« Tony Snow's Cancer Returns | Main | Dutch Treat Tax Relief: Loop Hole, Or Just Loopy? »

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c1db69e200d83526622569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How To Lose The War On Terror:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

So you dont win the war on terror by trading hostages, because the terrorists will celebrate the trade as a victory every time.

Additionally, you dont win the war on terror by blowing up terrorists, because for every terrorist you blow up, 2 more spawn. Remember good old Cheney talking about the "last throes"...?

So how do you win the war on terror? You cant bargain with them, and you cant blow them all away without committing 100% total and complete genocide on the entire continent. Is there something Im missing here?

There's a diplomatic solution, but apparently that's for pussies. Then there's "winning hearts and minds", which is apparently accomplished by no-bidding schools out to shitty contractors and instigating civil war with ham-handed, partisan party loyalists delegated as foreign aids.

Remember Kosavo? If only we had real leadership now like hwe had then. *sigh*

Diplomatic solution - yeah sure, talk while they plot. Are you just cowards, or what?

"for every terrorist you blow up, 2 more spawn."

Even if true, which it isn't, that just makes for what I would call a target rich environment.

The diplomatic solution is the one in which you convince your enemy he doesn't want to kill you. It's the solution we've been running with for the past 50 years, and its done amazingly well.

I can't believe you made that last statement, Zif. You are certifiable.


As far as this story goes, I bet there is plenty not being reported in the papers. The Italians have a large indigenous population of Muslims. It may well be they were afraid of internal uprisings and figured five Taliban prisoners in an exchange for one of their own was worth it to keep their already restive country quiet. They have 2,000 fighters out there, so we can't call chicken yet. Maybe they figure those troops will shoot the Taliban prisoners sooner or later. In fact, make it a point.

It's a face-game for all the allied leaders. God, who would want their jobs these days.

Amid this bad news and more jabbering from the know nothing left it is fitting to note that the Surge is having a very obvious roborant effect on the great humanitarian mission of our time-the liberation of Iraq.

BTW Aaron, what you don't get is that for every terrorist you kill you don't spawn two more, you in fact discourage others. The tough lesson (for you) is that potential terrorists are more connected to reality than leftists.

"Real" leadership? "The diplomatic solution is the one in which you convince your enemy he doesn't want to kill you."

Thanks for showing how demented you are Zif. Clinton bombed the crap out the Serbs. Forget about that? He ALSO hired Halliburton-but that's ok because a Dem did it. Right? Yeah, you can talk to people whose goal is to kill the infidels/convert the world to Islam. Zif, if your head was shoved any further up your ass you'd disappear.

Oh noes, they're celebrating! We're dooooooooomed! We have to close the celebration gap!

Here's how you really lose the War on Terror. Make a public spectacle of ripping your clothes and wetting the bed every time your opponent trash talks you.

Mullah Cimoc say this big victory for the students. now amriki alliance just fall apart.

so hope ameriki detective finding who start this killing: neocons spy work for the israeli.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Donations Appreciated

Blog Ads


Syndigo

AdSense

Infolinks

Search

Wikio Top Fifty

Memeorandum

Blog Roll

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

Find the best blogs at Blogs.com.

2006 Weblog Awards


Technorati


Blog powered by TypePad