« A Key Iowa Endorsement? | Main | Huck: The Real Beverly Hillbilly? »

Monday, December 17, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e54fbb14fb8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Politics: Dumb, Disgusting And Dumber:

» Riehl World View: Politics: Dumb, Disgusting And Dumber from ConservativeKicks.com
You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from ConservativeKicks.com [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Anybody know McCain's take on the 2nd Amendment? If we get a Dem president or anti-gun president and Dem congress I'm afraid they would roll back all of the progress made in self-defense in last several years. See NYT today for some fresh propaganda:

"Likewise, when the justices finish diagramming the Second Amendment, they should end up with something that expresses a causal link, like: “Because a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” In other words, the amendment is really about protecting militias, notwithstanding the originalist arguments to the contrary."

Along these lines, Dan, I just ran into something I hadn't known before. The Compact Oxford English Dictionary on the Net gives the second meaning of the word "militia" as follows: "a rebel force opposing a regular army". IF this were a second meaning in the time of the founders, the 2nd Amendment could be read this way: A well regulated force to oppose the regular army being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The founders were very worried about the government going haywire. Nowadays we seem to find it almost unthinkable, we support our troops, etc.

I wonder if any of your readers are familiar with this definition or argument?

Well, I guess it's all over. Andrew Sullivan just endorsed Ron Paul on the Republican side. He, of course, still favors Obama on the Democratic side, and presumably in the general election....but who knows. If one of the other candidates comes out of the closet, he would probably switch sides.

Wow. Wait until Fred gets up from his mid-morning nap and finds out that he is the King of Iowa! BIG party tonight at 5 at the Red Lobster!!

I want Fred to win-but I do wonder if McCain might announce Lieberman as his VP. It would take a lot of the Dem vote away from Hillary.

Man, remember back in the day when it was all about Rudy! Rudy! Rudy! 9/11! Rudy? What ever happened to that? When did the Republicans need to resort to tail-chasing all their 2nd tier candidates?

The 'Urban Legend' has been outed as a phony fetus-hater. His trashy 'wife' doesn't help either.

Islamo, the wicked witch is faltering as well, what's the latest on the 'Breck Boy' and the 'Madrassa Babe'? Have any more fat, black women endorsed the stealth Muslim? People want to know these things, man.

"--- Wow. Wait until Fred gets up from his mid-morning nap and finds out that he is the King of Iowa! BIG party tonight at 5 at the Red Lobster!! ---"

Ordinarily, Chris/Bob is about as funny as a herniated disk. But I had to chuckle at that line about "waking up and finding out he's the King of Iowa".

Much, too much stock placed in this one state. I was honestly expecting Rep. King to give his blessing to Mitt.

I hope that the Fred! can pull off a miracle.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad

2006 Weblog Awards