Simply reading the headline and kicker for the latest Zogby poll should tell you it's a bit of a farce, pumping up Hillary when the facts don't support it. It's accurate enough, but is it "true?"
Zogby Poll: 52% Support U.S. Military Strike Against Iran
Most see Clinton as the presidential candidate best equipped to deal with Iran, followed by Giuliani and McCain—but many express uncertainty
Define most. Given that it's still primary season and the lines between Democrats and Republicans are fairly well drawn between confrontation and appeasement, if anything the 52% number above suggests an edge for Republicans across a divided and ultimately undecided electorate. Below is the key graph.
When asked which presidential candidate would be best equipped to deal with Iran – regardless of whether or not they expected the U.S. to attack Iran – 21% would most like to see New York U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton leading the country, while 15% would prefer former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani and 14% would want Arizona U.S. Sen. John McCain in charge. Another 10% said Illinois Sen. Barack Obama would be best equipped to deal with Iran, while Republican Fred Thompson (5%), Democrat John Edwards (4%) and Republican Mitt Romney (3%) were less likely to be viewed as the best leaders to help the U.S. deal with Iran. The telephone poll of 1,028 likely voters nationwide was conducted Oct. 24-27, 2007 and carries a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points.
Support for Hillary, Obama and Edwards equals 35%. Support for the Republican alternatives equals 37%. That leaves 28% undecided but the 52% Iran-related number suggests a slight lean toward confrontation, or the Republican line on Iran.
In short, post-primaries, 2008 is a horse race with a slight advantage going to the GOP. After all, 52 - 48 would be a fairly decent win in the Presidential stakes, wouldn't it? While accurate, the notion that most Americans see Hillary as the answer given where things stand right now is just a Zogby invention to give Hillary a little more buzz. And given her significant national presence over years, frankly, any broad support simply isn't there.