I included the ledes, not that the New York Times is actually trying to send a message, or anything.
In Mostly Sedate Debate, Democrats Show More Unity Than Strife By ADAM NAGOURNEY AND JEFF ZELENY Published: April 27, 2007
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was professorial and emphatic as she spoke Thursday night about health care, Iraq and whether Wal-Mart was good for America (a ''mixed blessing,'' she decided) .
Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, by reputation a dynamic performer, was reserved and cautious as he talked about a donor with a shady past, how he would respond to a terrorist attack on American shores and his biggest mistake (not doing more to stop Congress from intervening in the Terri Schiavo case, he said).
At G.O.P. Debate, Candidates Played to Conservatives By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE Published: May 5, 2007
Thursday night’s debate among 10 Republican presidential candidates encompassed all the usual issues and then some, but some of its most striking moments centered on two topics: abortion and evolution.
I think I'd rather check out Jules post on Islamo-stripping than read the NY Times take on things.
Yawn, so the NYTreason is making shit up again. Pantsuit Lady likes to shop at WalMart but hates the crowds and Osama has an embarrassing donor while back at the Ranch the Repubbies are trying to play nice to their base in hopes that conservatives won't stay home again. Might be more truth to that than anyone wants to admit.
The pearl in the pig mud is the stripping Muslim babes. (Maybe a poor choice of words but I'm not taking it back)
Give me a C130 and a bunch of 2 foot long condoms marked Made in the USA size medium and we can nip this radical Islam thing in the bud right quick.
Posted by: Buzzy | Saturday, May 05, 2007 at 01:48 AM