And guess what? It's the Left's own fault. They championed the break down in societal values along with morals and standards in media, not the Right. But they will never own that, or anything else. Responsibility isn't in the liberal vocabulary today.
What they found was a sort of “Girls Gone Wild” effect in which young girls are succumbing to the pressure of sexualization by posting nude pictures of themselves on the Internet, allowing boyfriends to photograph them in the nude and making their own amateur porn videos.
Must be that post partum aggression thing Jeff's talking about.


Hmm - is that why so many Republicans get caught in such webs, i.e., Vitter, McCain's Florida Chairman, this guy who is the Clark County, IN GOP Chairman? What's their excuse? Or, do you blame their churches? You guys are a hoot!!
Posted by: Bill Adkins | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:13 PM
Yea, Gerry Studds was a real pillar of page porking virtue.
Posted by: Purple Avenger | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:21 PM
Dan:
Seems like you are doing the blogging equivelent of pulling a girls pig tails to get her attention, at least it seems like you are trying to get the attention of Amanda Marcott lately. If I wasn't sure you are gay I might think you had a crush on her.
Posted by: bryce | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:24 PM
Gerry Studds???? Haha. The patriots are digging up 35 year old scandals. hahaha. Teapot Dome! Never forget!! hahahaha!!!!
Posted by: chris | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:28 PM
chris I give you Jim McGreevey.
Posted by: Paul L. | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:37 PM
"I might think you had a crush on her."
I've never met any of the fem bloggers, so that'd be a stretch. Based on pics, Amanda looks attractive enough, and Jill and Lindsay are both pretty good looking, but as we don't jibe thought-wise, age-wise, and for all I know sexual preference-wise, your assumption is a pretty dumb one regarding any of them, frankly.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:42 PM
I see your McGreevy and raise you a Florida Foley
Posted by: Bill Adkins | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 04:45 PM
Don't forget the mayors: Gavin Newsom, Antonio Villaraigosa, Rudy Giuliani (see? Fair and balanced!)--but what's the point? The article is about the pressure on young girls, not pols with adultery issues.
Posted by: Dale Price | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 05:02 PM
"what's the point?" So easy to say "And guess what? It's the Left's own fault. They championed the break down in societal values" -- thnk maybe Gavin Newsom, Antonio Villaraigosa, Rudy Giuliani, Vitter, Foley, Livingston, Gingrich, Hyde, -- oh the list goes on - could have had something to do with it, too? If you buy the original premise as to break down in societal values, anyway. I don't.
Posted by: Bill Adkins | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 06:45 PM
Oh, I absolutely agree that politicians can be bad role models on a whole range of issues. But the article says nothing about politics.
If you buy the original premise as to break down in societal values, anyway. I don't.
Then you live in a much better neighborhood than I do. And apparently the American Psychological Association has some evidence disputing your experience.
Posted by: Dale Price | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 08:37 PM
Dale,
It wasn't the article that was about politics. It was Riehl's statement about this being the Left's fault, which he failed to support with facts. As a result, commenters here are disputing him.
Posted by: Jaxebad | Thursday, August 09, 2007 at 10:22 PM
Jaxebad, what do you have to say about the Left's defense of Clinton: oral connection is not sex?
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Friday, August 10, 2007 at 09:28 AM
There is a big difference between being a hypocrite on vice ... and being a cheerleader for it, as so many on the Left have been.
That is the difference, moonbats.
Posted by: Rich Casebolt | Saturday, August 11, 2007 at 08:04 AM