While my only direct involvement at Tufts has been recruiting there for a corporation some years back, as a conservative editor of a college publication, I have been through precisely this kind of attack. In my case, for allowing the publication of student opinions in a letters to the editor section - opinions with which the mostly liberal faculty disagreed. Actually, I disagreed with a great many of those opinions, too.
Having read the substantive items on the current controversy at Tuft's, which I'll link as I go, perhaps I can share some perspective, if not actual light - IMO, all is far from lost at Tufts, for now. The fight is far from over, but it has certainly begun. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) has a press release here.
Over twenty years ago, the intimidation this Student Life Committee is attempting to achieve didn't come through an organized committee. That was left to individual professors, some of whom became fond of calling me a Nazi, a racist and, in some cases, even a Republican, from a distance as I made my way through different school buildings and halls. None of those claims were true. Eventually the harassment started to take place in individual classrooms until some fellow students started noting the occurrences and I had to threaten to sue. Ultimately, through mostly a back room deal with the college President and a Dean of Student Life, the thing worked out, ending in re-assignment of the publication's faculty adviser and the completion of my full editorial term. Ironically, the Dean of Student Life was a minority and also very much on my side. Who knows what may have happened had he formed a seemingly non-democratic committee.
At least, that committee linked above does not appear to be democratic. There's nothing to suggest so in its bylaws.
A Committee on Student Life, consisting of five or more members. This Committee shall have concern for student circumstances, activities, and affairs and shall have jurisdiction over those, which are not in the province of any other committee. It shall ensure that the ideals, principles, and ethical values characteristic of academic institutions are maintained. Its responsibilities shall include the following:
Fortunately, it's power seems fairly weak and my first question would be, what supposedly empowers it to dictate editorial policy at Tufts conservative student newspaper: The Primary Source, or any Tuft's publication for that matter? That question stems from reading its conclusions in this short pdf.
Consequence
From now on, all material published in The Primary Source (whether characterized as satirical or otherwise) must be attributed to named author(s) or contributor(s).
Any consequence here, for now, seems to stop at a form of intimidation, not censorship, in essence stripping away the publication's ability to include anything from "the Editors," if you will. That's a convention so commonly accepted, I have a hard time believing any informed regulating body of student publications at Tufts would allow it to stand. And if they don't have such a body, they certainly should.
There's no reason to think a group of mostly associate professors, from Drama and Dance to Child Development and Biology have any special insight into what regulating an allegedly free press demands, student produced, or otherwise, for heaven's sake.
Nor would I suggest, as this Student Life Committee recommends, that any ultimate act of censorship be left solely to a student government through some ad hoc decision involving funding year by year. Seemingly, Tuft's Student Life Committee is very much in need of a life, itself, along with at least a modicum of understanding when it comes to free speech and a free press. Hopefully any pressure they are attempting to exert over students rights to publish viewpoints with which they disagree or, incredibly, in this case, facts they just don't like, will come to naught. Naughty liberal faculties who love to crush dissent are nothing new, but they certainly have come a long way, baby, since the 80's, anyway. Fortunately, now with new media, there are a great many more voices willing to push back.
In my case all the faculty accomplished was making me a more dedicated conservative who started voting Republican. That wasn't the case so much before the whole thing started. It opened my eyes to the real danger from the Left.
Recommendation
We ask that student governance consider the behavior of student groups in future decisions concerning recognition and funding.
via Michelle Malkin:
The president of Tufts is Lawrence Bacow. Send him a message here.