« This Might Work Out After All | Main | SuaveVets For Truth? »

Friday, July 27, 2007

The Columbia Journalism Review Has Another Problem, Now

I had the misfortune of clicking through to the Columbia Journalism Review via a link at The Weekly Standard. Evidently they don't even know what a milblog is - this blog isn't one, for the record. But looking at another item of theirs, see bottom, they also have another problem, now.

CJR does not examine the complexities and challenges of pseudonymous writing, or the fact that the New Republic has failed to produce any corroboration for Beauchamp's account, or the delicacy of fact-checking spouses of your own employee. Instead, CJR writer Paul McCleary attacks milbloggers for being chickenhawks:

Their target, of course, is Pvt. Scott Thomas Beauchamp, of TNR fame, and he's taking a beating by critics who apparently have nothing better to do than furiously Google his name all night long and troll his MySpace page.

Let's revisit a June piece at CJR by Gal Beckerman discussing Internet disclosure and blogging during the Libby fiasco. It seems, according to CJR, what Beauchamp himself published on the web should be left alone and kept private. In the Libby case, third party letters are fair game, mock away, it would seem. Given the particulars, this goes beyond simple hypocrisy, or a double standard. It's just plain biased.

The lawyers for Scooter Libby made a bizarre argument - at least to my ears - for why the letters attesting to Libby's character, written to the judge in his perjury case, should be kept out of the public eye: "the real possibility that these letters, once released, would be published on the Internet and their authors discussed, even mocked, by bloggers."

Excuse me?! ...

But in the past, in the age before blogs, wouldn't enterprising journalists have gained access to them as well? They might only have had their newspapers as a place to print them, but would that have made for any less "mocking." The only difference is that it would only take place in our heads and at dinner conversations -- and not out in the world for anyone to see. Maybe that's what's so annoying to the likes of Kissinger, et al.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200e3981d2c3f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Columbia Journalism Review Has Another Problem, Now:

» "A New Kind of 'Chickenhawk'" from Ed Driscoll.com
Baldilocks notes that Columbia Journalism Review's Paul McLeary, in his attempt to both defend the New Republic's Scott Thomas Beauchamp and denigrate his attackers (which are now legion) apparently doesn't realize that the word "milblogger" is a port... [Read More]

Comments

Ha, ha, ha - CJR is so out of touch its laughable.

What pantywaists. Embarrassing.

No liberal bias though. Move along. Nothing to see here.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

ad

Blog Ads


Memeorandum

AdSense

Facebook Blog Network

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


  • Wikio - Top Blogs - Politics

Blog Roll

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad