Hillary: It Ain't Chinese Food, Hon!

via Michelle Malkin, the New York Times is reporting that Hillary Clinton plans to refund approximately $850,000 in potentially fraudulent campaign donations linked to the mysterious and apparently melted-down Democrat-donor-ninja warrior, Norman Hsu. Fraudulent campaign donations are not Chinese food, Hillary, they may leave you wanting more, but it's time you took a page from Ronald Reagan and just said No!

I didn't really know Bill Clinton, Hillary ... but you're no Bill Clinton. He might have been able to get away with this and a whole lot more. But, darling, you're busted. It's time to give it up. The American people are onto you. This isn't the first time, after all.

Blame it on the MSG (mostly specious green) content if you want. But you'd better consider a diet of above board contributions to fuel your on going campaign, or you are going to come up short of energy and enthusiasm at the finish line in the big race up ahead.

Comments

[seekeronos]

Calling Mr. Hsu a "ninja" is an insult to all decent ninjas.

Unlike Hsu, a real ninja doesn't get caught.

[chris]

Lame jokes from a lame old man.

[Philip McDaniel]

"Lame jokes from a lame old man."

How about this one? "If the Hsu [shoe] fits you must convict."

[IslamoLlama]

Remind me again how much money Mittens Romney plans to give back from indicted management consultant Alan B Fabian?

http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2007/08/06/daily25.html?jst=pn_pn_lk

I'm just confused as to the line of logic here:
Candidate A finds out she's taken funds from a crook.
Gets put in lime-light. Returns funds to contributors.

Candidate B finds out he's taken funds from a crook.
Goes totally unnoticed. Returns only the $2.3k received from crook himself and keeps change.

Candidate A is bad, because she's a Democrat.

I mean, seriously, why don't you lead off every post with, "I hate Hillary Clinton because she's not in my party. Also, here is something else I hate about her." Otherwise, there's no rhyme or reason to your bitching.

[cheeseball]

How about this...Politicians A thru Z, (mainly Republicans) receive donations to their campaigns from Donor A (as in Abramoff). Dems and the Mainstream Media go crazy, demand hearings and prosecutions!! Heads will Roll!!!

While Candidate C (as in Clinton) recieves $850,000 from Donor H, who just happens to be a wanted felon that skipped the country rather than face a jail sentence. Mainstream Media doesn't ask what Donor H is expecting in return for all that cash, just says "Oh, but she is giving the money back, nothing to look into". That's why we're bitching.

[templar knight]

A logical response from cheeseball, asking why there is a double standard, and no answer from the liberals. Typical.

[evett]

Well, islame-o-llama, according to that "right wing" vessel the Boston Globe, Fabian only contributed 2300 bones...So Mitt should return more because of...why? Guess because when one googles "Alan B. Fabian + Mitt Romney" the first 3 entries are unltramaniacleftwingfreak sites. And we all know THEY provide only the finest "community based reality." What a f*cking moron.

[seekeronos]

Hsu and Hitlary = big, nasty, horribly befanged sea monsters.

Fabian and Mittens = microscopic sea cooties.

Get it?

[templar knight]

The silence of the liberals is deafening. Fricking hypocrites!

[Fred Beloit]

Good job lads, I no longer feel as if I were no longer standing in...the gathering dusk. (Only Bob and Ray fans will have any idea what that means.)

[Fred Beloit]

Sorry, one "no longer" more than necessary reverses the meaning; you know two negatives make a positive. Mistake # 417.