First Neo-Cons, Now Neo-Truthers?

Orwell wrote, "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." Unfortunately, it seems those rough men trouble some so much, they can't sleep. Instead they fret away the hours dreaming up grand conspiracies that said violent men are coming for them.

You read it here first but make no mistake, in a worst case scenario, you will be reading about it even more broadly than one can currently read about how the government planned 9/11.

Just put this story next to this one (on the recent Minot to Barksdale where's my nukes debacle) and there you have it. Bush and the Neo-Cons have no intention of letting go of power. Obviously they've stolen a nuke and re-unleashed Bin Laden just in time to trigger a nuclear strike on American soil by our own government. The sad part of this is that so many idiots on the Left are probably hoping that it happens if for no other reason than to confirm their worst fears re Bush.

Out of this apparent plan, investigative journalist Alex Jones, and others suggest that bin Laden will be used to justify the instigation of a nuclear war against Iran, and a military manipulated context of martial law, toward imposing a New World Order agenda. The North American Union (NAU) agenda of the secretive Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), is reportedly being designed by self-anointed New World Order architects, to be formally triggered off after a catastrophic incident that is to be blamed on the apparent actor, bin Laden.

2nd item:

How does the Air Force “lose” a nuclear weapon? Creative accounting? And why would such an incident be such a big deal (other than the obvious lack of control)?

Yes, dear reader, it’s time to put on the tinfoil hat and visit The Geronimo Manifesto - because there’s a story that made a brief splash a week back, and which (on the face of it) makes very little sense - unless you stop to actually think about it:

Comments

[Cindi]

Well we knew this one was coming, right? Imagine being in the company of such loosers. Party on! Reminds me of the kid in third grade, strange, not quite anti-social at that age but withdrawn enough to invent their own little world. They grow up to write and direct movies such as Columbine and 911. Get the picture?

[seekeronos]

Having been in the USAF once upon a time...

I think that I can safely say that transporting nuclear weapons had a chain of custody that went three miles long and ten miles thick for each weapon that got moved.

That article made it sound like some rogue general or colonel just decided to have a bunch of these weapons put into some travel pods, no hand receipts or the like... and flown up to another base on a lark.

What balderdash... if our security standards for transporting our nukes has slipped so much so as to allow for mistakes of "creative accounting" to go unnoticed like the Truther's article indicates, we are in a world of hurt.

[scarshapedstar]

"The sad part of this is that so many idiots on the Left are probably hoping that it happens if for no other reason than to confirm their worst fears re Bush."

Yawn. There's right-wing op-ed columnists openly praying that somebody nukes a major city (i.e. decadent liberal enclave) so that... they can blame liberals and kill even more liberals.

Nice.

[templar knight]

scar, you are pathetic, along with all your leftist minions. Mentally ill, really, you need to seek help.

[chris]

Cindi is an expert on 'loosers'. What a patriot!

[TheSpartan]

He's not far from wrong Temp, I mean Bill O did advocate the bombing of San Francisco.

[Fred Beloit]

Mr. chrislamerbythedaytamfordmum, good to see you up and about. Your banana diet is the envy of most of us. But one wonders whether the lack of protein may be causing you to be less witty and more petulant than ever.