Classic liberalism allows for the airing of different views, but does today's neo-liberal academic tradition actually hold to that standard? Maybe not so much.
Evan Coyne Maloney's Indoctrinate U takes a look at the topic. The film will be premiering Friday in DC - trailer here.
A recent quote from Maloney on the recent Columbia kerfuffle:
“At the same time that Columbia invited a noted nemesis of America and virulent anti-Semite, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the university cancelled a speaking engagement from Jim Gilchrist, the leader of the Minutemen, a group that seeks to enforce America's borders,” Maloney said.


To say nothing of Columbia University's advocacy of free speech, as exemplified by their BANNING the R.O.T.C. on campus.
Oh, I see, it's perfectly okay for enemies of the United States to be INVITED to speak at Columbia, but Heaven forbid (gosh, am I allowed to say THAT at Columbia?) that representatives of the United States Armed Forces be allowed to speak to students.
Heaven forbid that Columbia University students be given the FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION or the FREEDOM OF CHOICE to be able to decide for themselves if serving (honorably) in the United States Armed Forces is something they wish to do (or not)!
And, if this little exchange between Columbia University President Lee Bollinger and Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was a Presidential Debate, I'd have to give it to Mr. Ahmadinejad. Mr. Bollinger seems to think that by asking a "tough question" and NOT demanding that his "opponent" actually ANSWER THE QUESTION that he, somehow, made president Ahmadinejad look bad, then he doesn't know shit about spin.
The only HINT of disapproval from the audience (to Mr. Ahmadinejad's comments) were in response to his Holocaust "research" statement, and when he announced that Iran had no homosexuals.
What was even more disturbing than Mr. Ahmadinejad's comments, was the applause his comments received - especially in response to his discussion of the Palestinian "problem".
Knowing that this university not only gave a forum to Mr. Ahmadinejad, but that they said that they would also have given a similar forum to Adolf Hitler during World War II is telling of their lack of patriotism (YES, it IS unpatriotic to HOST an enemy of the United States, and to give them a forum from which to spew their vitriol).
Posted by: wardmd | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 03:24 PM
"The only HINT of disapproval from the audience (to Mr. Ahmadinejad's comments) were in response to his Holocaust "research" statement, and when he announced that Iran had no homosexuals."
Something Iran has in common with the US military...
Posted by: TheSpartan | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 04:15 PM
No one is stopping Jim Gilchrist from speaking on campus, Dan. No need to get your panties in a twist. He's welcome to stand on the edge of the property and scream obscenities at passing co-eds, just like the rest of his neo-nazi National Alliance ilk. When Gilchrist starts running a foreign country and the US Vice President goes into rabid, mouth-breathing rants about needing to nuke it, then I'm sure Gilchrist will have a more formal platform open to him.
What's better, of course, is that after all your huffing and hooing about Democrats hating America, here you're supporting a man who's a hair's breath away from calling for open insurrection against the US Government.
''Congress could spur an insurrection from the anti-illegal immigration side if it approves a plan that would legitimize those now in the country illegally. Such a move, he says, would undermine this country's rule of law.
"I'm not going to promote insurrection, but if it happens, it will be on the conscience of the members of Congress who are doing this," he said. "I will not promote violence in resolving this, but I will not stop others who might pursue that."''
Of course, Columbia isn't scheduling David Duke, either. Clearly, the University is unfairly persecuting white supremacists and seditionists. I can see how that gets you.
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 04:18 PM
They won't let the ROTC in because of their "don't ask don't tell" policy but invite a man who executes homosexuals. Can some of you viciously anti military liberals here explain that little "nuance?"
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 04:19 PM
You're full of shit, IslamoLlama. Jim Gilchrist is against ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, just like the VAST MAJORITY of Americans are. We are against Mexicans and others coming to the US illegally, having babies as soon as possible at the taxpayers expense, then living off the fat of the land, something they have not contributed to. The hell with these illegals, I and many others are with Gilchrist on this, and we're sick and tired of paying for foreigners to come here. And STFU about the damn lawn workers and food workers and farm workers, I don't care about that. I'm thinking about the rapes, the murders, the crimes, the drunk drivers killing innocent Americans, etc. I'm thinking about the diseases such as tuberculosis that these people bring with them, spreading their crap to innocent Americans. I tired of lawbreakers running around free killing and maiming, and liberals just ignoring everything by sticking their heads up their asses. And I'm tired of you, Islamofascist, probably an illegal alien yourself.
Posted by: Illegal alien catcher | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 04:53 PM
Hmm...it strikes me as odd that Columbia would invite someone to speak who not only advocates, but participates, in the killing of homosexuals, yet denies free speach to the military, which just has a policy of don't ask, don't tell toward homosexuals. A policy installed by a liberal Democrat, no less.
We can now say liberals are nothing but hypocrites...hypocrites, I tell you. And they prove it every second, every minute, every hour, of every day, of every month, of every year. Disgusting. Disgraceful. Disturbing.
Posted by: templar knight | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 05:00 PM
And demoralizing, distemperate, and demeaning. Just look at the idiocies successful operations in Iraq and Ahmapetooee's making an ass of himself are forcing our regressive friends into writing. This is what is meant by biting themselves in the back of the neck. Mental contortion, distortion, ideological abortion. They are truly losing it.
"The only HINT of disapproval from the audience (to Mr. Ahmadinejad's comments) were in response to his Holocaust "research" statement, and when he announced that Iran had no homosexuals."
Something Iran has in common with the US military..."
"Of course, Columbia isn't scheduling David Duke, either." Well, why not? Columbia wants the studenten to hear all sides, they claim.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 05:14 PM
"Well, why not? Columbia wants the students to hear all sides, they claim."
Touche, Fred, you are rubbing their noses in their hypocrisy. Yes, they want to hear all sides but the conservative side. Imagine that. Hypocrites...hypocrites...hypocrites, that's all they are.
Posted by: templar knight | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 05:24 PM
"We are against Mexicans and others coming to the US illegally, having babies as soon as possible at the taxpayers expense, then living off the fat of the land, something they have not contributed to."
Hey, slow down there Crazy McWingnut. Immigrants have higher employment rates and lower crime rates than their American-born neighbors. They work longer hours, they rack up less debt, and they do a remarkable job paying their taxes (one reason why the IRS is loath to go after them).
The rapists and murderers and drunk drivers you are thinking of are most likely the whitest kids you know. When your own President has tickets for DUI and was a rabid alcoholic and coke fiend, and when your VP goes out hunting with his drunk buddies and shoots them in the face, when your Congressmen pick up hookers and bathroom blow jobs and verbally molest under-aged children, consider your words carefully. This sounds like a case of the pot calling the silverware black.
Posted by: IslamoLlama | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 05:34 PM
"Immigrants have higher employment rates and lower crime rates than their American-born neighbors. They work longer hours, they rack up less debt, and they do a remarkable job paying their taxes (one reason why the IRS is loath to go after them)."
(1)That's because their American-born neighbors have been saturated by labial propaganda from the Dims in Congress and the MSM since birth (but those days are now over; learn to love it).
Besides, islamomoonbeam, you keep saying immigrants. We are talking about illegal immigrants. Don't pretend you don't know the difference, egghead.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 06:05 PM
Flash news reports: labials in meltdown due to Iraq war successes and ruler of Iran appearing as a jackass on a stage at Columbia U.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 06:07 PM
Actually, islamoidiot is very nearly correct because until recently most "hispanic" criminals were lumped in with the whites. So it appears to someone who wants to spout Mikey Moore's manifesto that most criminals are white. The truth is that hispanics actually commit more crime than white and "other races" put together. Of course that's from the DOJ and I'm sure they are shills for Bush until Reno comes back.
Posted by: Wahoo Willie | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 06:11 PM
Now here is where it starts!
http://littledemocrats.net/
Posted by: Wahoo Willie | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 06:28 PM
The fable that universities are tolerant and allow free discussion is perhaps our greatest myth.
Read a little history. Academic freedom applies to academics. They very wisely prefer to be immune from consequence for their views and activities. Who wouldn't?
Academics and universities do not extend that tolerance to others.
Posted by: K | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 06:45 PM
Since the university and college system is so heavily tied up into the Dept. of Education...
Any academic who receives government grants and/or other financing (to include research loans or even back down to their undergrad loans), should have to pledge an oath of loyalty to the United States, and to Constitution, as well as a statement to the effect that they shall teach a curriculum that avoids anti-American propagandizing.
Questioning policy is one thing, but agitating and brainwashing ignorant students into un-American, unpatriotic defeatists or even anti-American jihadists is positively evil and disloyal, and should be punished with every degree of severity meted out to traitors, especially during wartime.
And if that cannot be done, then the entire Dept. of Education should be disbanded: that is, rolled up like the ratty, thread-bare rug that the pet chihuahua keeps urinating on, and discarded with an appropriate level of disgust.
As for Ahmadinejad, whoever in Columbia came up with the bright idea of inviting that foul snake to spread his cancerous lies upon our sacred soil should have had his neck stretched out thoroughly.
Posted by: seekeronos | Tuesday, September 25, 2007 at 09:58 PM
Holy crap, Wahoo, what a find. "Democrats put you on the potty just like Mommy does." Wow.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 06:04 AM
Holy crap, Wahoo, what a find. "Democrats put you on the potty just like Mommy does." Wow.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 06:08 AM
"Democratics wipe the spittle from your mouth and the buggers from your nose just like mommy does." This could turn into a fun game.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 09:17 AM
actual quotes from the actual book:
"democrats make sure everyone goes to school, just like mommy does."
"democrats look after you and make you safe, juts like mommy does".
"democrats make you share your toys, just like mommy does."
"democrats rob your piggy bank while you're asleep and blow it all on nice things for themselves that they won't share with you, just like mommy does."
(ok, i made that last one up.)
Posted by: bloodrage bob | Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 02:54 PM
And from the sequel, coming out (literally) in Nov. 2008:
"Democrats pander to sexual deviants and Islamists, just like Mommy did. Until she got her throat slit for not being able to pay the Jizzya tax, that is."
Posted by: seekeronos | Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 12:32 AM
Dearest Islamollama:
The immigration many of us are so strongly opposed to is ILLEGAL immigration. Following are a few reasons why this is so:
**********************
From the Center for Immigration Studies (these numbers are several years old - with the increased illegal immigration in recent years, the actual numbers can be assumed to be even worse):
-Households headed by illegal aliens imposed more than $26.3 billion in costs on the federal government in 2002 and paid only $16 billion in taxes, creating a net fiscal DEFICIT of almost $10.4 billion, or $2,700 per illegal household.
-Among the largest costs are Medicaid ($2.5 billion); treatment for the uninsured ($2.2 billion); food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches ($1.9 billion); the federal prison and court systems ($1.6 billion); and federal aid to schools ($1.4 billion).
-...nearly two-thirds of illegal aliens lack[] a high school degree...
-On average, the costs that illegal households impose on federal coffers are less than half that of other households, but their tax payments are only one-fourth that of other households.
-Many of the costs associated with illegals are due to their American-born children, who are awarded U.S. citizenship at birth.
-If illegal aliens were given amnesty and began to pay taxes and use services like households headed by legal immigrants with the same education levels, the estimated annual net fiscal deficit would increase from $2,700 per household to nearly $7,700, for a total net cost of $29 billion.
-Costs increase dramatically because unskilled immigrants with legal status -- what most illegal aliens would become -- can access government programs, but still tend to make very modest tax payments.
-Although legalization would increase average tax payments by 77 percent, average costs would rise by 118 percent.
***********
ILLEGALS AND CRIME:
in 2004: "Roughly 17 percent of the prison population at the federal level are illegal aliens. That's a huge number since illegal aliens only account for about 3 percent of the total population." (CIS)
"The U.S. Justice Department estimated that 270,000 illegal immigrants served jail time nationally in 2003. Of those, 108,000 were in California. Some estimates show illegals now make up half of California's prison population, creating a massive criminal subculture that strains state budgets and creates a nightmare for local police forces." (IBD)
"In March 2000, Congress made public Department of Justice statistics showing that, over the previous five years, the INS had released over 35,000 criminal aliens instead of deporting them. Over 11,000 of those released went on to commit serious crimes, over 1,800 of which were violent ones [including 98 homicides, 142 sexual assaults, and 44 kidnappings].
********
If you insist on blathering, please know your subject.
Posted by: dumbblonde | Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 01:04 AM