Nutroots: Feel The Power!!
If you look over DailyKos, he's a "snot-nosed brat" who had his clock cleaned on the talk circuit and simply a shill for the Bushitler regime. HuffPo hints that perhaps Dark Lord Dick Darth Cheney might actually be pulling his strings. While at Talk Left he's seen as mostly just a liar.
Meanwhile, the man in question, Michael O'Hanlon, has been named as a foreign policy adviser to the Clinton campaign.
Who owns your party now, baby? heh


The Talk Left link is to Google:Talk Left.
Is that what you wanted?
Posted by: M. Simon | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 01:57 PM
Yeah - a quick scan of the searched links provides more documentation than any single link. Thanks.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 01:59 PM
No, no, no... it's "Darth Rove." Cheney's a mere Boba Fett clone.
Posted by: TC@LeatherPenguin | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 02:17 PM
OK you did want the Google link.
It makes it hard to find the article you refer to.
Posted by: M. Simon | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 02:33 PM
In fact I'm still trying to find the HuffPo piece you refer to.
If you are going to use the Google bit at least give the title that Google turns up so we can easily see what you are talking about.
Posted by: M. Simon | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 02:36 PM
By the way, I'm not saying that Cheney is behind the O'Hanlon/Pollack op ed piece in the same way they were behind leaking pro-war material to the Times. Just that he's making the same claim - see, some liberals see our point now.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-durang/war-correspondent-respond_b_58769.html?view=screen
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 02:42 PM
P.W.N.3.D.
Posted by: Jeffersonian | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 03:01 PM
is it me or is Hillary doing her "Sister Souljah moments" in smaller quieter bites that one might describe as "Sister Souljah seconds?"
looks like it.
Posted by: mike d | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 03:38 PM
Hillary's not stupid. The nutroots will be an embarrassment in the general campaign. She's heading up the most formidable money-raising machine in politics - she doesn't need or want them.
Posted by: Eric | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 05:23 PM
This has all been part of Hilldabeasts master plan. She has held back from being pinned to a position on the war until she knew which way it was going to go. Now that we are starting to make progress her machine will claim it is because of Dem leadership that we changed to a winning plan. This will allow her to reap the benifits of Bush's long haul without any risks to her. It also will allow the Dems to be seen as strong on dealing with the Arab world. She hopes to shake off the Carter stigma.
Weep nutroots you have been played for fools by Hillda, she plans to keep troops in Iraq until atleast 2013. How does it feel to be kicked in the teeth?
Posted by: southdakotaboy | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 09:18 PM
Yes the unfunny anti-Catholic theatre director; has credibility to critique O' Hanlon; why exactly. O'Hanlon was one of those who in the
90s, stated the US Army was too large; a more
respectable version of CAP and frequent Olbergiester Larry Korb
Posted by: narciso | Friday, October 05, 2007 at 09:44 PM
The three things that make the future Clinton44 both a Hsu-in for the presidency, and ultimately, very, very, very dangerous:
1) She's got a more money than the Vatican in her campaign Hsu-box.
2) She's as smart as a whip, and the dead bodies from Clinton42 still haven't been
3) She's 155 pounds (cankles included) of pure, unbridled Luciferian evil.
This could almost be classed as a masterstroke, and a quite frightening display of her campaign machine's ruthlessly cold Machiavellian efficiency. If this is typical of what to expect for the rest of her run, we are certainly doomed to eight years of Clinton, and it may very well be time to revisit the precious metals investments.
With Fred's gaffery, Rudi's dysfunctionality, and Mitt's basic discombobulation... will any of these men as the (R) nominee only be but a lite lunch for Hillary?
Posted by: seekeronos | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 03:10 AM
I do not understand how so many of you can sit there and despair over hillary's Agent Smith-like "inevitability", yet not do anything about it! Haven't you ever played rock-paper-scissors? Ron Paul can beat hillary because she is nothing but an establishment mouthpiece. She wouldn't stand a chance in any debate against him.
I just don't see why so many of you would rather support the establishment... Instead of moaning about hillary, perhaps you should go back and study history. Start with the USS Liberty. Or just sit there and pretend like you have a clue, and shill for hillary in your own way.
Posted by: Iconoclast421 | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 03:26 AM
"she's 155 pounds (cankles included) of pure, unbridled Luciferian evil."
Does your friend Jeeebus know that you talk like that. He got nailed to a couple of pieces of wood for you and this is how your repay him?? Shame, shame - Jeeebus freak!
Posted by: BobInStamford | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 02:50 PM
I think she knows that in the end, the nutroots are not gonna stay home, and they're not gonna vote for a Republican. She's got them right where she wants them, and they're too stupid to see that they're being treated like pawns.
Posted by: Reality Check | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 06:05 PM
"--- Does your friend Jeeebus know that you talk like that. ---"
I didn't say anything that is not true (or at least, would be difficult to refute).
She is about 155 lbs. give or take a half-dozen. And have you seen her calf-to-ankle thickness? Those things are like trees.
As for being Luciferically evil, I think the dark prince and a good two-score of his top lieutenants in the Abyss have tipped their hats in respect of her deep devotion to Evil's cause.
And to be honest, I don't think that this American union will survive her presidency intact as a free nation. It will either fragment and collapse, or it will survive in name only, becoming 100x the police state that the KosKidz ever thought we became under Dubya.
While this will certainly spell a limited civil war as Christians and freedom-loving secularists and non-believers are rounded up for the Endlosung that the liberals have in store for them, let not the KosKidz and their ilk think that they shall escape the same gas ovens and chemical showers that consumed their once fellow Americans, even as they looked on and laughed.
"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." (Revelation 13:16-18)
Note that the word "man" here can also be understood in the gender-neutral sense of a member of mankind, from the Greek root "anthropos"... and the pronoun "his" is "autos", which is also gender-neutral.
Therefore, it is not impossible that the Antichrist - as a political entity seeking to transgress the commandment and seek worship as the Christ... could be a woman.
Posted by: seekeronos | Saturday, October 06, 2007 at 08:47 PM