Wanted: New Homeland Security Chief

I figure once Chertoff backed the immigration bill that won't enforce our border, he's no longer qualified to head Homeland Security. So, I nominate Jose Jimenez ... with the Coast Guard, he was always "alert and always guarding the coast!" Ever notice any of it meesing? ; )

Hell ... we'd be better off.

The "tough, strong" enforcement provisions of the amnesty bill forbid an employer to even check if a job applicant is illegal (whoops, there goes any effectiveness of that tough, strong new employee ID card).

Comments

[woodie4827]

The INS REQUIRES employers to verify employment eligibility of new employees within a few days of hire. Employees must have proof of citizenship or the appropriate legal work authorization, if the employee is an alien. The form that must be filled out is called the I-9 form. Employers are cautioned against accepting forged or bogus work documents.
The new law would PROHIBIT employers from checking a person's status? Doesn't this conflict with I-9 requirements? How is an employer supposed to both check employment eligibility and refrain from checking employment eligibility? This is a worse conflict than the requirement that employers keep race/sex affirmative action records on employees, yet forbids employers from requiring employees to give that information (employees are assumed to be giving that information volunantarily, and there is no penalty if a person refuses to give his/her employer that info). The world has gone absolutely crazy.

[templar knight]

No, woodie, the political leaders of the US have gone stark, raving mad. They, the Democrats and Republicans, have lost their minds. I would like to know exactly how much money this bill will cost the taxpayer. I would like to know how many criminals, including rapists, child molesters, and murderers will be allowed into the US when background checks must be performed in 24 hr. Does Mexico have a national database of criminals? Can it be accessed by the US? Or do we have to trust Mexico to do these background checks? This is bad...bad...bad...worse...worse...even worse than I could ever have imagined.

[Purple Avenger]

It used to be you had to prove you were a citizen to get many jobs.

[Phoenix]

I have to ask: Why are employers prohibited from checking status in this new bill? It is lunacy. What a free-for-all for potential terrorists.

I don't get it.

[seekeronos]

Templar, I don't think that there is much stopping the rapists, child molesters, and murderers that are flowing accross the border even now. Mexico is hemmhorraging all of its excess "undesireable" population into the US like a gaggle of hemmhorraging Russian Royals on Coumadin (blood thinner).

This immigration bill is nothing but a farce and a distraction. The borders need to be sealed, sowed (with land mines, machine guns, and artillery positions) and shut down tighter than Ft. Knox; and then we can start by yanking licenses and permits and fining businesses that refuse to refrain from hiring illegal immigrants. Collapse the illegals' reason for being here, and they'll stop trickling in.

Then stop the anchor baby waves (sorry, but the 14th ammendment was only referring to children born in the USA of emancipated slaves) and deal harshly with illegal immigrants who do engage in criminal in our country... as non-citizens, they are not necessarily subject to the same . Not by flooding our already super-saturated prison systems with these MS-13ers and other vicious gangsters, I'm talking public executions for capital crimes, sterilizations or physical castrations for sex offenders, and severe corporal punishment for other crimes prior to "re-patriating" those scum back over the border.

[Althor]

I have been a staunch supporter of President Bush on the War on Terror and the Iraq war, but I have to admit that his judgement has unfortunately been less than stellar on many instances such as his stance on open borders pro-illegal Mexican immigration "amnesty" - which is what the current legislation he and congress are trying to ram down our throats really amount to; his naive belief that "all people want democracy" - proven so wrong by the election of the Hamas terrorists in the Palestinian territories, the increasing popularity of Hezbollah in Lebanon, and by so much of the Islamist extremism going on not only in Muslim countries like Pakistan and Malasya, but surprisingly even in the UK, where Muslims experience far more freedoms and rights than ever they have experienced in the history of their intolerant and barbaric culture; his obtuseness in trying to establish an American-styled democracy in Iraq instead of having placed in power a Mubarak styled
"enlightened despot" strong man after the overthrow of Saddam, who would have kept the Iraqis in line - in a barbaric and savage country that was a powder keg of thousand-year-old tribal and sectarian feuds and hatreds which were only being kept in check by the extreme brutality of the Saddam regime; to his dismal lack of judgement in his appointments to key Administration positions on account of his "cronyism", such as unqualified
"goody-two-shoes" Harriet Miers for Supreme Court Justice, incompetent fumbling Alberto Gonzalez for Attorney General -of the "Bush Mexican Justice Department", and corrupt sell-out U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton - also from the "Bush Mexican Justice Department" - amongst others.

Chertoff is just one more in that line of "appointees". He has amply proven his incompetence in the way the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA responded to the devastation caused by hurricane Katrina and the chaos that ensued, to the alarming lack of cohesiveness between all the agencies under his tutelage, to his dismal failure to secure the sieve that our southern border has become - through which the whole of Mexico is literally spilling-over into our country! So what can you expect of incompetent Chertoff other than to back the "amnesty" plan of his "buddy" Bush?

Chertoff should have been fired long ago, after his failures in handling the aftermath of Katrina!

Need I say more?

Althor

[rwilymz]

Enforcement of immigration laws is the job of the Feds. Passing it down to employers, or school districts, hell, even to state and local governments, is dodging responsibility.

Either pay for it and do it yourself, or don't do it at all. If you *can't* do it, then don't waste the time and my tax dollars dancing around it.

I prefer fines and amnesty for legitimate working illegals than the mealy-mouthed posturing that both of the entrenched partisan fops have been engaged since roughly ... ever.

[Althor]

Quote: "I prefer fines and amnesty for legitimate working illegals than the mealy-mouthed posturing that both of the entrenched partisan fops have been engaged since roughly ... ever."

Posted by: rwilymz | Thursday, June 07, 2007 at 01:42 PM

And I suppose along with the "fines and amnesty" you also prefer 50 million illegal Mexicans (the 12 million here now and their extended families) invading us and taking over our country, right???

Why don't we just slap a "sombrero" on a bust of JFK, and instead of a "chicken in every pot" and a "car in every garage" we just have a "taco stand on every corner" and a "burro in every garage"?!?! Isn't that the way things will go any way? After all, just stand at a corner in any so called "sanctuary" city in America - even with just the present 12 million illegal aliens - and you'd swear you are no longer in America, but in Tegucigalpa!

Welcome to the "Third World" America!!!

Althor

[rwilymz]

"I suppose along with the "fines and amnesty" you also prefer 50 million illegal Mexicans ..."

You got something against Mexicans? And please don't go sobbing that "they stealing our jobs", because the ones who come here to work are those who do manual grunt work. And if they took your job, then you're uneducated and underemployed, and wasting your time on a blog bitching about people taking your job isn't taking that job *back*, nor is it getting yourself an education so you can get a better job.

"just have a "taco stand on every corner""

Already have one, hombrito. Check the fast fooderies.

Here's a bit of historical compare-n-contrast for you to chew on: why did England become such a major force in the world for so long, able to go into far-off places and merge and mingle?

Because they adopted local customs and allowed locals to participate.

Why has France become largely irrelevant as a major world power?

Because they are rigidly drawing lines around everything French and keeping out the riff-raff of "chocolate chip cookie".

Allowing Mexicans in is not the same as ceding national identity to them ... unless we allow it.

Reality: we aren't going to keep Mexicans out, so quit living that fantasy.

Reality: if our internal political structure is so inherently unstable as to not be able to withstand a 15% surge in immigrant population a mere century after withstanding a 100% surge in immigrants, then we're doomed anyway.

If you want to make English the official language, go ahead; the more uniformity between new arrivals and old-timers, the better our nation can tolerate new arrivals.

If, though, you want to worry and fret on the edges over policies that cannot work in the first place, and which only succeed in demonstrating that NO ONE has a clue on how to make a practical policy, then frankly your best bet will be to move to Guadalahara and run a taxi for the tourists getting off the cruise ships, because pre-failed policies aren't going to work.

Comprende, mi amigo?

[Althor]

Quote: "You got something against Mexicans? And please don't go sobbing that 'they stealing our jobs', because the ones who come here to work are those who do manual grunt work. And if they took your job, then you're uneducated and underemployed, and wasting your time on a blog bitching about people taking your job isn't taking that job *back*, nor is it getting yourself an education so you can get a better job...'just have a taco stand on every corner'
Already have one, hombrito. Check the fast fooderies...Comprende, mi amigo?"

Posted by: rwilymz | Friday, June 08, 2007 at 09:30 AM
-

Rwilymz, for someone so obviously "educated" that he does not need to compete for work with the poor, downtrodden, illiterate Mexican peasants flooding our country to do the "menial" work "we Americans are unwilling to do", and someone so apparently sympathetic to and well versed in Mexican culture, you should at least know that it is written "hombrecito" (little man) and not "hombrito" (small shoulder? Hombro = shoulder).

Yes I "comprende", and no I am not your "amigo."

Unlike many of you “affectated” pro-unfettered illegal (mostly Mexican) immigration proponents, I happen to be of truly "Hispanic" (as from Spain) descent. All my great-grandparents, both on my father's as well as my mother's side of the family, hailed from Spain - and no, they did not sneak across the southern border, but came here LEGALLY.

In contrast to you Rwilymz, tossing a few Spanish words facetiously here and there in your comments trying to be cute, I do speak, read, and write fluent "Castillian" correctly - unlike many of the uncouth present day Aztecs and other indigenous Mexican half-breeds invading us, who barely know how to speak Spanish correctly and use a hardly recognizable “pidgin” dialect of butchered Spanish and Nahuatl (the Aztec tongue - in case that in your ignorance you may not know) that sometimes I almost need an anthropologist to translate!

Do I have something against Mexicans? Yes I do - and mind you that I have family relations who are Mexican and or of Mexican descent, so stick your “racism” arguments up where your proctologist examines you.

First, unlike other nations and people who have fought wars of independence and risen against oppression and tyranny, Mexico conveniently took advantage of Napoleon’s invasion of Spain and the subsequent abdication of King Ferdinand VII in 1808, to depose the Spanish Viceroy in New Spain (Mexico) and declare its independence from Spain, for no greater liberty-loving, democratic, altruistic motives than that of the oligarchy of “Terratenientes” and “Hacendados” landowners shirking off the “Quinto del Rey” or “Royal Fifth” 20% tax that they had to pay the Spanish crown yearly - so much for their “Heroic War of Independence” and being the first to break away from Spain during a time of crisis and while other Spanish colonies, though shaken by the tumultuous events, remained loyal to Spain!

It is an unmitigated embarrassment and a source of much national shame for Mexico, that having been a self-governing “Republic” for nearly 200 years, and much longer than most countries in the world have been nations, that it would still be mired in so much two hundred-year-old “colonialist prejudice and baggage” -“Cien Años De Soledad” as Colombian literary Nobel Laureate García Márquez would call it - and have nothing to show for it but an endless list of petty despots, dictators, revolutions and uprisings, leaving in their wake the enduring legacy of endemic poverty, ignorance, illiteracy, and “institutionalized” corruption that persists to this day!

In comparison look at Germany for instance, not only did it become a unified nation in 1871, sixty one years after Mexico declared its independence, but it became the most sophisticated, cultured, and technologically advanced nation in the world in the early 1900's, fought two World Wars, lost them amidst much destruction and devastation, was partitioned by Stalin and the communists, and yet it has not only become unified again after the fall of the Soviet Union, but has risen time and again from the ashes, and is now one of the most affluent, influential, and prosperous nations not only in Europe, but in all the world, a veritable powerhouse of technology and industry, and you don’t see Germans sneaking across the Rhine, emigrating en masse like the swarms of Mexicans pouring across the Rio Grande like a plague of “cucarachas” infecting our land!

The one time that Mexico had the opportunity to have become a great “Empire” welcomed amongst the civilized nations of the world, to take its place amongst the great Constitutional Monarchies of the world, and become a cultured and cosmopolitan nation under the reign of Archduke Maximilian Von Habsburg - a progressive and democratically minded “enlightened tyrant” - resented half-breed indian Benito Juárez, could not see to setting aside his deep-seated resentments and hatred of the “white Europeans” to have become the indigenous “Disraeli” of Mexico at Maximilian’s request of his becoming his Prime Minister for the sake of national reconciliation and the good of Mexico, but persisted in his uncompromising rebelliousness and defiance, no doubt with a mind-set and “hubris” much like that of Satan in Milton’s “Paradise Lost” that “it is better to reign in hell than serve in heaven”...and the Mexicans have been living in hell ever since!

Ironically enough, Juárez, the “Great Statesman” whom many a Mexican compare in “moral stature” to our Abraham Lincoln, eventually would not yield the reigns of power at the end of his many-times-extended term as “Presidente de La Republica,” became in practice but another Mexican dictator, and would have been ousted by the revolt of Porfirio Díaz, had he not providentially enough died of natural causes before Díaz could oust him. Who knows, had fate and his natural death had not intervened, if Juárez would not have ran the same fate of being shot in front of a firing squad by Porfirio Díaz, much as he, Juárez, had Emperor Maximilian - who could have fled yet was willing to die for what he believed in -mercilessly shot!

Secondly, most of the Mexicans literally invading us, unlike other waves of immigrants of the past, have no intention or desire to “assimilate” into American culture, but are intent on “Reconquista,” or the taking back of the American Southwest, and feel “entitled” to just walk over our borders and make demands upon the American people with insolent impunity.

For all your bravado about getting an education and letting the “chocolate chip cookie” (your words not mine) “slaves” do the menial jobs as a solution, all these illegal Mexican aliens are in fact indeed taking away our jobs!

How can an American landscaper paying his “American” workers $18.00 an hour ever hope to compete with his shady unscrupulous rival employing illegal Mexicans at $6.00 an hour???

Or for that matter, how can an elderly couple on a fixed income hope to afford a one bedroom apartment, with prices outrageously “inflated” by the artificial demand created for said apartment by twenty illegal Mexican aliens willing to share the apartment in unbelievably crowded and unsanitary conditions - to many of them an improvement over the dirt floors on which they slept at home in Mexico, having to drink from, and bathe, in the same polluted streams they defecated in - who are willing to pay through the roof for said apartment to unscrupulous landlords, who look the other way???

The reason that there are already “taco stands on every corner” is because of the damned 12 million illegals, mostly from Mexico and Central America, amongst us - and you would do well, the closer those taco stands be to the border, to make sure it is “beef” they use in their confections, and not some more “exotic” critter!

As for your fallacious argument in support of the “browning” of America by citing France as an example, the reason that France has become largely irrelevant as a major world power, is not their unwillingness to integrate
the “chocolate chip cookies” (again, your words not mine) with 10% of France’s present population being “Muslims” (remember the recent riots and car burnings in “Paristan”?) - not to mention immigrants of other ethnicities and religions, but the fact that for all their “Panache” all the French know how to do best, in spite of their unsufferable arrogance, is to “surrender,” and they have lost every military conflict in which they were not assisted by others (i.e. the U.S. and or Britain) since they were routed - coincidentally enough to our discussion - from Mexico by Benito Juárez and his band of rag-top indians, to their humiliating defeat in WW II by Hitler, who even paraded himself down the Champs-Élysées and had his picture taken at the “Arc de Triomphe” as if but an incidental tourist!

Your saying that the reality is we aren't going to keep Mexicans out and, as you say, “so quit living that fantasy” is the height of cynicism, and highly reminiscent of the arguments made by pro-unfettered Mexican illegal invasion proponents the likes of infamous Jorge Ramos, of Univisión, who when interviewed about the subject has so brazenly condescendingly remarked, with a self-congratulatory smirk of disdain, to our very faces: “There are over twelve million illegal aliens living here already, we are not going anywhere, and America what are you going to do about it, deport them?!?!” smug in the satisfaction that we are but a bunch of spineless pushovers as a nation, and that we will never have the “cojones” - to use the appropriate Spanish term - to simply pack all these illegal aliens on buses and ship them back home, south of the border! You are the one “living the fantasy” - the “Mexican fantasy” that is - not the rest of us.

As for solutions, for the life of me I can’t fathom what is so impractical, immoral, or difficult, in having the Federal Government place an order for a few thousand new “plush,” comfortable, American made buses, with DVD players and air conditioning (just think what a great boom to the economy of the American Mid-west such an order would be!), and give all these illegal aliens a ride back home south of the border, and since we are such a “compassionate” nation we would even provide them with rest stops and meals at McDonald’s along the way
(perhaps we can pick a few more illegal Mexican aliens there from behind the counter at McDonald’s while we are ordering), and even put a couple of hundred dollars in their pockets before shoving them back to the other side of the fence, so as not to send them “destitute” back on their way home. Now, let’s see, $200.00 x 12 millions = $240.00 million. What a bargain! We would get rid of the Mexican “cucaracha” infestation...and much cheaper at that, than if we had hired “Terminex Pest Control”... with Zyklon-B (sorry about the pun, but I simply couldn’t help myself).

Oh, and by the way Rwilymz, for someone who apparently wears a “sombrero,” drinks “Corona Beer” (otherwise known as “Mexican cow piss”), celebrates “Cinco de Mayo,” and enthusiastically waves the flag of our illegal Mexican brethren, you would do well to at least learn how to spell “Guadalajara” correctly - no le parece?

Si fuera usted otro, Rwilymz, le diria que fuera con Dios, más a usted, vaya al carajo, que aqui en los Estados Unidos tal como en la canción de Celia Cruz: "No hay cama pa' tanta gente"!

Althor

[rwilymz]

"not "hombrito" (small shoulder?"

It's the meztizo nahuatl-spanish mishmash you need a translator to fathom, "little buddy" or "dude".

"Unlike many of you "affectated" pro-unfettered illegal (mostly Mexican) immigration proponents..."

You aren't talking about me then. I am hardly in favor of "unfettered illegal immigration."

However, comma, the proposals currently on the table from both the Democrats [and liberals in general] and the Republicans [and conservatives in general] are the quintessence of poliical posturing. Both are guaranteed to do one thing: appeal to their respective bases. Both are similarly guaranteed to **not** do one thing: work.

Which is, frankly, the most appealing thing about the "Bush" proposal. It was neither of the two entrenched stupidities. Don't know that it would work any better, but it wasn't the fuck-witted nonsense by either of the "usual suspects".

"All my great-grandparents... came here LEGALLY."

So did mine. Stand in line.

"In contrast to you Rwilymz, tossing a few Spanish words facetiously here and there in your comments trying to be cute..."

I wasn't trying to be cute. I was trying to be condescending.

"I almost need an anthropologist to translate!"

Ah! Spain and its former colony; two **more** peoples separated by a common tongue.

"Do I have something against Mexicans? Yes I do"

Apparently so do many Americans, which is unfortunate. We are seriously talking about taking one of the two longest unguarded borders in the world and militarizing it, all because we are afraid of their people who want to come here to work rather than their military wanting to come here to take over.

Sad, doncha think?

"unlike other nations and people who have fought wars of independence and risen against oppression and tyranny, Mexico conveniently ..."

Wait. So you're telling me that we, here in the US, who started a Glorious Revolution because we didn't want to pay a stamp tax on imported goods and took advantage of the ongoing hostilities between France and England to cover us are moral ... while the dirty Mexican beaners who took advantage of Spain's ongoing hostilities with France to host a revolution because they didn't want to pay a 20% land tax are scummy, conniving rat-bastards?

How does that work? ...besides only by being a crypto-Spanish colonialist?

"It is an unmitigated embarrassment ..."

Yeah; and lotsa people consider the Republicans an "unmitigated embarrassment", and just as many ditto the Democrats. Waddaya gonna do?

"Ironically enough, Juárez ..."

As in Cuidad Juárez?

"Secondly, most of the Mexicans ... have no intention or desire to assimilate into American culture, ..."

Ah. Finally, we get to some actual meat of an argument rather than a litany of self-involved pouting.

Yes. You're right. A great many of them don't. They've adopted, themselves, the self-centered "me" mentality of America -- which is assimilation in a way, I guess -- and asserted that **we** need to change for **them**.

In short: no. Spanish or English [or your meztizo pidgin mish-mash of Nahuatl], it's the same. You come here, you change.

"For all your bravado about getting an education and letting the "chocolate chip cookie" (your words not mine) "slaves" do the menial jobs as a solution..."

Yes. My words. But thanks for advertising that you're far too indignant about having someone **dare** to contradict you and your petulant screed that you can't read and comprehend what he says.

If you were to have paid attention to more that the buzzing in your ears you'd know that I was veryveryvery clearly referring to the French and their Academe Francais, which has issued peevish declarations [much like yours, here, I might add] against anything non-Froggish. One of the things that they are most notoriously known for obliterating from French Usage is the term "choclate chip cookie". Also "hamburger" and "microchip" and hundreds of other [mostly American] neologisms that are destined to make Frogland into the Land That Time Forgot, here, before too long by their forced exclusion.

And such is the destiny of the US if we are to fail and refuse to keep up with the real world as she is. Part of the real world as she is, is: Mexico doesn't have jobs [even with all the outsourcing we do at them]; we do. We either need to fill those jobs ourselves -- and [re]structure our unemployment rituals such that those jobs are filled by our own idle workers, or we allow more foreigners in to do them. Because they need to be done. Don't really see many more options, though I'm sure there could be.

The rest of your presumed racist nonsense is remanded for rewording, or apology, or both, since it's obvious you were not responding to anything I actually said, but instead things that you invented all by your lonesome. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

"As for your fallacious argument in support of the "browning" of America..."

Oh it was hardly fallacious. Just inconvenient to your position.

"the reason that France has become largely irrelevant as a major world power, is not their unwillingness to integrate the "chocolate chip cookies" (again, your words not mine)..."

And the chocolate chip cookies remaining unintegrated into their language is the policy of the Academe Francais, and not a racist term, you presumptive little shit.

"with 10% of France’s present population being Muslims... all the French know how to do best... is to surrender..."

Right.

Now you're catching on.

It is not that France is insufferably smug or has at once self-referential laws and pious [faux-]egalitarian philosophies, but it's what they do **with** that smugness, self-referentialism and piety. Any huge, traditionally imperial or economic juggernaut of a nation can withstand a huge influx of outsiders, or it can crumble under a trickle. It depends on how it handles it.

England handled it; Rome handled it for centuries and then got lazy and fell to pieces; Byzantium handled it for a while, then got lazy and demanded others handle it for them. France can't handle it; we handled it last century but are falling into a bickering mass of myopic blame-layers this century. Why?

You answered it yourself, back in between your bouts of snivelling self-indulgent chin-quivering pontification: they aren't assimilating.

More to the point: we aren't **requiring** them to assimilate. Why not?

It's rude. And the sanctimonious "enlightenment" of our recent past refuses to acknowledge that some things that are difficult are also beneficial in the long run. For everyone. And thus need to be imposed.

Common language being prime among them. You come here, you learn the language; our job is not to spend billions of dollars a year rewriting every goddammed thing under the sun in a dozen different languages just in case some arrogant immigrant too lazy to fit in wants to know how to apply for unemployment. Or how to get to Pismo Beach. Either learn the language or hire a translator.

"Oh, and by the way Rwilymz, for someone who apparently wears a "sombrero""

Cubs baseball hats or leather cowboy hats. One of which I bought in Mexico. Cozumel. Rogers Boots, actually. "Hecho en Mexico". Also have a few made here, but they're far more expensive.

"drinks "Corona Beer" (otherwise known as "Mexican cow piss")"

Better than Budweiser, otherwise known as American dog piss.

But I prefer Belikan for central american beers. Only because it's not common. And only when I go to Belize. When in Coz I usually get Mexican beer, and not the Coronas. I can buy them here, but don't. If I'm going to buy Mexican beer here it's Negro Modelo.

Yadda yadda on the rest of your extremely presumptive definitions of me. Better luck next time in trying to figure out what you're talking about.

[seed]

Not much on my mind right now. Today was a complete loss. So it goes. I've just been sitting around waiting for something to happen. I've basically been doing nothing , but I guess it doesn't bother me.

[asian parade]

More or less nothing seems important. So it goes. Oh well. It's not important. That's how it is.

[MeCagoEnElTontoPollasAlthor]

JODER, Althor, eres un jilipollas de mierda...te crees espagnol, pero apuesto a que no eres mas que otro indito traidor pasandose por blanco para que le quieran sus idolos americanos rubios.

YO SI SOY ESPAGNOL comunista republicano como mis abuelos que DEBEN SU VIDA A MEXICO que les recibio hospedo y alimento cuando el maldito nazi (como tu) de FRANCO SE ROBO SU PAIS DE LA BANDERA MORADA.

Mi madre todavia es ciudadana espagnola. Yo me crie entre paellas y turrones, cabrito y peladillas, caldos, pero ante todo fabadas y sidra. Si, imbecil, en las Romerias de Covadonga, de las que tu ni siquiera has escuchado hasta los nignos tan chicos como ocho o nueve agnos bebiamos sidra. Todo esto lo he disfrutado GRACIAS A LA COMUNIDAD ASTURIANA EXILIADA Y AL GRAN Y GENEROSO PAIS QUE LE ACOJIO: MEXICO

SOY ASTURIANO, SI, PERO PRIMERO MEXICANO Y A MUCHA HONRA.

tu no eres mas que una mierdita nazi insignificante

[little cock sex]

Buyers of guns must take gun-safety courses

[bangers bus]

Freedom is more important than security

[latina video streaming]

coisa)!!! isso iria me ajudar muito na construcao do meu site...

[gaydome]

Today was a complete loss. I've just been hanging out doing nothing. I've more or less been doing nothing. I can't be bothered with anything recently. I guess it doesn't bother me.