The Dog Ate The Imam's Homework

Yeah, right - the dog ate this imam's homework and God said that woman should be killed, not him.

Me: I understand that you called for the murder of Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

ElBayly: Oh no no, that was not correct. (snip) That is the call of God.

So much for accountability.

Alright, come on you Liberal hazmats. Tell me how the Right says God tells them to ban abortion. Because, ... you know, ... there are no moral equivalency issues there.

Comments

[bloodrage bob]

and these are the folks our idiot liberals line up to *defend*. never mind the beaten women; the hanged gays; the conveniently unarmed civilians targeted by the brave muslim warriors; or the ongoing genocide in darfur. despite the fact these things are massive violations of liberal core "principles", (LOL), teacher told them they weren't allowed to criticize non-western cultures/pseudoreligions.

so, being the obedient little automatons they are, too scared to think for themselves, ....they don't.

but hey: maybe i'm wrong. let's see how many firebreathing liberals storm in here to condemn el-bayly for his hate speech. or islam itself for its horrible teachings of hate and intolerance. surely they will come! the defenders of women, gays, the oppressed, truth, justice, high taxes and all that!! right?

the current count is.....um......well, "zero".

but it's early still.

[Saul]

Why not? Allah has been shouldering the blame/taking the credit for everything nasty that ever was done at the hands of a Muslim since the prophet first started his life of plunder.

[evelyn]

Little wonder the usual Lib suspects do not comment here. In point of fact, they and those of their treacherously treasonous ways never comment at the "point blank" posts Dan offers...

[Purple Avenger]

In a time not so long ago, that would have been properly identified as solicitation for murder. Now of course, its just "free speech".

[TheSpartan]

If you think God is talking to you then you're batshit crazy, I don't care what flavor of deity you're referring to.

[templar knight]

There you go, everybody. Spartan stepped forward and condemned the Imam, kinda sorta, in a round about way, by calling all religious people crazy. He just couldn't bring himself to condemn his ally. But he's still twisting around like a pretzel, let's see what he says when he unwinds.

[Kelvin]

Wow, this guy is nutty enough for Bob Jones U.

[Legalize]

"In a time not so long ago, that would have been properly identified as solicitation for murder. Now of course, its just "free speech"."

No. It wouldn't have ever been identified as "solicitation for murder" (a crime I assume the voices in your head invented). But even if you were talking about solicitation to commit murder, the elements of intent and commanded action have not been satisfied. But please, don't let being wholly incorrect stop you from educating the masses. Hell, if we apply your standard, virtually everything Rush Limbaugh, Charles Johnson, and Dan Riehl vomit up would be considered "solicitation."

"Wow, this guy is nutty enough for Bob Jones U."

Don't be silly; Bob Jones is one of the most progressive institutions in the U.S. Why a couple of years ago it even lifted its ban on interracial dating!

[Phoenix]

the elements of intent and commanded action have not been satisfied. But please, don't let being wholly incorrect stop you from educating the masses. Hell, if we apply your standard, virtually everything Rush Limbaugh, Charles Johnson, and Dan Riehl vomit up would be considered "solicitation."

Posted by: Legalize | Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 11:04 AM

~~~~

Legalize,

What about your elements of intent and commanded action here at Riehl World View? Seems to me intimidation, verbal mockery, hate-speech, threats of violence against another, verbal assault are all solicitations of violence. You are guilty of all these crimes against humanity.

How do you answer for that? You offend me, intimidate me, make me feel frightened by your words of hate, and because I am a woman, I feel sexually violated by your crass, threatening, and vulgar speech. This is a public forum and you have made actionable statements that threaten all of us who visit here.

Phoenix

[Scrapiron]

"virtually everything Rush Limbaugh, Charles Johnson, and Dan Riehl vomit up would be considered "solicitation."

I hope Legalize is not in the legal profession at any position above janitor at a law firm. But hey, that's what we see out of the leftie legals today. Lawyers (sic) trying to convince a jury that an apple and orange taste the same. Works on other lefties.

Kind of in line with the statement today that the congress is challenging the president on the WOT. No, the congress is challenging the United States Constitution and in effect destroying it. Soon we will be a country without an effective constitution, or the next Darfur in the making.

[Legalize]

"I hope Legalize is not in the legal profession at any position above janitor at a law firm."

Wow, what a scathing retort. I can only imagine that you will back up your sophisticated barb with something remarkably pointed and cogent like:

"But hey, that's what we see out of the leftie legals today. Lawyers (sic) trying to convince a jury that an apple and orange taste the same. Works on other lefties."

Oh .... Maybe not.

"Kind of in line with the statement today that the congress is challenging the president on the WOT. No, the congress is challenging the United States Constitution and in effect destroying it. Soon we will be a country without an effective constitution, or the next Darfur in the making."

You see, this is the deranged "reasoning" that the public has finally roundly rejected: The Dem-controlled Congress = Darfur. Brilliant.

Moron.

[bloodrage bob]

how very strange. expecting to see hundreds of furious comments vilifying the shit-for-brains imam and/or his savage little stone-age pseudoreligion, all i note are a couple of (*very*) tepid remarks from the liberals. obviously uncomfortable with criticizing ANYTHING non-western, (teacher DID tell them "never to do that!"), these clowns timidly type in the briefest, and most safely bland "criticisms" imaginable.

one-liners. vague notes that while calling for the murder of a woman who dared to speak the truth about islam is "bad", at least....at least.....at least it's **nothing like the hate speech of the notorious woman-killing rush limbaugh!!!**

what gutless, hypocritical wonders they be, these idiot liberals. in other news, iran's "religion-of-peace" secret police has greeted the arrival of spring by cracking down on hussies who flaunt the rules of allah by looking like....god help us....looking like *women*. from the AP: "...some for wearing too tight an overcoat (!!) or letting too much hair peek out from under their veils, authorities said monday."

300 women - that gender liberals lyingly claim to care about - arrested.

yeah, you're right, "legal": limbaugh is the problem here. what a spineless wonder you are.

[Legalize]

Unhinged Bob, are you too dense or too dishonest to respond to what I actually said about Limabaugh? I suspect a little of both. I didn't compare Limbaugh to the Imam; I said, in response to PA:

"Hell, if we apply your standard [in reference to solicitation to muder], virtually everything Rush Limbaugh, Charles Johnson, and Dan Riehl vomit up would be considered "solicitation.""

I know you chuckle-heads LOVE to misquote me and all, but seriously ....

[bloodrage bob]

wow. took you all of 9 minutes to respond to that, o mighty "lawyer".

not working today? not too much "legal" work to do?

[Legalize]

Oh, the irony, Unhinged Bob. Tell me, is 3 minutes more or less time than 9 minutes? But then again, I don't blame you for grasping at temporal straws when your "substnative" "point" was just obliterated, and you haven't Googled your retort yet. Were you and Hard Right the water-boys for the same pre-school debate team?

[Phoenix]

I know you chuckle-heads LOVE to misquote me and all, but seriously ....

Posted by: Legalize | Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 12:20 PM

I don't. I have all your words quoted verbatim. Seriously.....

Phoenix

[Phoenix]

Legalize,

What about your elements of intent and commanded action here at Riehl World View? Seems to me intimidation, verbal mockery, hate-speech, threats of violence against another, verbal assault are all solicitations of violence. You are guilty of all these crimes against humanity.

How do you answer for that? You offend me, intimidate me, make me feel frightened by your words of hate, and because I am a woman, I feel sexually violated by your crass, threatening, and vulgar speech. This is a public forum and you have made actionable statements that threaten all of us who visit here.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix | Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Legalize,

I asked you a direct question. Answer it, please.

Phoenix

[bloodrage bob]

aaaaand the clock starts ticking, as we all wait transfixed, to see how long it will take the self-proclaimed, curiously not-very-busy "lawyer" to answer a direct question.

9 minutes? 3 minutes? will he/she emulate the actions of the famous gutless liberal 'zifnab' and *never* get around to answering an uncomfortable direct question?

[Kelvin]

bloodrage bob = angry, unemployed loser. Get a job, welfare king!!

[tk]

Legalize, you are truly a lost soul. One person is unhinged, another a moron. You hate everything and everyone.

"You see, this is the deranged "reasoning" that the public has finally roundly rejected: The Dem-controlled Congress = Darfur. Brilliant."

Deranged, not poor or wrong, but deranged. I wonder why you post on this site, does it fill some need?

As for the public ROUNDLY rejecting anything with the change of some 24 congressional seats out of 435 and some 4 senate seats out of 100 is silly.

[Legalize]

"Legalize, you are truly a lost soul. One person is unhinged, another a moron. You hate everything and everyone."

Cry me a river, princess. Look at the site you're on.

"You see, this is the deranged "reasoning" that the public has finally roundly rejected: The Dem-controlled Congress = Darfur. Brilliant."

"Deranged, not poor or wrong, but deranged. I wonder why you post on this site, does it fill some need?"

Yes, inspector. Comparing the Dem contolled Congress to Darfur is patently deranged, fellacious, and simply stupid. There is nothing meritorious, honest, persuasive, or helpful in the comparison. Hence, it is treated with the ridicule it deserves.

"As for the public ROUNDLY rejecting anything with the change of some 24 congressional seats out of 435 and some 4 senate seats out of 100 is silly."

Surreal.

[dorian grey]

Legalize,

Answer one single question. Are you a lawyer or just some liberal trying to get pot legalized???

[tk]

Legalize, Great response; surreal. I admire the range of thought. I'll say it again you are a poor, lost soul.

[dylan]

Phoenix,
Your new-found sensitivity, legal awareness and simulated fear might warrant an answer to your question.
But it won't.
You will get no answer because you are full of it.

[Althor]

Surreal? Talk about substance induced "Alternate Realities", Legalize!

Tk is absolutely right! What is really surreal is for Democrats to have the gall to call a "mandate" winning
"some 24 congressional seats out of 435 and some 4 senate seats out of 100", as Tk says!

Theirs is a "Much Ado About Nothing" hollow victory which they won after an unrelenting campaign of propaganda in the face of public apathy and complacency - much as the Nazis did in the elections of 1933 in Germany that brought Adolf Hitler to power - in an election which the Democrats managed to win marginally, in some cases winning in local elections by merely a few hundreds or a few thousands of votes in constituencies of millions of people, abrogating the reigns of power from the silent majority... nothing but a political "Coup D' Etat"!

That we would have allowed this travesty to happen because we were all too busy watching "American Idol" or "Survivor" instead of getting out the vote, is what is really surreal!!!

Now the "Al-Democommies" are in power and creating havoc for the rest of us!

Althor

[templar knight]

dylan, are you Legalize's little bitch, or can't she...uh, he, answer for himself?

[bloodrage bob]

well, *close*, dylan, but......no cigar. (st.) phoenix will get no answer because the alleged, self-described "lawyer" legalize - amazingly always here and posting , as opposed to doing that legal stuff he/she SAYS he/she does for a living - legalize is just another liberal pussy.

and as such, will run away like a scalded dog from specific questions and answers. see also: "zifnab", and "response to 9-11".

a little help here: which is more proper? A)"liberals are cowardly hypocrites"? or...
B)"liberals are hypocritical cowards"?

[Legalize]

Dorian Gray, answer me one question: are you still out of the closet yet or, as your handle suggests, are you still repressing your urges in fine GOP style?

k. knight, that's pretty coming from someone who perpetually interjects himself on behalf of others - holy smokes, just like right now. No, dylan, whom I've never encountered, is exactly right. He or she simply stated the truth much more succinctly than I would have had the patience for.

[tk]

bloodrage bob--the answer rest with the underlining question; are they fundamentally cowards or hypocrites? I reject coward. Many are sincere in their beliefs but are hypocrites because of the difference between their words and their actions. Some could be cowards but not most just like the rest of us. Therefore I vote for some are cowardly hypocrites.

[Phoenix]

Legalize,

What about your elements of intent and commanded action here at Riehl World View? Seems to me intimidation, verbal mockery, hate-speech, threats of violence against another, verbal assault are all solicitations of violence. You are guilty of all these crimes against humanity.

How do you answer for that? You offend me, intimidate me, make me feel frightened by your words of hate, and because I am a woman, I feel sexually violated by your crass, threatening, and vulgar speech. This is a public forum and you have made actionable statements that threaten all of us who visit here.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix | Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 11:38 AM

Legalize,

I asked you a direct question. Answer it, please.

Phoenix

Posted by: Phoenix | Tuesday, April 24, 2007 at 12:46 PM

~~~~

Legalize,

I asked you a direct question. Answer it, please.

Phoenix

[bloodrage bob]

(theme music from 'final jeopardy' plays as we all wait patiently for the alleged "lawyer" to muster up the balls to answer a direct question....)

and wait....and wait.....

[seekeronos]

Legal-poos won't answer that. Like many other neo-Marxist "intellectuals", he runs away like a cockroach in a bright room when confronted with a direct question that if anwsered honestly, it would show him as nothing more than a thug in a fancy suit...

A 125-lb. thug with big goofy-looking glasses who probably lusted after the jocks that "wedgied" his scrawny butt in the high school locker room, but the brain of a thug nonetheless.

[Leatherneck]

The Imam. I believe he is just another moon god worshipping POS allowed into this country by the State Department. Hey State Department, fire yourselves. Do the country a favor.