The sad irony is Hillary may be saddled with him as a VP. I can't imagine she'd want Obama, for several reasons, including he may often upstage her. But this from Edwards:
Edwards explained in an interview on MSNBC’s “Hardball” on Tuesday that he did not mean to suggest that less visible candidates should be excluded from the Democratic forums.
Hillary agreed with Edwards, saying “We’ve got to cut the numbers of these, because they are just being trivialized.” Edwards responded “And they’re not serious. They’re not serious,” then walked away.
Who would they be, exactly, if it wasn't about losing the second tier of candidates? A tier which I still maintain Edwards occupies, whether he admits it, or not.
Clearly Edwards was referring to guys like me. I've been running a write in campaign for president for the past 30 years.
Posted by: Purple Avenger | Tuesday, July 17, 2007 at 08:48 PM
I actually agreed with Clinton that they are being trivialized, but I did not agree with Edwards when he said they are not serious. Kucinich and Gravel are serious candidates. Why? Because they have a huge ego. I actually would like to see smaller debate though.
Posted by: Rick | Tuesday, July 17, 2007 at 11:57 PM
PA,
Do you have a petition I can sign to show my support for you? :)
Rick,
I agree. I view those large line-ups as embarrassing, but Kucinich wouldn't dream of being any other place. That little twit is a perfect example of Banty-Rooster complex.
Posted by: Phoenix | Wednesday, July 18, 2007 at 11:02 AM
Aaah, but Hillary is used to working with liars. She and Edwards should get along just fine.
Posted by: joated | Wednesday, July 18, 2007 at 06:19 PM