Issues And Answers
Mark Steyn seems to have gotten into a dust up with some readers over some criticism of Fred. Frankly, I found the original remark from Fred to be boiler plate stuff, but unnecessary and a bit tired. He needs work on his delivery and his off the cuff remarks seem to be rather un-refined when it comes to speechifying.
Jules weighs in on the new Ken Burns film on WWII.
No surprise here, the New York Times betrayed the US, again. And their public editor admits it. Unfortunately, that doesn't change anything, nor is it likely to change their behavior in the future, so the Times continues to be just a bunch of liberal bias and BS. Where's the news in all that?
if the NYT is so liberal how come they supported the invasion
Posted by: LOL | Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 12:29 PM
To LOL, you should learn if you do not already know what a straw man arguement is because that is what yours is.
The list of anti Bush pro liberal policies that the NY Times is too long to mention but includes a down right orgy of Abu Ghraib stories that they kept on the front pages for over a month.
They published hundreds of positive stories introducing Air America.
They buried the Newark attacks on their Metro section.
Those are only the ones off the top of my head. If you insist on continuing with this nonsense I will comè up with more but more likely we won't see you here again.
Posted by: Mike Volpe | Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 02:55 PM
So we expected Burns to do a better job with WWII than he did with the ACW?
Posted by: Shadow | Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 05:20 PM
Does Fox News have a public editor to criticize its own organization? I guess it never does anything wrong.
Posted by: bbbustard | Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 06:28 PM
It's called an Ombudsman, bbbustard, and yes Fox has one. Search away for your hearts content.
Posted by: Techie | Monday, September 24, 2007 at 12:44 PM