« Will Republicans Pay For Abandoning Enforcement On Immigration? | Main | Immigration: Bush / Kennedy II »
See Michelle Malkin for background. She's identifying members of the AP Board. Here they are in all their glory. See last pages of this 2004 pdf. Michael Reed is third from the right back row and R. John Mitchell is the fellow in front of him through the gap in the row behind. Michelle does the current Math.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d8352e5a8153ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Lovely Group Of White People:
» GOP-bashing Associated Press goes bean-counting...Now, let's turn the tables on the AP from Michelle Malkin
Associated Press writer Nancy Benac plays the "diversity" card with a piece tallying up how many women and minorities service in power positions for the various presidential candidates. The hit piece slamming Republicans for not promoting enough non-wh... [Read More]
» To Live And Die In AP from Ed Driscoll.com
When you live with an obsession with diversity (as characterized by its modern definition of skin color, not ideas), you die by it as well. Update: 1000 words no longer necessary.... [Read More]
» GOP-bashing Associated Press goes bean-counting... Now, let's turn the tables on the AP from Bill's Bites
GOP-bashing Associated Press goes bean-counting...Now, let's turn the tables on the APBy Michelle Malkin (H/T: Don Surber) Associated Press writer Nancy Benac plays the diversity card with a piece tallying up how many women and minorities service in po... [Read More]
The comments to this entry are closed.
AP showing their backsides again. Gotta love it. Wouldn't it be great if someone bought that organ of propaganda and reformed it? Oh, someone is buying it? Let's see what happens.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 02:48 PM
Exactly. But racism is no longer a social problem...well, if you're conservative it isn't, right?
Posted by: Jimmy | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 03:00 PM
The conservative right is supposed to be the side of the super rich right? Well then why aren't we buying up all these left leaning organizations and firing the lefties?
Posted by: southdakotaboy | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 03:01 PM
Why, James, whatever do you mean? I said they were showing their backsides, didn't I? Actually, though, conservatives are concerned about racism. It is the NAACP that is more concerned about the advancement of Liberals than the advancement of colored people, wouldn't you say?
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 03:10 PM
It could be diverse, right? Slavs, Croats, Dutch, Scots, Brits, and Canadian.
Maybe like the Dumbs and how they told time for the "first 100 hours" of Congress, they see diversity differently than the rest of the sane world.
Posted by: Eddie | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 03:25 PM
Don't you love how liberals are always championing diversity and affirmative action? Of course that's for everyone else, they sure don't want any of those brown people working in the same office as them. What a bunch of sickass racists!
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 03:38 PM
yes that is great to turn the tables on the media. now if we could just get term limits on the media.
As for the AP I trust that organization. I now know why. They are dominated by you know who.
Posted by: nova | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 04:04 PM
Hahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Oh, the beautiful irony of it! The AP is probably calling for diversity in one of their by-lined articles as we speak.
Just more liberal do-as-I-say, not-as-I-do bullshit. Liberals have no shame. None.
Posted by: templar knight | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 04:20 PM
Not unsurprisingly, the AP reporter doesn't seem to realize that "not unsurprisingly" actually means "surprisingly". The ONE thing you would expect a reporter to understand is the English language.
Posted by: DaveS | Thursday, May 17, 2007 at 04:38 PM