The Washington Post's Richard Cohen totally mis-characterizes Fred Thompson's NRO piece on gun laws in the wake of the Virginia Tech massacre. Cohen makes it appear as though Thompson was advocating some Wild West approach, allowing anyone and everyone to carry a concealed weapon. Cohen also appears to believe that there can't possibly be anything like a responsible 21 year old in the world today. Unfortunately, maybe that's true in Cohen's view of some liberal utopia, but it still isn't what Thompson suggested.
Cohen: If the university did not prohibit guns, students would have been able "to protect themselves" -- presumably by reaching into their backpacks and gunning down the shooter.
Marshal Dillon begs to differ. He might point out that young people -- especially young men -- sometimes drink too much and have hormonal surges that compare, on a mild day, to Vesuvius on Aug. 24 of the year 79. (Goodbye, Pompeii.) To think that a university president in his or her right mind would permit students to carry guns on campus so stretches the term "right mind" that it loses all meaning.
Here's what Thompson actually wrote. He not only stated that a teacher with a carry permit might have been able to intervene, he also made the case that a 21 year-old able to pass a background check and having gone through some training might have been able to do the same. Actually, even 18 year-olds do it all the time, in Iraq. And liberal illusions to the contrary, rarely with any problems. It's a shame more young people don't appreciate just how little credit liberals give them and that the total lack of expectations from the likes of Cohen may well be the greatest contributor to irresponsible and even criminal acts by young men and women today.
Virginia Tech administrators overrode Virginia state law and threatened to expel or fire anybody who brings a weapon onto campus.
In recent years, however, armed Americans — not on-duty police officers — have successfully prevented a number of attempted mass murders. Evidence from Israel, where many teachers have weapons and have stopped serious terror attacks, has been documented. Supporting, though contrary, evidence from Great Britain, where strict gun controls have led to violent crime rates far higher than ours, is also common knowledge.
So Virginians asked their legislators to change the university's "concealed carry" policy to exempt people 21 years of age or older who have passed background checks and taken training classes. The university, however, lobbied against that bill, and a top administrator subsequently praised the legislature for blocking the measure.
The logic behind this attitude baffles me, but I suspect it has to do with a basic difference in worldviews. Some people think that power should exist only at the top, and everybody else should rely on "the authorities" for protection.