« Okay, So Fred's In | Main | German Terror Investigation Expands »

Thursday, September 06, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e54ed882b98833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SC 2 Were Carrying Ammunition:

» SC 2 Were Carrying Bullets, Too from Ace of Spades HQ
More questions. If they had ammo, do they have registered guns? If not, why were they carrying bullets?... [Read More]

» Terror in Tampa Update: Ammo Found, Charges Against CAIR? from The Jawa Report
As I've been saying for some time: there is more to this case than is being let on. The first clue was that the FBI seized a computer from the two suspects' apartment. The second clue was when they wanted... [Read More]

» 2007.09.04 Politics and National Defense Roundup from Old War Dogs
Just some quick hits for now. Maybe I'll be up to doing more before too long. Michael Yon: A Marine. A Mentor. A Model Approach. Thompson: I can stop Hillary Clinton Club for Growth gives Fred thumbs up Video: “The [Read More]

» Pipe bomb boys had bullets from Tel-Chai Nation
As the two terror suspects are specially headed back to Florida (via Michelle Malkin), more news turns up that they even had ammunition in their belongings (via Riehl World View): [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I wonder what kind of ammo, and how many rounds. No firearms?

I know this is being pedantic, but was it a box of bullets (the actual projectiles that contain no powder) or a box of cartridges (bullet, powder, case & primer)? The first is only useful if they were planning to use them as projectiles in the pipe bombs. Obviously the second would require a firearm which they shouldn't be able to purchase legally.

What difference does it make if they were carrying bullets? You guys sound as though such an act is illegal. Why should their firearms [if any] be registered? Like anyone else, they should be permitted to carry firearms. And, it's only illegal for them to purchase a firearm [with the possible exception of a handgun] if they are (a) foreigners and (b) attempt to purchase such from an FFL.

Something seems weird about the whole computer thing. Why not ditch the computer as soon as the cop turns on the christmas tree and you know you are being pulled over? Why wait until an officer walks over to the car to ditch it in a way that he can clearly see?

One of those two is a permanent resident. He is allowed to purchase guns and to own ammunition. The other is, as far as I know, here in a student visa. He would be a "non-immigrant alien". A non-immigrant alien may generally not own guns or ammunition UNLESS they have a hunting license.

This seemed like a good reference.

http://www.vrolyk.org/guns/alien-laws.html

The sword of Muhammad and the Quran are the most fatal enemies of civilization, liberty, and the truth which the world has yet known.

-Sir William Muir (1819-1905)

Wasn't Mohamed and one of the roommates the ones caught shooting squirrels in the park? With a pellet gun maybe but they were using a gun.

Things not looking good for the SC2. The convergence of unusual circumstances and now evidence is not pretty.

"And, it's only illegal for them to purchase a firearm [with the possible exception of a handgun] if they are (a) foreigners and (b) attempt to purchase such from an FFL."

Henry -- I suggest rereading 478.32 You are dead wrong.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Infolinks

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Memeorandum

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

Blog Roll

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad

2006 Weblog Awards