv1977]

Shhhh! We need to save this one for the General Election! :) I think we should have an unspoken agreement to let Hillary win the Democratic Nomination, and THEN we can begin unleashing the hounds! That said, I agree with you. This will be a very difficult challenge for her to overcome.

[joeb]

Thanks for bringing this up. I am really glad to see somewhere else is sick of the Bush Clinton Bush monarchy. two terms of Hillary would be 28 years these 2 families have controlled the White House. and 36 if you cound the VP of Bush under Reagan. that is not Democracy. that is oligarchy.

[BobInStamford]

GW Bush is a stammering fool. His 8 years are destined to have an asterisk next to them cautioning that he was a moon elected by rednecks and bible bangers.

Just wait.

[templar knight]

"...he was a moon elected by rednecks and bible bangers."

Obama voted for him, huh, HairyBob? Cause he's one of those bible bangers who believe in Jesus, and Heaven, and everlasting life, and all that. Oh, yeah, and speaking of "moon", I guess that makes you a Kucinich supporting moonbat.

You're a real inspiration to all moonbats everywhere. And the surge has worked. Thank you for your service. And prayers. Amen.

[seekeronos]

Just wait kids - it gets better:

4 years of GHW Bush
8 years of WJ Clinton
8 years of GW Bush
8 years of HR Clinton
8 years of Jeb Bush
8 years of Chelsea Bush, who marries Jenna Bush in a lesbian marriage
8 years of that other Bush daughter
2.2 years of Jeb's crackhead kid
Surrender and dissolution of the Republic to the Red-Chinese led Shanghai Pact in WW3

So that's about 50 years of the Bush-Clinton dynasty before the ChiComs take over sometime in 2042!

Ain't life grand!

[seekeronos]

And don't forget, with that Chelsea-Jenna marriage comes also the unification of the Dems and the GOP as the Democratic-Republican party ruling as a single-party socialist party until the Chinese land in Anaheim (they'll nuke San Fran right out the gate).

[Wahoo Willie Sez:]

Geeze seeker you're sounding a bit like those people who were going to/but did not move from America because thier boy didn't win last time around. We get to correct our mistakes here dude. If we don't like the people we put in, we can replace them. Yeah, sometimes takes a little longer than others but as long as we keep tacking forward it will all turn out. Chill dude.

[Sarnac]

More interestingly, HRC is running based on her co-presidency experience ... WJC is now openly claiming her direct involvement in all his major decision-making.

So either she's already had 8 years experience in presidential decision-making and her running for another 4 (or 8) is in violation of the spirit of the 22nd amendment ...

Or she has no experience in executive decision-making and is really running on WJC's coat-tails (and for his third term, in violation of the spirit of the 22nd amendment).

The 22nd amendment was passed to prevent another FDR unlimited-term problem ... if HRC wins, the next president after her who is not either a Bush or a Clinton will have the moral obligation to pass a new constitutional amendment extending the 22nd to blood-relatives once-removed or twice-removed.

[seekeronos]

Re WWS:

I'm venting. My other comments re: bug out bags and whinging about McCain are mostly just my outward vomiting with rage at my relative powerlessness.

By the time I get home, I'll be in the company of my little one and my dearest, and thinking a bit more rationally. One must think rationally to properly twirl one's young son up in the air safely, and in a manner sure to elicit giggles.

They are the ones who really matter in my life, not the shenanigans of pols I have little or no say anymore in. My guy left the race, and I'll do my best to support the last man standing, although if it is McCain, I'll be very hard tested not to vote (D) out of spite, or for a bonehead like Ron Paul if he runs indy/third party to take the sting out of potentially voting (D) for President for the first time ever.

I do rue the day I pulled the lever for another RP (Perot) in '92. Worst mistake I ever made, though it makes little difference in the big picture.

[Wahoo Willie Sez:]

Seeker, I'm just trying to keep you off the roof. From falling into the abyss of partisanship. Imagine yourself as the right wing equivalent of LameLama and see the error of your ways. As you look at these people we have seeking this office. Can you HONESTLY say you see much difference among them? So it is for you to chose the lesser of weavils and pull that lever for the future. As I said before; We may get close but we will not go over the edge. Look at the dems for instance. If only there had been one WMD in Iraq, a can of CS for example, even boob would've come out of the basement and enlisted to save the world. Forget the parties, vote for whom you think best or who will do the least damage.

[seekeronos]

"--- Imagine yourself as the right wing equivalent of LameLama and see the error of your ways. ---"

Ewww. Now I gotta go clean up after that one. Heh. And thanks for the reminder.

"--- Forget the parties, vote for whom you think best or who will do the least damage. ---"

Indeed, this is the reality we (I) must face. Really, not much different when I had to choose Bush in the 2000 primary.... my habit of poorly picking primary candidates to support, I had supported first Gary Bauer and then Steve Forbes, until he dropped out after Delaware. By the time NY came around in March, choosing between Bush and McCain was relatively easy, although not the choice I wanted to make.

And in the general election against Algore, who would have been certainly far worse, I voted Bush. Although, I can only speculate that 8 years of Gore might have meant Fred or even the Dread Ron Paul being the (R) everyone flocked to this year... but we choose to address our present much more easily than we do speculations of the future.

Romney is less than my ideal, but I think his desire to be re-elected in 2012 as well as a desire to be set apart from BiPartisan John McCain gets my support (especially if Rudy goes off the radar in NY come next Tuesday)

McCain simply gives me no joy. If that is what I have to choose from come November ... I will really need to pray about choosing between him and the known enemies of the Republic who will usher in hard Euro-socialism and a man who will cooperate and collaborate with that enemy, to bring in Euro-socialism in whatever lessened degree:

Will it be more advantageous for us to suffer for four years with a known collaborator (and before someone jumps on me about using that term, I am not suggesting anything as touching his behaviour while in captivity), or for up to eight years under a hostile regime, in hopes that there will be enough blowback from that to create a solid and viable support base for a real conservative?

I'll probably pick the lesser of two weasels... but it still doesn't mean I will be happy about it by any stretch.