Some local Muslims are urging people to boycott advertisers of WBT's "Jeff Katz Show," saying the conservative radio talker insults their religion with "hate-filled" comments on the air.
At a Wednesday news conference, Jibril Hough of the Charlotte-based Islamic Political Party of America charged that Katz speaks mockingly about Muslims and showcases only critics of Islam on his 3-6 p.m. show at 1110 AM.


What kind of world do we live in where we can\'t express our foaming hatred of ragheads?
They\'d better be lucky we don\'t put tattoos on em and throw them into concentration camps Malkin style. Or Nuke them and convert their leaders to Christianity Coulter style.
Besides it ain\'t polite to hate blacks, jews, and Mexicans are too big a voting bloc now. Us real Americans (the fat white middle american middle class Christian victim) have to hate and fear someone.
Stupid Sand N%$$%%S.
Posted by: mightyjoeyoung | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 05:00 PM
"...saying the conservative radio talker insults their religion with "hate-filled" comments on the air."
See, that's how you know they're new to the country. Every other minority got over this about ten years ago.
Posted by: Zifnab | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 05:06 PM
Wow thank God I don't around you rednecks. Did you forget your ancestors came here off a boat what.. not even 100, 200 years ago? You act like you were natives here... oh yeah that's right there aren't any of those left.. you killed all of them off.
Posted by: A muslim | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 05:17 PM
You have to be the biggest idiot I have ever heard of.
Are you going to rebut something or just keep making dumb comments?
Posted by: Jeff | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 05:17 PM
A Muslim, you're a biatch. If you were European and around back in those days, you would have done the same thing. Don't come with the crap. And why do you assume that RWV commenters are a bunch rednecks?
Posted by: Wil | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 06:28 PM
A_muslim = Bob = Andrew = Artie = Carl = Rob = SockpuppetMaster = ???
Same righting style even. Now go play in traffic, boy. Ya bother us.
Posted by: seekeronos | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 06:40 PM
*writing style. Yeek I need a nap. :P
Posted by: seekeronos | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 06:41 PM
Wow, how long does it take a thread a RWV to go off topic? This is getting ridiculas, we can have a conversation without the libs siderailing the discussion with idiot off topic comments.
Anyways. This is typical CAIR stuff, their goal is to entirely stifle debate, and make sure that Muslims can choose the language of debate if it does occur. Dhimmi, is off-topic, as is affiliating Muslims to terrorism, but it is fine to affiliate Christians to the Crusades (which were mostly done a millenia ago (I know it continued after that a little)). CAIR, and people dreaming of America becoming a Muslim state under Shari'a law are well under way, they have made many things taboo, and we are afraid of saying somethings, because we don't want to get our heads chopped off (which I am not technically allowed to say in a debate with a Muslim). Muslims want to remind us that it is a tiny minority (about 3%) that are willing killing for the Religion of Piece (sp intentional).
I can tell you that I love New Hampshire's motto: "Live free or die." And I would die to stop Shari'a law, or the cause of Islam overwriting my freedoms. However I fear that less and less people share this sentiment, and with school teaching unquestioning tolerance, I fear furthur that our next generation will not stop their rights from being tampled for the cause of "to not offend."
I guess I should ask: If Muslims were rioting in the street en masse (50% or more) what actions should the government take?
I would really be interested in both sides.
Posted by: Jeff | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 06:48 PM
Hmm, radio in NC that is racist and xenophobic? Shocking, next you're going to tell me that most of the listeners live in trailers and have impregnated blood relatives.
Posted by: BobInStamford | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 07:44 PM
Thank you for making yourself look to be a bigger fool than normal seek, by the way do you have any proof I am any of those other posters as you claim? Or should we just believe you based on your sterling reputation?
Posted by: Rob Kaufman | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 08:54 PM
Or should we just believe you based on your sterling reputation?
Yes. His rep is way beter than you/Bob/... etc.
Posted by: Jeff | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 09:03 PM
Thank you Jeff, have you learned how to spell hypocrisy yet?
Posted by: Rob Kaufman | Thursday, March 08, 2007 at 09:44 PM
"Same righting style even"
Righting style??? C'mon that's really sad.
Posted by: TheSpartan | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 12:45 AM
He corrected right after...
Posted by: Jeff | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 08:51 AM
Where is there any evidence that the muslims who have come to this country want Sharia law, outside of the paranoid minds of the righties?
I've said before and I will say again, that if you want the sharia law then you have come to the wrong country and should go back to the ME.
But I don't think there IS any evidence of muslims in the US wanting this, this is more fantasy, just like the idea that there are thousands of Al Quada cells in the US that Hezbollah now has terror cells in the US and all the rest of the anti muslim rhetoric.
Please, nutters, never try and say that you wouldn't support 100% the idea of rounding up all Muslims and Muslim Americans and Arab Americans and either deporting them or putting them in camps, I know you would.
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 09:04 AM
"But I don't think there IS any evidence of muslims in the US wanting this, this is more fantasy, just like the idea that there are thousands of Al Quada cells in the US that Hezbollah now has terror cells in the US and all the rest of the anti muslim rhetoric."
But... but... but... bin Laden. Saddam Hussien Obama. 9/11! 9/11! 9/11!
Ann Coulter says we have to round up all the ragheads and Michelle Malkin says internment camps are the only things that will keep airliners from crashing into you while you're checking the mail. Evidence, smevidence. We have to act now before Al Qaeda in America gets a nuclear weapon from yellow cake in Niger provided by liberal operatives in the CIA and blows up a major US city.
Please, like any of this was ever ment to make sense. It's just a scare tactic to get Republicans in office so they can cut taxes and gut government. Muslims, ultimately, have absolutely nothing to do with it. It's all about the money.
Posted by: Zifnab | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 10:39 AM
I think you are wrong about that. The American public has now been conditioned to think that Arab/Muslim=Terrorist. They've been told over and over that there are terrorist cells all over the country and that the Muslims want to attack us 'over here' any chance they get. Just look at this blog and what these nuts write about the arabs.
As far as the powers that be knowing it's all a scam, maybe yes maybe no. I suspect that when Nazi Germany first started scapegoating the jews, most in the upper echelons saw it for what it was, scapegoating, fear mongering and later a way to get a lot of land and money for no cost. But, eventually the public lie of the jews destroying the country became a private truth and the Nazi elites themselves began to believe their own lies.
This is what I see happening in this country with the muslims.
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 11:41 AM
I think we ought to keep a VERY watchful eye on the Muslims. Their own "holy Koran" stipulates that they are to wage warfare (terrorist or outright war) on non-muslims (kuffar/infidels) until they are made to feel subdued, and pay the Jizyah tax. Or killed.
In case you missed it, their own SCRIPTURES command them to overthrow any non-muslim governments.
In my opinion, Islam no longer has a definition as a religion, but as an enemy ideology... until the Muslims prove otherwise by castigating and excommunicating their jihadist brethren.
Until then, my judgment is that Islam no longer deserves the constitutional protection given to other faiths per freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, and freedom of the press, and should be suppressed with rigor.
We _seriously_ need to revive COINTELPRO or something similar to it to infiltrate and shut down groups like CAIR, the ACLU, and other front groups for Islamists.
And if (as Jeff asked) a city with a significant Muslim population began rioting and looting, then the government has a constitutional right to put that rebellion down with lethal force - perhaps even to the point of calling on the militias (both organized and unorganized).
Since there is a significant enemy alien population of Muslims (note that I do not limit this to Arabs or Persians specifically) ... it could also fall under the constitutional definitions of using the militia to repel a foreign invasion.
An internment policy may indeed be more than appropriate.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 12:15 PM
You are paranoid and insane.
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 12:44 PM
Paranoid? I'd say I have a "healthy level of caution".
Insane? Well, you aren't the first leftie to accuse me of that. :P
But I've read my copy of the Koran, and it plainly is all about killing the Christians and the Jews, and subduing the earth under the feet of Allah.
Not on my watch, though.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 01:02 PM
Oh, and for the evidence (Besides the Koran and the Hadiths) check out Youtube. Those folks seem to be in bed with the radical muzzies.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 02:33 PM
The ACLU is a "front" for radical Islam.
The ACLU should be shut down.
Islam should be suppressed with vigor.
Internment of muslims 'may' be appropriate.
*It also appears you believe muslims should be denied freedom of speech and freedom of assembly*
Sorry, dude, I have to go with paranoid and insane.
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 03:55 PM
We did the same with Japanese (and to a far lesser extent, Germans) where such restrictions were applicable in WW2.
I wonder how many 5th column Japanese and German terrorists blew things up during that war?
*sound of crickets*
Yeah, that's what I thought. Zilch.
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, March 09, 2007 at 10:05 PM