Literally: There's that anguished moment of waiting when you think you've finally gotten rid of your hiccups and the clock ticks as you sit there waiting for that first post breath-holding yelp that says you're wrong. Hard to imagine the disappointment if you had the kind of hiccups that go on and on. Strange.
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. (AP) -- A 15-year-old girl who hiccuped her way through part of January and all of February is hiccuping once again.
Jennifer Mee, who hiccuped close to 50 times each waking minute for more than five weeks starting Jan. 23, began hiccuping again Thursday morning after a nose bleed, said her mother, Rachel Robidoux.
It occured during Mee's second day back at school since her first bout of hiccups stopped Feb. 28, said Robidoux.
"I'm at my wit's end," Robidoux said.
Mee was taken to the emergency room earlier this month when her hiccups returned. They stopped, though, and Mee felt it was safe to go back to school.


Meanwhile, Valarie Plame gives testimony on the Senate Floor concerning her outing and the outing of dozens - perhaps hundreds - of other CIA agents in or associated with the Brewster Jennings Corporation.
But yes. Hiccup girl. Please continue.
Posted by: Zifnab | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 11:41 AM
Al Gore is a hypocrite.
The Dems want to lose in Iraq.
Macaca!
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 11:51 AM
Plame didn't seem do worried about her identity when she did that photo spread for Vanity Fair, but you know....not calling her a hypocrite or anything. Oh, and i guess it doesnt matter that the woman who WROTE THE LAW for the covert protection act even admitted that the covert status didn't apply to VAlerie Plame and those like her, but whatever.
Oh, and we already know WHY she is testifying....to smear the Bush Administration. Thats no secret. wasn't a scandal in the first place and now it's just someone beating a dead horse....again.
Posted by: Seferas-H. | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 11:57 AM
Are you saying it isn't wrong to publicly disclose the identity of a covert CIA operative?
Or are you saying since the illegality of disclosing the identity of this covert CIA operative is in dispute that you don't care?
Or do you just not care because disclosing the identity of this covert CIA operative was done as part of a Republican smear campaign?
Given the patriotic chest thumping that comes from the cons I would think you would outraged that anyone would dare 'out' a covert CIA operative whose life's work was about protecting and defending America?
I guess you are only patriotic when it serves your political purposes, no surprise there.
If John Kerry or any other Democrat had outed Valerie Plame we would never heard the end of it, you nutters would be demanding someone be sent to prison for treason.
Posted by: yyy | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:04 PM
Guys, guys. The topic was hiccups. Come on now.
Posted by: Zifnab | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:15 PM
*hic*
Posted by: seekeronos | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:30 PM
I believe this outing law requires the CIA employee to be covert AND overseas within the last three years to be considered a covert operative. That is why Fitzgerald did not go after Armitage and why he did not accuse Libby under the law in question. Where have you guys been and what have you been reading that gives you such a distorted view? Or perhaps I'm wrong. If so could you explain Fitz's legal actions?
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:30 PM
Geesh, Armitage outted her, He's Colin Powell's boy, ask him. And then tell me why a CIA officer sends her idiot husband to do a bit of work? Were they Republicans, the cries would be nepotism, fraud, whatever. Life's too short to follow that BS.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:34 PM
Say, Zif and y, don't forget to go back to comments on Dan's piece about our goodwill ambassador w/o portfolio, H. Dean. There's more there for your edification.
Posted by: Fred Beloit | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 12:37 PM
Strangely enough, Dan, none of that saved Libby.
But if you want to indite the entire Washington judical system, feel free. Nothing wrong with lying to a grand jury under oath, right? Pardon! Pardon!
Armitage leaked it, and Rove et al piled on. Surprise, surprise, it was Novak and Miller, two of the biggest war cheerleaders who decided to print Plame's identity. Then they came back and tried to cover their roles in spreading Plame's identity after the cat was out of the bag.
This entire thing recked of "inside job" and still does. And its all to keep the fire under the "Iraq has WMDs!" meme that for some reason beyond comprehension just won't die.
Dan, seeker, HR, Fred, everybody... this may come as a shock, but Iraq didn't have any nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons. They didn't exist. We invaded the country for absolutely no reason. That was dumb.
Posted by: Zifnab | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 01:16 PM
Novak
Idiot, Novak was not for the ar.
Posted by: Dan Riehl | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 01:30 PM
"Where have you guys been and what have you been reading that gives you such a distorted view?"
Wherever it is, I'm pretty sure you need a Delorean powered by flux capacitors to get there ;->
Posted by: Purple Avenger | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 01:34 PM
Dammit, let's go back to hiccup girl!
Err...got nothin'.
Posted by: madne0 | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 04:08 PM
I volunteer to scare her real bad. (one topic + one off topic = awesome)
Posted by: Buzzy | Friday, March 16, 2007 at 04:42 PM